Rotation of coordinates (context of solving simple PDE)

In summary, when rotating a rectangular coordinate system (x,y) so that the rotated x'-axis is parallel to a vector (a,b), the equations for the new coordinates (x',y') are x'=ax+by and y'=bx-ay. This is used in solving PDEs and can also result in an expansion or shrinking depending on the values of a and b. However, for a pure rotation, the values of a and b must satisfy a^2+b^2=1 and the rotation angle \theta can be calculated using x'=cos(\theta)x+sin(\theta)y and y'=sin(\theta)x-cos(\theta)y.
  • #1
chipotleaway
174
0
If you rotate your rectangular coordinate system (x,y) so that the rotated x'-axis is parallel to a vector (a,b), in terms of the (x,y) why is it given by

x'=ax+by
y'=bx-ay

I got x'=ay-bx, y'=by+ax from y=(b/a)x.

By the way this is from solving the PDE aux+buy=0 by making one of the partial derivatives disappear. The general solution I got from this change of variables is u(ay-bx) rather than u(bx-ay) - is u(ay-bx) wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
chipotleaway said:
y=(b/a)x

This is the equation of the x' axis, i.e, it is the equation for y' = 0.
 
  • #3
So I need an arbitrary constant?
 
  • #4
My lecturer did the change of coordinates for a more general constant coefficient PDE [itex]\sum_{j=1}^n a_j\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_j}=b(x,u)[/itex] in n-variables by defining the new variables as:

[itex]y_1=\frac{x_1}{a_1}[/itex]
and
[itex]y_j=x_j-\frac{a_j}{a_1}x_1[/itex]

How do you get this?
 
  • #5
Strictly speaking, x'= ax+ by, y'= bx- ay does NOT give a rotation.

If [itex]a^2+ b^2> 1[/itex] there will be both a rotation and an expansion. If [itex]a^2+ b^2< 1[/itex] there will be both a rotation and a shrinking It is only when [itex]a^2+ b^2= 1[/itex] that x'= ax+ by, y'= bx- ay gives a pure rotation.

One can show that a rotation, counterclockwise, about the origin, through angle [itex]\theta[/itex] is given by [itex]x'= cos(\theta)x+ sin(\theta)y[/itex], [itex]y'= sin(\theta)x- cos(\theta) y[/itex]. In your formulation, "a" must be [itex]cos(\theta)[/itex] and "b" must be [itex]sin(\theta)[/itex] where [itex]\theta[/itex] is the angle rotated through.
 

What is the purpose of rotating coordinates in solving simple PDE?

Rotating coordinates allows us to transform a PDE into a simpler form, making it easier to solve. This is particularly helpful when the PDE has complicated boundary conditions or coefficients.

How does rotating coordinates affect the PDE?

Rotating coordinates changes the variables in the PDE, which can lead to simplification or elimination of certain terms. This can make the PDE easier to solve, or reveal hidden symmetries that can be used to find a solution.

What are the steps involved in rotating coordinates to solve a PDE?

The steps involved in rotating coordinates to solve a PDE are: 1) Identify the coordinate system to be rotated; 2) Choose a rotation angle; 3) Write out the transformation equations for the coordinates; 4) Apply the transformation to the PDE and its boundary conditions; 5) Simplify the resulting PDE; and 6) Solve the simplified PDE using traditional methods.

Can rotating coordinates be used for any type of PDE?

Yes, rotating coordinates can be used for any type of PDE, as long as the coordinate system can be rotated. However, it may not always lead to a simplified or easier to solve PDE, so it is important to carefully choose the rotation angle and coordinate system.

Are there any limitations or drawbacks to using rotating coordinates in solving PDEs?

One limitation of rotating coordinates is that it may not always lead to a simplified PDE. In some cases, it may even make the PDE more complicated. Additionally, rotating coordinates may not be applicable to PDEs with special boundary conditions or coefficients that cannot be transformed. It is important to carefully consider the applicability and potential benefits before using rotating coordinates in solving a PDE.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
225
  • General Math
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
762
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top