Register to reply

Fossil from the lower Jurasic, Holzmaden, Germany

by DrDu
Tags: fossil, germany, holzmaden, jurasic
Share this thread:
DrDu
#1
Mar31-14, 02:36 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,547
Recently, I collected fossils from the famous posidonia shells from the lower Jurasic (Toarcium or Lias epsilon) in Holzmaden in the south west of Germany near Stuttgart. Besides numerous Ammonites I found some of the following fossils which I don't quite know what it is. Any ideas?
They are quite thick "leaves" which seem to be connected to some thicker more or less spherical stem(now completely pyritized in the upper part of the picture) altough I did not prepare them, so the anatomy is just a guess. The size is about 3 cm.

Thank you!
Attached Thumbnails
Fossil.JPG  
Phys.Org News Partner Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Evo
#2
Mar31-14, 04:05 PM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 26,412
They remind me of ginko, but I'm not sure if they lived where you found this, but they do date back to the lower Jurasic.
davenn
#3
Mar31-14, 08:35 PM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
davenn's Avatar
P: 2,457
looks like the typical brachiopod of that era
I have collected a good few out of the Jurassic strata on the SE coast of the South Island of New Zealand, part of the Southland Syncline

cheers
Dave
Attached Thumbnails
images406Y16YD.jpg  

DrDu
#4
Apr1-14, 01:43 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,547
Fossil from the lower Jurasic, Holzmaden, Germany

Thank you for your replies!
I don't think it is gingko, although gingko leaves have been found at that site, because it is a marine environment and leaves of land plants are rare.
I was considering also brachiopods, but they are a little bit too irregular and this does also not explain the stem.
Now that I was looking for brachiopods, I found some pictures of crinoids from Holzmaden which seem to be quite similar:
http://www.erftalnews.de/Bilder/Samm...Seelilie_2.jpg
davenn
#5
Apr1-14, 02:58 AM
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
davenn's Avatar
P: 2,457
that link wont open, can you post a pic here please

not sure what the "stem" is that you are seeing ?

of course there's no reason why you wouldnt have a crinoid and a brachiopod in close proximity

I would be VERY suprised if that main object in the centre isnt a brachiopod

they come in all sorts of variations and ones from that far back in time are often have quite distorted shapes due to the pressures of burial

cheers
Dave
DrDu
#6
Apr1-14, 03:38 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,547
Quote Quote by davenn View Post
that link wont open, can you post a pic here please
Strange, maybe you can surf to
http://www.erftalnews.de
Then click on "Sammlung"->"Seelilien"
Evo
#7
Apr1-14, 11:40 AM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 26,412
I have tons of crinoid fossils, they're everywhere here, in my yard. Is the picture you posted a disc from the stem? I've never seen a crinoid with "leaves" like that. They're actually not a plant.

https://www.google.com/search?q=crin...w=1010&bih=598

I did find this photo of a brachiopod that does look similar to your picture, not like the distinct brachiopods I find here. Letter T is the brachiopod.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ThecideanZalas.jpg
edwardr
#8
Apr2-14, 09:00 AM
edwardr's Avatar
P: 6
It looks to me like a type of foraminiferan known as a nummulite. I've found plenty of these myself in Miocene limestone. I don't think they've been found in Cretaceous rock though.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nummulite
DrDu
#9
Apr2-14, 12:52 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,547
According to the german wikipedia, nummulites are first found in the upper Cretaceous rocks. But my fossils are definitively from the lower Jurassic.
Evo
#10
Apr2-14, 01:02 PM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 26,412
It really doesn't look exactly like anything I've seen, but it's difficult from only a picture, but you seem to know your fossils and you're stumped. If you have a local university, perhaps someone in the paleontology department could identify it.
DrDu
#11
Apr2-14, 02:11 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,547
According to the german wikipedia, nummulites are first found in the upper Cretaceous rocks. But my fossils are definitively from the lower Jurassic.
DrDu
#12
Apr2-14, 02:14 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,547
The problem is that I haven't got any books on fossils, but it seems I have to change this.
Holzmaden is one of the most famous sites in Germany for fossils and I am quite sure that this relic, which seems to be relatively abundant, is described somewhere.
edwardr
#13
Apr2-14, 02:21 PM
edwardr's Avatar
P: 6
You might want to run it by this community:

http://www.thefossilforum.com/index..../14-fossil-id/
DrDu
#14
Apr2-14, 03:00 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,547
I think I got it: It isn't a fossil at all but a pyrite sun, i.e. a pyrite formation of inorganic origin.
See e.g.
http://www.holzmadenfossilien.de/inh...nne%20003.html
Evo
#15
Apr2-14, 03:18 PM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 26,412
Quote Quote by DrDu View Post
I think I got it: It isn't a fossil at all but a pyrite sun, i.e. a pyrite formation of inorganic origin.
See e.g.
http://www.holzmadenfossilien.de/inh...nne%20003.html
Wow, it does look like a fossilized plant.
DrDu
#16
Apr2-14, 03:18 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,547
As a reward for your help I upload here a picture of a real fossil found there. I exaggerated the contrast somewhat, but this more how it looked when it was fresh and wet.
Attached Thumbnails
Ammonit2.jpg  
Evo
#17
Apr2-14, 03:46 PM
Mentor
Evo's Avatar
P: 26,412
Quote Quote by DrDu View Post
As a reward for your help I upload here a picture of a real fossil found there. I exaggerated the contrast somewhat, but this more how it looked when it was fresh and wet.
Very nice!


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is there any new evidence on the environment during the Jurasic period? Earth 3
I have found a fossil. What plants fossil is this? how can i determine the age? General Discussion 27
Is this a fossil? General Discussion 6
Fossil of what? Earth 16
Fossil ID? Earth 4