Energy of Activation Clarification

In summary: The energy of activation is the minimum amount of energy required to bring about formation of the transition state. This can be confirmed by the use of potential-energy surfaces like this. This plots potential versus different states of this system. In traveling along the minimum path from reactants to products, the highest point (the saddle point) represents the highest potential energy of the system. This height of this relative to the reactants represents the activation energy. Since the work done by a conservative force is equal to the negative change in the potential energy, the activation energy does indeed represent the minimum energy requirement--all of this is consistent.In summary, transition state theory deals with kinetics, Gibbs and Helmholtz energies deal with thermodynamics.
  • #1
david_w
3
0
In transition state theory, the energy of activation (E) shows up in the Arrenhius equation as: k=Ae^(-E/RT). Does this energy of activation term correspond to internal energy? Or is it some other type of energy (i.e. Gibbs, Helmholtz)? I know its not Gibbs because that appears in the Eyring equation, but I just wanted to clarify that it's internal energy.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #2
Transition state theory deals with kinetics, Gibbs and Helmholtz energies deal with thermodynamics. Mixing these things never helps.
 
  • #3
Yes, but the thermodynamics of the transition state affects the kinetics.
 
  • #4
David_w is right in that in transition state theory, the rate depends on the Gibbs free energy of the activated complex

Arrhenius equation is purely empirical. You can use ##E=-d ln k/d((RT)^{-1})## to define E, using the expression for k from transition state theory. In this derivation, you have to take in mind that ##\Delta G## also depends on T.
Compare this article from the German wikipedia:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyring-Theorie
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Here's my understanding.

The activation energy is defined as the minimum amount of energy required to bring about formation of the transition state. This can be confirmed by the use of potential-energy surfaces like this. This plots potential versus different states of this system. In traveling along the minimum path from reactants to products, the highest point (the saddle point) represents the highest potential energy of the system. This height of this relative to the reactants represents the activation energy. Since the work done by a conservative force is equal to the negative change in the potential energy, the activation energy does indeed represent the minimum energy requirement--all of this is consistent.

Let's turn now to Transition-State Theory and the Eyring equation. Using the Eyring equation in the form: [itex]k=\frac{k_B T}{h} K^\ddagger[/itex] along with the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation (as you have mentioned): [itex]\frac{d ln{K^\ddagger}}{dT}=\frac{∆^\ddagger U°}{R T^2}[/itex], you get the following relation: [itex]E_a=RT + ∆^\ddagger U°[/itex].

The last equation says that energy of activation is not internal energy then? I'm not sure what it is then. From an explanation of the Arrhenius equation I've found, it certainly looks like internal energy. This explanation is as follows: [itex]\frac{d ln{K_c°}}{dT}=\frac{∆U°}{R T^2}[/itex]. The equilibrium constant is the ratio of the rate constants: [itex]K_c=\frac{k_1}{k_{-1}}[/itex] and the internal energy change is equal to the difference between the activation energy for the forward reaction and the reverse reaction: [itex]∆U°=E_1-E_{-1}[/itex]. Plugging all of this into the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation and solving yields: [itex]k_1=A_1 e^{-E_1/RT}[/itex] where A is the pre exponential factor and is determined empirically.

Here is where I am really confused. In the second paragraph, we relate activation energy and the change in internal energy. In the third paragraph, it looks like activation energy IS internal energy. This all seems very inconsistent to me. This is all coming from the same source btw (Physical Chemistry by Laidler, Meiser, and Sanctuary).
 

1. What is the energy of activation?

The energy of activation is the minimum amount of energy required for a chemical reaction to occur. It is the energy needed to break the bonds of the reactant molecules in order for the reaction to take place.

2. Why is the energy of activation important?

The energy of activation is important because it determines the rate at which a chemical reaction will occur. A higher energy of activation means the reaction will proceed at a slower rate, while a lower energy of activation means the reaction will proceed at a faster rate.

3. How is the energy of activation calculated?

The energy of activation can be calculated using the Arrhenius equation, which takes into account the temperature, rate constant, and frequency factor of the reaction. It can also be determined experimentally by measuring the reaction rate at different temperatures.

4. What factors can affect the energy of activation?

The energy of activation can be affected by factors such as temperature, concentration of reactants, presence of catalysts, and the nature of the reactants and products. Temperature and concentration both increase the energy of activation, while catalysts decrease it.

5. How does the energy of activation relate to a reaction's equilibrium?

The energy of activation is not directly related to a reaction's equilibrium. Equilibrium refers to the balance between reactants and products, while the energy of activation refers to the energy required for the reaction to occur. However, a lower energy of activation can lead to a faster rate of reaction, which may ultimately affect the equilibrium of the reaction.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
912
Replies
1
Views
748
  • Chemistry
Replies
2
Views
782
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
621
  • Chemistry
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Back
Top