Physics Presentation: Explaining Constant Acceleration

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ACLerok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Presentation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around explaining the concept of constant acceleration in the context of an experiment where two objects of different masses fall to the ground simultaneously. Participants explore the principles of free fall, gravitational acceleration, and how to effectively communicate these ideas to an audience with varying levels of interest in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the nature of constant acceleration and whether two objects hitting the ground simultaneously have the same acceleration.
  • Another participant cites a formula indicating that in free-fall motion, objects experience a constant acceleration due to gravity, which is approximately 9.80 m/s².
  • A different contributor notes that while the standard value for gravitational acceleration is 9.81 m/s², variations exist depending on location on Earth, and emphasizes the impact of air resistance on the motion of falling objects.
  • One participant explains the gravitational force between two masses using the equation F=GMm/r², and derives the acceleration due to gravity, suggesting that it can be calculated using known constants.
  • Another participant suggests that to effectively explain these concepts to a non-scientific audience, one should thoroughly understand the material and explore various sources for different explanations.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationships expressed in physics formulas to aid in explaining them to others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the nature of gravitational acceleration and the effects of air resistance, indicating that there is no consensus on the best way to explain these concepts or the implications of different factors involved.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about air resistance and the ideal conditions for free fall, which may not hold true in all scenarios. The derivation of gravitational acceleration relies on specific values for mass and distance that may vary.

ACLerok
Messages
194
Reaction score
0
I found your website when looking for some help eith Physics.
November I have to make a presentation involving an experiment in
which two objects of different mass will hit the ground
simultaneously. The motion of these two objects is constant
acceleration correct? How would I easily explain why this is true to
someone? Also, since the objects hit the ground simultaneously, do
they have the same acceleration?? How would I find it? Thanks and i
hope you get the chance to help me out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a start:

My little book of formulas says, "In free-fall motion, an object experiences negligible air resistance and a constant acceleration due to gravity.

All objects in free fall at the same location above the Earth have the same acceleration due to gravity.

The acceleration due to gravity is a vector that points toward the center of the Earth and is denoted by the symbol g. Near the surface of the earth, g has a magnitude that is approximately constant and is given by

g=9.80 m/s2 or 32.2 ft/s2.
 
The canonical figure to two sig. figures is 9.81 ms-2,zoobyshoes (though of course it varies across the Earth's surface, but 9.81 will be correct for most places on the Earth).


Use the formula:

s = ut + ½at2

this means that if the inital velocity, u and the displacemnet s, is the same then if they take the same time they must of had the same acceleration. The motion of these two objects won't quite be constant accelarion due to drag, but if you try to eliminate as much drag as you can by using heavy objects with a small surface area, then you needn't worry too much about it.
 
Last edited:
In General 2 bodies with mass have a force of gravity given by the equation

F=GMm/r2

Where G is the gravitational constant
G=6.67e-11 Nm2/kg2

M= Mass of body 1 (let this be the mass of the earth)
m= mass of body 2 (let this be the mass of something on the surface of the earth.

r is the distance between the centers of mass. let us call this the radius of the earth.

Newton gave us F=ma, this is the relationship between the mass of a body, the force acting on it and the resulting acceleration. A body of mass m on the surface of the Earth has a gravitational force exerted on it by the first equation, if we use that as the force in Newtons law we get

GMm/r2= ma

now m is the same on each side so we can cancel it out resulting in

a =GM/r2

Notice that all of the factors on the right are constant, to find a simply compute the value on the left side. This is the quantity we call g.
I have given you G, you should be able to find values for the other quantities (Mass and radius of the earth) be sure that they are expressed in the same units as the value for G (that is kg and meters).
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by ACLerok
How would I easily explain why this is true to someone?
I suppose you are talking about an audience that isn't necessarily interested in physics, because you ask how it can be "easily" explained. The important first step is to make sure you understand it backwards and forwards yourself.
One strategy I have for this is to go to the library and compare how the same information is presented in as many different sources as I can. In this instance I'd pull all the physics textbooks they have down and read what each says on the acceleration of gravity. Encyclopedias, too.

I like the way Integral referred to Newton II as a "relationship". This is an important thing to be conscious of when you're trying to grasp, or trying to explain, what any formula is about: it expresses how the different values relate to each other. The better you understand that relationship the easier it is to explain it to a non-scientific person, in language they can understand.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K