Register to reply 
Newton's third law in ropes and tension 
Share this thread: 
#1
Aug614, 11:12 AM

P: 78

For some reason I couldn't answer this, and I hope you can help me:
a) Two people pull on a rope, one with 200 N , the other 100 N. Why is the tension on the rope the shared magnitude of both forces? b) If two people pull on a rope with equal force (say, 100 N), each person pulling feels their own force (Newton's 3rd law) plus the force the other guy exerts. Why is the tension not 200 N then? c) If you could also explain what really happens in (b) with another combination of forces (nonequal), addressing how newton's third law works in that case, I'd appreciate it very much. (say, 200 N and 100 N). Thank you very much. 


#2
Aug614, 11:22 AM

Mentor
P: 41,555




#3
Aug614, 11:27 AM

P: 843

If two people pull on a rope, the first pulls with 100 N and the second pulls back with 200 N, then the first person will probably fall down. They need to both be pulling with the same force (e.g., 200 N) but in opposite directions to keep the rope stationary between them. 


#4
Aug614, 11:30 AM

P: 78

Newton's third law in ropes and tension
Why can't a massless rope have a net force? I know it's a little bit weird because of F=m*a but without caring much about how it's accelerating why can't we say it has a net force? I think this is what happens in the atwood problems from typical physics exercises where unequal weights are hanging on each side.
Also, you're saying the felt tension is only equal to the reactive force? What I mean by shared magnitude is that if one person exerts 200 N and the other 100 N the tension is only 100 N because that's the magnitude they both share. That's what I read somewhere else (in another forum). Is this problem hard because it's suggesting something which isn't really possible? 


#5
Aug614, 11:33 AM

P: 843

If you care about the acceleration of some dangling weight, then you can at least say the mass of the rope is "negligibly small" compared to the weight. 


#6
Aug614, 11:36 AM

P: 78

Ok so assuming a rope with mass held between two astronauts in space, and one astronaut pulls with 200 N while the other pulls 100 N. What happens to the system? To each astronaut? To the rope?
Also, I'm interested in what made you think the scenario was impossible for the massless rope. I know it was the fact that it's massless, but I'd like to know what you think would've happened that made you say this was unreal. Thanks. 


#7
Aug614, 11:38 AM

P: 843

I don't think it's possible for the astronauts to pull on the rope with different tensions. I dunno, unless there's something I'm overlooking.
My earlier example might have been a bit misleading: suppose you're holding on to the rope and the other astronaut yanks on it with 200 N. You will have to pull back with 200 N if you plan to keep holding on to the rope. If you both pull on the rope with 200 N then I guess you'll both accelerate toward each other at whatever rate 200 N produces on your respective bodies. 


#8
Aug614, 11:38 AM

Mentor
P: 41,555




#9
Aug614, 11:40 AM

P: 843




#10
Aug614, 11:44 AM

Mentor
P: 41,555




#11
Aug614, 11:50 AM

P: 78

Maybe this question is stupid and I should work out the answer but:
If the tension is just the reactive force, then how can it be the same throughout a rope that holds two unequal weights in an atwood machine, and how could these masses even accelerate? I.e. I'm imagining that since one weight pulls down with Mg and the other mg, tension will just pull back on each side with an equal force that's respective to each mass. Why isn't this the case? 


#12
Aug614, 11:54 AM

P: 843

Yeah so now I think I understand what you're asking.
Think of this: Two weights, each of mass M, connected through pulleys. If the situation is totally stationary then would you agree or disagree that each half of the system is identical to a system with no pulley and the mass M just dangling from a fixed rope? 


#13
Aug614, 11:56 AM

P: 78

I would agree to that.



#14
Aug614, 11:57 AM

Mentor
P: 41,555

Also: If the mass pulled the rope with a force equal to its weight, then by Newton's 3rd law the rope would have to pull up on the mass with an equal force. That would make the net force on the mass always equal to zero! (Of course, if the two masses are equal then the tension would equal their weight. But that's a special case.) 


#15
Aug614, 12:15 PM

P: 843

Okay, so Doc Al has already explained what I was going to say.



#16
Aug614, 03:36 PM

Mentor
P: 17,526

For example, in your 200 N astronaut and 100 N astronaut example, by Newton's 3rd law the net force on the rope would be 100 N. If the rope weighed 10 grams then it would accelerate at 10000 m/s^2. Presumably it would be difficult for an astronaut to accelerate a rope at that rate, so using the massless approximation and ensuring that the forces are equal helps catch little mistakes. 


#17
Aug614, 03:55 PM

P: 78

And would you say the rope in an atwood machine is accelerating? (the rope is massless and unequal masses hang on both sides). Also: Why is the tension in a massless string assumed to be constant all throughout even if its moving like in the case of the atwood pulley?



#18
Aug614, 04:10 PM

P: 994

How does the net force on a section relate to the rate of change of momentum in that section? 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Tension of 2 Ropes  Introductory Physics Homework  4  
Tension problem dealing with 4 ropes and 2 weights (ropes oriented at different angle  Introductory Physics Homework  10  
Tension on the ropes (Equilibrium)  Introductory Physics Homework  1  
Tension in two ropes at angles  Introductory Physics Homework  10  
Tension on ropes  Introductory Physics Homework  5 