Register to reply 
Feynman Diagram setup for 4fermion interaction loop 
Share this thread: 
#1
Jul1514, 05:29 AM

PF Gold
P: 466

If one has a 4fermion vertex, like in Fermi theory : ##G_f (f_1 \Gamma f_2)(l_1 \Gamma l_2)##
And you are calculating a oneloop diagram where you have the diagram of : f1> f2,l1,l2 > f1 (used for dispersive/unitarity approach) Where in the end you'll use Cutkosky rules to calculate it, but ignore this for now. The question is about converting this diagram to an equation, which direction does one go? You can follow fermion flow backward through either of the two forwardarrow propagators, but then what. It matters as there is dirac algebra involved. I assume it has to do with the order of the fermions in your actual interaction term, and when doing the time ordered product of two of these vertices you have to watch for fierz transforming the currents so that its manageable. Is that correct, that I should approach this "diagram" without usign the diagram, but rather a product of currents, timeordered, and do it the long way, fierztransforming the spinor currents so that things simplify? Or is there a prescription for handing this case straight from the diagram. It seems a feynman diagram is not enough to be honest for 4fermion interactions of this sort, as the directions matter, and "going against particle flow" is not enough when you have choices. So you must either sum over all the paths, or do it by hand. Any insight? 


#2
Jul1514, 08:32 AM

P: 305

I'm not sure if I understood your question correctly. However, the Fermi Lagrangian just tells you that, at low energy, the coupling between two fermionic currents is [itex]G_F/\sqrt{2}[/itex]; that's what should appear at every fourfermion vertex. The presence of the Dirac algebra, i.e. of spinors, just tells you that you have to use spinors for the external legs of you diagrams and fermionic propagators for the internal ones.
In your case you need to choose a direction for the loop momenta and then write down the integral correctly (don't forget the additional  sign for every fermionic loop). If, for example, [itex]p[/itex] is the momentum of the incoming/outgoing fermion, you can choose the upper internal line to go from left to right with a momentum [itex]q[/itex], the middle internal line to go from left to right with momentum [itex]pq+k[/itex] and the lower one to go from right to left with momentum [itex]k[/itex]. In this case I would say that you diagram is given by: $$ \left(\frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^2\bar u_L(p)\int \frac{d^4q}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{1}{q^\mu\gamma_\mum}\frac{1}{(pq+k)_\mu \gamma^\mum}\frac{1}{k_\mu \gamma^\mum} u_L(p), $$ where by [itex]u_L(p)[/itex] I mean the lefthanded spinor. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Does path integral and loop integral in a Feynman diagram violate special relativity?  General Physics  0  
Feynman diagram for weak interaction.  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  6  
Feynman diagram for a strong interaction decay  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  2  
Evaluating Feynman diagram in QFT without external fermion lines  Quantum Physics  4  
Four fermion interaction?  Quantum Physics  1 