Is a Virtual Photon Flux the Same as Ether?

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of the ether and its relation to the theory of relativity and the total energy of an atom. Nobel Laureate Robert Laughlin explains that while the idea of a medium, or ether, is often associated with opposition to relativity, it actually aligns with the modern understanding of the vacuum as a relativistic ether. Steven Weinsberg adds that in order to account for the measured values of an electron's mass and charge, the bare mass and charge must be infinite, resulting in an infinite total energy of the atom due to contributions from virtual photons.
  • #1
Deco56
21
0
Hi,

I have a thought experiment I'd like to share along with a couple of quotes. First, we consider the moment when a body goes from have exactly zero charge to a +Q charge. At that moment, by definition of E field a distance r from point charge q, we have a field propagating from point source to infinity, for an infinite amount of time. For this E-field tension to reach a certain distance, there must be a energy influx into the charge because there is the E-field expansion and those carry energy with them as they expand. Now from particle physics we now know that the source of energy is the "virtual photon flux" which is in constant energy exchange with the charge. So what is exactly different from the idea of a virtual photon flux or ether? Some may reference MM experiment, but that does not completely exclude the ether.

Now, a few quotes:

Nobel Laureate Robert Laughlin:

"It is ironic that Einstein's most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed ...

The word 'ether' has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. ... Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry.

It turns out that such matter exists. About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo."

Steven Weinsberg:

"[The total energy of the atom] depends on the bare mass and bare charge of the electron, the mass and charge that appear in the equations of the theory before we start worrying about photon emissions and reabsorptions. But free electrons as well as electrons in atoms are always emitting and reabsorbing photons that affect the electron's mass and electric charge, and so the bare mass and charge are not the same as the measured electron mass and charge that are listed in tables of elementary particles. In fact, in order to account for the observed values (which of course are finite) of the mass and charge of the electron, the bare mass and charge must themselves be infinite. The total energy of the atom is thus the sum of two terms, both infinite: the bare energy that is infinite because it depends on the infinite bare mass and charge, and the energy shift … that is infinite because it receives contributions from virtual photons of unlimited energy."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Thread closed for Moderation...
 

1. What is the difference between ether and virtual photon flux?

The concept of ether and virtual photon flux are often confused, but they are actually quite different. Ether refers to a hypothetical medium that was believed to exist in the past as a medium for light to travel through. Virtual photon flux, on the other hand, is a concept in quantum field theory that describes the exchange of virtual photons between particles.

2. Does ether or virtual photon flux have any physical evidence?

No, there is currently no physical evidence for either ether or virtual photon flux. The idea of ether has been disproven by experiments such as the Michelson-Morley experiment, and virtual photon flux is a theoretical concept that has not been directly observed.

3. Can ether or virtual photon flux be detected?

As mentioned before, ether has been disproven and therefore cannot be detected. Virtual photon flux, being a theoretical concept, also cannot be directly detected. However, the effects of virtual photon exchange can be observed through experiments and calculations in quantum field theory.

4. How does the existence of ether or virtual photon flux affect our understanding of the universe?

The existence of ether was once believed to be necessary for understanding the properties of light, but its disproval led to the development of new theories such as special relativity. Virtual photon flux, while not directly observable, is essential for understanding the interactions between subatomic particles and plays a crucial role in our understanding of the universe at a quantum level.

5. Is there ongoing research on ether or virtual photon flux?

There is no current research on ether, as it has been largely rejected by the scientific community. However, there is ongoing research on virtual photon flux and its implications in quantum field theory. Scientists are continuously studying and refining our understanding of this concept in order to better understand the fundamental interactions of particles in the universe.

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
361
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
29
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
825
Replies
1
Views
835
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
994
  • Electromagnetism
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
774
Back
Top