Is This Logarithmic Simplification Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cscott
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponents
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around logarithmic simplifications and properties, specifically focusing on expressions involving logarithms and algebraic identities. Participants are examining the correctness of logarithmic transformations and exploring proofs related to the equality of two variables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the simplification of logarithmic expressions and question the application of logarithmic properties. There are attempts to prove a relationship between two variables using algebraic manipulation and logarithmic identities.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints and suggestions for further simplification and proof strategies. There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to approach the problems, with no clear consensus on the best path forward.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the constraints of the homework rules, which may limit the types of solutions or methods they can employ. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the placement of exponents in their work.

cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1
Could someone please check my work?

Write as a single logarithm:

[tex]\frac{1}{4}[2(log_2 x + 3 log_2 y) - 3 log_2 z][/tex]

I got [tex]log_2(\frac{x^2y^6}{z^3})^\frac{1}{4}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{3}{5}[\frac{1}{2}(log_2 x + 3 log_2 y) - 2(log_2 x - 4 log_2 y)][/tex]

I got [tex]log_2 (\frac{x^\frac{1}{2}y^{1.5}}{x^2} \cdot y^8)^\frac{3}{5}[/tex]

I'd also appreciate some hints on the following:

[tex]a^2 + b^2 = 2ab[/tex]
prove
[tex]log (\frac{a + b}{2} = \frac{1}{2}(log a + log b)[/tex]

The part I really don't get is where the exponents go...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
first part is perfect although you could get rid of the 1/4 power by looking at the third equation I gave you for the second problem

the second could be simplified further by noting that

[tex]\frac{a^m}{a^n} = a^{m-n}[/tex]

[tex]a^m * a^n = a^{m+n}[/tex]

[tex]{(a^m)}^n = a^{mn}[/tex]

for the third, note that

[tex](a + b)^2 = a^2 +2ab + b^2[/tex]

can you do the rest?
 
Last edited:
Work looks fine.


Suppose that
[tex]a^2 + b^2 = 2ab[/tex]
<==>
[tex]a^2 - 2ab + b^2 = 0[/tex]
<==>
[tex](a - b)^2 = 0[/tex]
then what can we say about a and b?
 
the above hint will work, but in a kind of backwards way... its easier (and more direct) to come up with an expression for (a+b)/2 and use the properties of logs
 
JFo said:
the above hint will work, but in a kind of backwards way... its easier (and more direct) to come up with an expression for (a+b)/2 and use the properties of logs

And by above you're referring to your own? If that is the case, I wouldn't agree with you.
 
no I was referring to your hint
 
JFo said:
no I was referring to your hint

Ok, but using my hint one don't have to use any properties of logarithms..
 
true, but going that route bypasses what I think the exercise is meant to do, considering the context of the first two questions.

but I'll let the OP decide what method to use.
 
[tex]a^{2}+b^{2}=2 ab[/tex]

Add [itex]2ab[/itex] to it:

[tex](a+b)^{2}=4ab[/tex]

You can get

[tex]\frac{a+b}{2}=\pm (ab)^{\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Choose the "+" sign in the RHS,so you won't get imaginary numbers.

Daniel.
 
  • #10
yeah...what dextercioby did was what I had in mind
 
  • #11
JFo said:
first part is perfect although you could get rid of the 1/4 power by looking at the third equation I gave you for the second problem

the second could be simplified further by noting that

[tex]\frac{a^m}{a^n} = a^{m-n}[/tex]

[tex]a^m * a^n = a^{m+n}[/tex]

[tex]{(a^m)}^n = a^{mn}[/tex]

for the third, note that

[tex](a + b)^2 = a^2 +2ab + b^2[/tex]

can you do the rest?


I fixed up my first two answer, but I don't understand why you add a^2 and b^2 to the right side for the third. I think I see how I can do it now, though:

[tex](a + b)^2 = 2ab[/tex]
[tex]\frac{(a + b)^2}{2} = ab[/tex]
[tex]2 log (\frac{a + b}{2}) = log a + log b[/tex]
[tex]log (\frac{a + b}{2}) = \frac{1}{2}(log a + log b)[/tex]

dextercioby: I see where you're going, but can you explain more how you got the last step?
 
  • #12
By taking sq.root from both sides of the equation ??That's how the "+-" got there.

And your post is completely wrong.

Daniel.
 
  • #13
cscott said:
I fixed up my first two answer, but I don't understand why you add a^2 and b^2 to the right side for the third. I think I see how I can do it now, though:

[tex](a + b)^2 = 2ab[/tex]
[tex]\frac{(a + b)^2}{2} = ab[/tex]
[tex]2 log (\frac{a + b}{2}) = log a + log b[/tex]
[tex]log (\frac{a + b}{2}) = \frac{1}{2}(log a + log b)[/tex]

[tex](a + b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 + 2ab[/tex]

the above equation is true for any 2 real numbers a and b. [to verify, just multiply out (a+b)(a+b)]

They told you that [itex]a^2 + b^2 = 2ab[/itex], substituting this into the first equation you get

[tex](a + b)^2 = 4ab[/tex]

taking the square root of both sides, you get

[tex](a+b) = 2(ab)^{\frac{1}{2}}[/tex]

(we take the positive root, because the log of a negative number is not defined)

divide both sides by two and

[tex]\frac{a+b}{2} = (ab)^{\frac{1}{2}}[/tex]

take the log of both sides and... (fill in rest)
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K