
#1
Feb1114, 10:44 AM

P: 196

Ok. So the answer to finding the solution of
[itex](1)^x=1[/itex] is clear. But say we didnt know it and wanted to solve it. One approach is to take the log of both sides [itex]x\cdot log(1)=log(1)=0[/itex] But now the right hand side is defined where as the left is not! What am I missing? 



#2
Feb1114, 11:31 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 3,173

For example, you can't solve the equation [itex] \frac{x}{(x1)} = \frac{1}{(x1)} [/itex] by multiplying both sides by [itex] x1 [/itex]. Mathematical manipulations are intended as a way to abbreviate thinking, not as a way of eliminating it. When we have an equation of the form [itex] f(x) = g(x) [/itex] and do some manipulation on it to produce another equation [itex] h(x) = r(x) [/itex] then we are suppose to ask if the manipulation may have created an equation that has more or fewer solutions than the original equation. 



#3
Feb1114, 11:38 AM

P: 498

You need a logarithm that's defined for complex numbers.




#4
Feb1114, 12:16 PM

P: 196

solve (1)^x=1 



#5
Feb1114, 12:20 PM

P: 196

[itex]i\pi\ne 0[/itex] 



#6
Feb1114, 12:40 PM

P: 498

Maybe let me ask this way: what are the complex logs of 1?




#7
Feb1114, 12:58 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 3,173

You aren't using the proper terminology for talking about equations. An equation in a variable x is a statement that two functions of x are equal. A solution to the equation is a value of x that makes the statement true. The set of all solutions to the equation is called "the solution set". The left hand side of an equation may not equal the right hand side of the equation for some , or for any values of the variable x. I think what you are trying to say is that taking the log of both sides of the equation [itex] (1)^x = 1 [/itex] transforms it to another equation, which has a different solution set (namely the null set since the transformed equation has no solutions). There is no mathematical principle that says applying the natural logarithm function to both sides of an equation will transform it to a new equation that has the same solution set as the original equation. If you define a complex logarithm such that [itex] log(1) = i \pi [/itex] and transform the new equation to [itex] x (i \pi) = 0 [/itex] then [itex] x = 0 [/itex] is a solution to the transformed equation. 



#9
Feb1114, 07:59 PM

P: 1,351





#10
Feb1114, 11:02 PM

P: 427





#11
Feb1214, 03:03 AM

P: 422

[tex]\\(1)^x=1 \\ \\x=\log_{1}(1) \\ \\x=\frac{\ln(1)}{\ln(1)} \\ \\x=\frac{0}{i \pi} \\ \\x=0[/tex]




#12
Feb1214, 08:00 AM

P: 5

you cannot add log because log(1) is not defined.




#13
Feb1214, 08:05 AM

P: 5

(1)^2y = (1)^ ( even integer) = 1
(2)^(2y+1) = (1)^(odd integer) = 1 since 2y and (2y+1) form all N ( natural number) then you can say the only solution will be if x is even, i.e x= 2y , and y belongs to N 



#14
Feb1514, 02:11 PM

HW Helper
P: 2,151

$$e^{x \, \log(1)}=e^0 \\ e^{x \, \pi \imath}=e^0$$ In general we cannot conclude x=y from f(x)=f(y) In this case exp is a periodic function with period 2π i so from $$e^{x \, \pi \imath}=e^0 \\ \text{we conclude}\\ x \, \pi \imath=2n \, \pi \imath \\ \text{for some $n \in \mathbb{Z}$} $$ 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Solve sin 20° sin 40° sin 60° sin 80°sin 20° cos 30° sin 40°  General Math  2  
Solve 3x7x8 > 4 (solve algebraically)  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  6  
I forgot how I can solve this... Like this example:Solve for the  Calculus  2  
how do you solve problem you cannot solve?  Academic Guidance  16  
How to solve for v?!  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  9 