Register to reply 
Considering a circle to be an infinite sided ngon 
Share this thread: 
#1
May914, 08:55 PM

P: 55

as a regular polygon increases in sides, it becomes rounder. As you increase the number of sides, the polygon will tend towards a perfect circle but never quite make it. you can only make the circle with an infinite number of sides  stopping at any other number but infinity you will only get a very very very round but noncircle shape. but you know all this...
IS IT APPROPRIATE TO CONSIDER A CIRCLE A REGULAR POLYGON WITH INFINITE SIDES? ARE THERE ANY DISCREPANCIES IN CONSIDERING A CIRCLE A REGULAR POLYGON? also I am wondering... technically a circle must have vertices of 180 degrees, right? is this a discrepancy? 


#2
May1014, 07:00 AM

Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,691

A polygon, by definition, must have "n" sides and "n" angles for some integer n. "Infinity" is not an integer so you will have you will have to specify what you MEAN by "A REGULAR POLYGON WITH INFINITE SIDES". Once you have done that, perhaps someone can answer.



#3
May1014, 10:12 AM

Mentor
P: 18,345

It is certainly true that a circle is (in some sense) a limiting value of polygons and this fact is extremely useful. But that doesn't mean that the circle is a polygon. In the same way, the number ##0## is a limiting value of ##0.1##, ##0.01##, ##0.001##, ..., but all these numbers are positive while ##0## is not. So a limiting value does not need to have the same properties as the elements of the sequence. The ancient Greeks might have considered the circle a polygon with infinite sides, but this is not done anymore. One of the reasons why not is that we have not really defined what a "polygon with infinite sides" is. Furthermore, the notion can be confusing to people, so we choose not to use it. 


#4
May1014, 03:54 PM

P: 55

Considering a circle to be an infinite sided ngon
it seems, to me, arbitrary that a circle is not a polygon because the definition of a polygon is finite sides. perhaps im not grasping this, but if we changed the definitions around a little couldnt we fit a circle into the same category as regular polygons?
dont get me wrong, im not on some crusade to get circles to be considered regular polygons... im just very interested in the idea that you COULD categorize a circle in with the rest of the regular polygons im really looking for something bulletproof like the angles of a circle must be 180 degrees and thats impossible and thats why a circle cant be a regular polygon. not just "our definitions dont quite allow that" sorry if im being ignorant but i cant help it :p 


#5
May1014, 03:59 PM

P: 55

i think im being very straightforward with this question? 


#6
May1014, 04:01 PM

Mentor
P: 18,345




#7
May1014, 04:55 PM

Engineering
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 7,298




#8
May1114, 12:19 AM

P: 55

to be it seems straightforward that if you imagine what would happen if a polygon had infinite sides itd be perfectly curved no matter how close u zoomed in while a polygon with finite sides might look round from far away, but you get closer and u see the angles 


#9
May1114, 12:23 AM

P: 55

a circles definition is: the set of points equidistant to a single point. this is an infinite set of points. each point is a vertice, is it not? 


#10
May1114, 12:41 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 839




#11
May1114, 08:51 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,810

Toying with definitions, you could just say each "side" of the circle as a polygon has length 0, with initial and end point in the same vertex, for every point on the circle. I don't see the point of this though.



#12
May1114, 11:22 AM

P: 508

You use phrases like "into infinity" and "go on forever" in regards to the proposed limiting process that leads to what you're calling a regular polygon with infinite sides. This leads me to believe that the object that you're proposing has countably many sides, since the countable cardinal is the limit of the finite cardinals. I reckon you'd say that each side of your infinitesided polygon has length 0, in which case the perimeter of your object must also be 0.



#13
May1114, 11:48 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,810




#14
May1114, 01:20 PM

P: 508




#15
May1114, 01:37 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 3,289

There are many cases where an object obtained as the limit of a sequence of other objects does not share the same properties as those objects.
For example, the limit of a sequence of continuous functions may be discontinuous. No one would suggest calling it continuous just because it is the limit of a sequence of continuous functions. So it's not clear to me why you want to call a circle a polygon just because it can be considered as a limit of a sequence of polygons. 


#16
May1114, 03:09 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 1,810




#17
May1114, 04:42 PM

P: 366

We should have an FAQ for this, similar threads pop up every week.



#18
May1114, 11:31 PM

P: 55




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Epsilondelta proof of one sided infinite limit.  Calculus & Beyond Homework  3  
Help change 6sided dice circuit to 20sided  Electrical Engineering  2  
One sided noise spectral density VS double sided noise spectral density  General Engineering  1  
The circle with center infinity with infinite radius is the point zero on the complex  Calculus & Beyond Homework  0  
Circle has infinite sides how many sides does a semi circle have?  General Math  3 