Register to reply

Charge Conjugate of the Vacuum

by ChrisVer
Tags: charge, conjugate, vacuum
Share this thread:
May15-14, 12:43 PM
P: 1,021
What is the result of the charge conjugation acting on the state of vacuum?
I have two intuitive problems.... If I see the vacuum as something which has no particles, then the charge conjugate would have to lead in the vacuum itself...


However, if I think of the vacuum as the state on which creation operators act to create states, the above result doesn't seem correct. For example I would guess that the C acting on the vacuum would create a new vacuum:

On which now the creation operators will act destructively (because they would have to create particle in the antiparticle vacuum- the exact opposite of destruction operator acting on the initial vacuum).... On the other hand the destruction operators will bring out antiparticle states....

I am seeing the creation operators as particles and destruction operators as antiparticles, since they propagate (in momentum space) to opposite directions...

Which is correct (I already know it's the 1st) and more importantly, why?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
'Squid skin' metamaterials project yields vivid color display
Team finds elusive quantum transformations near absolute zero
Scientists control surface tension to manipulate liquid metals (w/ Video)
May15-14, 01:09 PM
P: 881
C|0> = |0> in a theory with charge conjugation invariance.

I think maybe you are a little confused about creation/annihilation operators and particles/antiparticles. There are separate creation/annihilation operators for particles and antiparticles. C swaps the particle creation operators with the antiparticle creation operators, and similarly for the annihilation operators. |0> is annihilated by both particle and antiparticle annihilation operators.

For example, let ##a^\dagger## create particles and ##b^\dagger## create antiparticles. The charge conjugation operator obeys ##C a^\dagger C = b^\dagger## and ##C b^\dagger C = a^\dagger## and ##CC = 1##. Then if we act on a state of a single particle with ##C##, we get a state of one antiparticle, as expected:

##C a^\dagger | 0 \rangle = C a^\dagger CC | 0 \rangle = b^\dagger C | 0 \rangle = b^\dagger |0\rangle##.

Note that we used the fact that ##C|0\rangle = |0\rangle##.
May15-14, 04:00 PM
Sci Advisor
Bill_K's Avatar
P: 4,160
Quote Quote by The_Duck View Post
C|0> = |0> in a theory with charge conjugation invariance.
Yes, bearing this in mind...

Quote Quote by Jauch and Rohrlich, p277
C|0> = |0> states that the charge parity of the vacuum is even. This is consistent with the definition of the vacuum state, but it is an arbitrary convention. We could just as well assume a vacuum state of odd charge parity. Then the charge parity of all other states would be reversed. There is no observable difference between the two assumptions.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Conjugate fields and conjugate subgroups of an automorphism group Linear & Abstract Algebra 1
Charge Conjugate Dirac Field Quantum Physics 8
Electrostatic potential of unit charge in vacuum Introductory Physics Homework 2
Charge Conjugation Invariance of the Vacuum Beyond the Standard Model 0
Vacuum theory; mass and charge General Physics 20