Function Group vs. Mechanisms approach (Organic Chemistry)

In summary, the conversation is discussing different methodologies for tackling mechanism and prediction questions in organic chemistry. One individual prefers a mechanism-based approach, while also considering the type and reactivity of the starting material. They also mention determining the rate limiting step and theoretical yields of isomers produced.
  • #1
bacte2013
398
47
Hello!

For those who took (or have been taking) the organic chemistry, which methodology do you prefer to tackle the mechanism and prediction questions? I have been reading Loudon & Wade (functional group-based) and Clayden (mechanism-based), but I feel like the mechanism-based approach is more useful when predicting the organic reactions...I am just curious about your opinions...

Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #2
I guess it would be a combination of sorts. First would be the question is this an Sn1, Sn2, E1, or E2. From there you get a good idea of the role each reactant. Next, I like to remind myself of what type of starting material is this reaction is describing (i.e. Aldehyde, ketone, amine, ether, etc.); and is it primary, secondary, or tertiary. From there you can determine the rate limiting step of the reaction and subsequently the theoretical yields of each isomer produced. Is this what you are asking?
 

1. What is the difference between the function group approach and the mechanisms approach in organic chemistry?

The function group approach in organic chemistry focuses on the classification and identification of molecules based on their functional groups, which are specific groups of atoms that determine the chemical and physical properties of a compound. On the other hand, the mechanisms approach focuses on understanding how molecules undergo chemical reactions by studying the step-by-step processes and intermediates involved.

2. Which approach is more commonly used in organic chemistry?

The function group approach is more commonly used in organic chemistry as it allows for a more efficient and systematic classification and identification of compounds. However, both approaches are important and often used together to fully understand the properties and reactions of organic molecules.

3. What are some examples of functional groups?

Some examples of functional groups include alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, esters, amines, and amides. These groups can be identified by their specific chemical structures and can greatly influence the properties and reactivity of a compound.

4. How does the mechanisms approach help in understanding chemical reactions?

The mechanisms approach helps in understanding chemical reactions by providing a detailed understanding of the reactions' steps and intermediates. This allows for the prediction and control of reaction outcomes, as well as the development of new reactions and compounds.

5. Can the function group approach and mechanisms approach be used together?

Yes, the function group approach and mechanisms approach are often used together in organic chemistry. The function group approach provides a classification and identification system, while the mechanisms approach provides a deeper understanding of the reactions and reactivity of organic compounds.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top