Register to reply

Were we really created from supernovas?

by Chris42393
Tags: supernovas
Share this thread:
Chris42393
#1
Mar30-14, 10:46 AM
P: 1
Hello, I'm just doing some research on how life on Earth started (for my own reasons) and I seen that a theory was we came to be from the aftermath of supernovas.

Is this the case? Has this been proved for sure?
Phys.Org News Partner Astronomy news on Phys.org
Exoplanet measured with remarkable precision
New star catalog reveals unexpected 'solar salad'
RXTE satellite decodes the rhythm of an unusual black hole
Earl of Plasma
#2
Mar30-14, 11:40 AM
P: 15
Hello, I'm just doing some research on how life on Earth started (for my own reasons) and I seen that a theory was we came to be from the aftermath of supernovas.

Is this the case? Has this been proved for sure?
In the beginning the only matter was hydrogen. By fusion process in the star hydrogen forms to heavier element. Smaller stars stop forming element relative early. The last matter they build is lighter then iron. Then the gases expand and they then shrink to a dense dwarf. That's a well known fact and many smaller stars in different stages has been observed. I'm not sure if they get scattered and become part of other planets and stars.

Big stars however eventually forms iron and after that nothing can keep the enormous mass in the same volume as before. That's because the fusion process after iron lose binding energy, so the energy to expand the mass get less and less but the mass and gravity is still the same. After forming iron they implode with an unbelievable pressure which actually can form these heavier elements. These leads soon to an supernova explosion. The matter from these definitely get scattered far away. Ending up in nebulous, stars and planets.

If its proven? Yes big stars has been observed in many stages including supernovas. The light spectra from stars tells what elements they consist of as any spectra.
Chronos
#3
Mar30-14, 05:49 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Chronos's Avatar
P: 9,428
r-process nucleosynthesis in ejecta from neutron stars is an emerging candidate to explain heavy element production, e.g., http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.2939, The long-term evolution of neutron star merger remnants - I. The impact of r-process nucleosynthesis. The big bang produced only light elements, primarily hydrogen and helium with a sprinkling of elements through boron. Heavier elements are produced by stellar processes.

AlephZero
#4
Mar30-14, 06:29 PM
Engineering
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 7,103
Were we really created from supernovas?

Quote Quote by Earl of Plasma View Post
In the beginning the only matter was hydrogen.
IMO that assertion needs justification.

I don't have any problem with the experimental evidence that new stars consist mostly of hydrogen, and synthesize heavier elements through fusion.

But given that most of the "known" universe appears to consist of dark matter and dark energy, neither of which are understood, it seems a bit presumptuous to assume that if our current models of the early universe predict that the all of the earliest matter was light elements, that prediction is beyond question.

(But I'm no expert here - I haven't read much about cosmology since the books by George Gamow et al!)
Drakkith
#5
Mar30-14, 08:06 PM
Mentor
Drakkith's Avatar
P: 11,823
Aleph, I don't think dark matter and dark energy are included in the term "matter". So while both dark matter and dark energy almost certainly existed, they aren't included in the discussion here because they aren't normal matter.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Sciam Article on Supernovas Astronomy & Astrophysics 5
Are blackholes formed in other ways besides supernovas? Astronomy & Astrophysics 6
How many times more powerful are gammaray bursts than supernovas General Physics 2
Nucleosynthesis with the Big Bang and the Supernovas? Cosmology 1
Tis the season for ...supernovas? Astronomy & Astrophysics 2