American or British style Democracy?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion contrasts American and British styles of democracy, focusing on their structural differences, electoral processes, and the relationship between legislative and executive branches. Participants explore the implications of these differences without reaching a consensus on which system is superior.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the American system, highlighting the separation of powers between the elected President and Congress, suggesting this creates checks and balances.
  • Another participant describes the British system, noting that the majority party in Parliament forms the government, which may lead to a more unified legislative and executive branch.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the superiority of either system, referencing the comedic portrayal of British politics in the television series "Yes, Minister" as a point of interest.
  • A later reply echoes the sentiment about the humor in British governance, contrasting it with a perceived lack of humor in the American political system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach an agreement on which system is superior, and multiple competing views remain regarding the effectiveness and characteristics of each democracy.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the details of the electoral processes and governance structures, indicating a reliance on personal observations rather than formal knowledge.

wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
Which form of Democracy do you think is better, the American style or the British style?

The differences I'm looking to contrast in this thread are specifically that in America, you have a President who is elected by the people of the whole country and is the chief executive officer, and you have a separate Congress which is elected by States or smaller Congressional districts. In England, if I'm not mistaken, all they have as far as National elections are local Parlaimentary elections. Whichever party wins a majority gets to "form a government", as in choosing a chief executive officer, and since they have a majority, they have most control over the governments actions in general.

In America, it is set up so the Legislative and Executive branches check each other, and the Legislature can easily be controlled by a different party than the Executive branch. In England, it is seemingly set up so the Legislative and Executive branches work together, since the majority legislative party essentially forms the government to their likings.

So what do you think is the superior system of governance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didnt vote, and no absolutely sod all about how the governement works. But i think that you vote for a party to run the national governement (labour) and then you can vote for the same party or a different party (lib dems) locally. I'm not sure though never really bothered to pay any attention to the election campaign.
 
I don't know which system is superior, but judging from my many viewings of the "Yes, Minister" television series, the British system is certainly the funniest.
 
jma2001 said:
I don't know which system is superior, but judging from my many viewings of the "Yes, Minister" television series, the British system is certainly the funniest.

Yes, in spite of many well-remembered sidesplitters, us USans don't have much of a sense of humor about our government.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
14K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K