Relating Coefficient of Friction for my Tyre Experiment

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of friction for a tyre sample in an experiment involving a concrete surface angled at 30 degrees. The setup includes a pulley system and varying weights to determine the point at which the tyre slips.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to relate the weight at which the tyre slips to the coefficient of friction, questioning the influence of the angle of the surface and the load applied to the tyre.

Discussion Status

Participants have offered guidance on considering the forces acting on the tyre and the normal force involved. There is an exploration of the relationship between static friction and the forces at play, with suggestions to use free body diagrams and symbolic reasoning.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes the specific setup of the experiment, including the angle of the concrete surface and the weights used, while also expressing uncertainty about how these factors influence the calculation of the coefficient of friction.

Matt.D
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi all!

How do you calculate the coefficient of friction for a tyre sample going against concrete?

My experiment involves a uniform piece of concrete angled at 30 degrees with a pulley attached at the raised end.
The tyre sample is placed at the end of the concrete slab and is loaded with 1.0kg of weight to keep it in constant contact with the surface.
The tyre sample is connected to a piece of string that runs over the pulley and at is connected at the other end to a 'weight holder', which I continue to add weights to until the rubber sample moves or loses grip.

I've found that the rubber will take 1.3kg of weight before it slips, but how do I translate that to a coefficient of friction?

I've been looking at a number of formulas, but I can't find any that take into account the angle of the surface - 30 degrees, which I'm sure has a direct effect on the experiment.
Also, do I need to take into account the 'load' I've placed on top of the rubber to keep it pressed down, or will this cancel itself out?

I've uploaded a diagram I drew of how the experiment is setup. Please note the downward arrow above the tyre sample is to exagerate the load pressing down onto the surface. The other arrows pointing to the right and downward, next to the pulley, show the direction of force.

Grey = the floor the experiment is taking place
Orange = the concrete (its a garden edging strip, hence the color ; )
Brown = Wood. I've used a wooden block to hold the concrete block in place and a small piece of wood to make a 'mounting block' for the rubber and weight to go on.

Thanks for looking!

Matt
 

Attachments

  • myexperiment.JPG
    myexperiment.JPG
    12.8 KB · Views: 507
Physics news on Phys.org
What your experiment allows you to find is the maximum static friction that the surfaces can support, which relates to the coefficient of static friction by [itex]\mu N = m_2 g[/itex], where N is the normal force pressing the surfaces together and [itex]m_2[/itex] is the mass of the hanging weight. To find the normal force, consider the forces acting on your 1.0 kg mass. (What's the component of its weight normal to the surface?)
 
It might help you if you drew a freebody diagram for yourself. First label an axis whose origin is at the center of mass and draw the forces acting on the object. You should notice the relation if you know Newtons laws and trig.
 
If you do the math correctly you get one of the most "elegant" formulas in physics as a result (lots of things cancel leaving a very simple relationship).
 
Chi Meson makes an important point. Never rush to just "plug in numbers"; always try to work out the physics symbolically as much as possible. Two big benefits of doing this: (1) Things often simplify greatly, thus reducing your source for arithmetic mistakes when you do finally plug in the numbers, and (2) you stand a much better chance of understanding the physics involved instead of getting lost in arithmetic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K