Injective Function: Cubic Function Real Numbers?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jackson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Injective
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether a cubic function is injective for all real numbers, exploring definitions and conditions related to injectivity in the context of cubic functions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that a cubic function is injective.
  • Another participant argues that the injectivity of a cubic function depends on its specific form, noting that the function f(x) = x^3 + bx^2 + cx + d is injective if its derivative f'(x) = 3x^2 + 2bx + c never changes sign.
  • This participant provides examples, stating that f(x) = x^3 is injective, while f(x) = x^3 - x is not injective due to its derivative changing sign.
  • A further point is made that for a function to have an inverse, it must be bijective, which includes being injective.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the discussion, indicating they are struggling with first-year mathematics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether all cubic functions are injective, as differing definitions and examples lead to varying conclusions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the specific form of the cubic function and the conditions under which injectivity is determined, including the behavior of the derivative.

jackson
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
is a cubic function injective for all real numbers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes it's an injective function.
 
depends on your definition of a "cubic function".

the function f(x) = x^3 + bx^2 + cx + d, could be considred a cubic function.

it is injective if and only if the derivative f'(x) = 3x^2 + 2bx + c never changes sign.

e.g. f(x) = x^3 is injective because f'(x) = 3x^2 is never negative.

but f(x) = x^3 - x is not injective because f'(x) = 3x^2 - 1 is positive for x = 1 and negative for x = 0.
 
Also because to have an inverse function [itex]f^{-1} (x)[/itex] it must be bijective (injective and surjective).
 
Well Thx A Great Deal Guys I'm Struggling With First Year Maths And This Site Really Helps, Thx A Million
 

Similar threads

MHB Determining if a function is injective
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Undergrad Derivative of this function is injective everywhere
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Undergrad Proving Continuous Functions in Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Undergrad Oddity of a functional equation for the R zeta function
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Undergrad Ambiguity of the term "indefinite integral"
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Undergrad Closed Form for Complex Gamma Function
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
MHB Why Extraneous Solutions Occur w/ Equations & Injective Functions
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Undergrad On injectivity of two-sided Laplace transform
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Undergrad Algebraic property of real numbers
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
Undergrad Proof involving functional graphs and the injective property
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K