Social Physics: A New Theory of Human Social Interaction

  • Thread starter microsansfil
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Physics
In summary: There is definitely potential for this field, but it still has a ways to go before it can really be called a "science".In summary, the concept of "social physics" is a new theory that claims to be able to predict human behavior based on large data sets. It has been used by different people in the past, but has yet to show any real progress.
  • #1
microsansfil
325
43
Hello,

Is it a new theory of human social interaction, based on the concept of big data ?

http://socialphysics.media.mit.edu/

Patrick
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No - but it does appear to claim to be a new specialist field in social sciences. Sort of.
The hope is that having lots of data will produce predictive models for human behavior.
Sounds like marketing and I see the links all seem to go to "media" dot MIT.
Is anyone doing it outside MIT?
 
  • #3
Simon Bridge said:
Is anyone doing it outside MIT?
Sandy Pentland: "Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread" seems to be the author of this notion

Patrick
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Pentland certainly seems to be the latest to popularize the term - he's with the "media" people group at MIT.
He's also done some work on social networks.

I don't think the field has a journal so far though.
Where does Sandy generally publish?
 
  • #5
Simon Bridge said:
Where does Sandy generally publish?
Good question. I do not know this person. Even so, "Social Physics" (not social big data) seem to have a long history.

Patrick
 
  • #6
The term has been used to mean different things through history.
I don't think the "human thermodynamics" site is a good source to use - it raises too many red flags for "crackpot".

Try:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auguste_Comte
... August Comte used "socail physics" to mean the same thing as "sociology" ... the second word he used after the first was appropriated by others.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolphe_Quetelet
... for the related use to describe the use of statistical methods in social sciences.
Closer to the use by Pentland. However, the historical uses should be understood in context.
 
  • #7
Simon Bridge said:
The term has been used to mean different things through history.
I don't think the "human thermodynamics" site is a good source to use - it raises too many red flags for "crackpot".
Ok

I do not know this site. I found it by chance. The content on this particular point "Social Physics" seemed to me credible.

I agree, always keep a critical reading. Especially when we have no knowledge on the subject

Simon Bridge said:
Try:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auguste_Comte
... August Comte used "socail physics" to mean the same thing as "sociology" ... the second word he used after the first was appropriated by others.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolphe_Quetelet
... for the related use to describe the use of statistical methods in social sciences.
Closer to the use by Pentland. However, the historical uses should be understood in context.

Thank

Patrick
 
  • #8
I guess even political scientists nowadays are more motivated to analyse their objects of study based on large data - it appears to be the newst trend in the field. However, this has still to show any real progress. What you mainly have in such fields are very simple models with virtually no predictive power. This happens partially because people in these fields did not receive the appropriate trainning to deal with mathematical modeling and large data sets, and partially because social behavior is affected by so many variables that it is hard to believe that anyone would have taken all of them into consideration.

I am pretty sure that you can find people working in this kind of approach in the Sociology, Antrophology, Economics and Political Science departments of big Universities.
 
  • #9
It's mainly because it is easy to publish such theories in social science journals.
Prev. though there was a larger tendency to concentrate on qualitative research, so it's probably a move in the right direction (i.e. towards a harder form of science.)
 

What is social physics?

Social physics is a new theory that seeks to understand human social interactions using quantitative and computational methods. It views society as a complex system and applies principles from physics and other natural sciences to study social phenomena.

What are the key concepts of social physics?

The key concepts of social physics include the idea that individuals' behaviors and decisions are influenced by their social environment, the importance of social networks and their structure, and the role of information and communication in shaping social dynamics.

How is social physics different from other social sciences?

Social physics is different from other social sciences in its use of data-driven and mathematical approaches to understand social behavior. It also places a strong emphasis on the role of networks and information in shaping social interactions, which is not as central in other fields.

What are some applications of social physics?

Social physics has a wide range of potential applications, from understanding and predicting collective behavior, to improving communication and decision-making processes in organizations, to designing more efficient and effective social systems.

What are some criticisms of social physics?

Some criticisms of social physics include its reductionist view of human behavior, its focus on quantitative data at the expense of qualitative insights, and its potential to oversimplify or oversell the complexity of human social interactions.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
936
  • General Discussion
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
815
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
711
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
814
  • General Discussion
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
280
Back
Top