Tetraquark States: Exploring Beyond the Quark Model

  • Thread starter Safinaz
  • Start date
  • Tags
    States
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of "tetraquarks" or four-quark states and the different models that have been developed to explain them, including a compact tetraquark model, a meson molecule model, a hadro-charmonium model, and a hybrid model. The speaker also expresses their opinion that understanding the nature of these exotic mesons is an exciting and challenging task that may lead to new discoveries in particle physics.
  • #1
Safinaz
259
8
Hi all,

I were wonder how the particles which consisting of four quarks like Z(4430) state ( ##c\bar{c}d\bar{u}## ) can be theoretically explained ?

Of course, this is beyond the the quark model, where the SU(3) group has for example, representations with dimensions 3 (corresponding to baryons), 8 (octets) ,10 (decuplets), and etc.. So what are the other alternative scenarios to accommodates these exotic particles, are
there theories assuming a group like SU(4) ?

Bests,
S.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
When you talk about "tetraquarks" you usually refer to "four-quark states". There are different models going on that try to explain these "exotic mesons". However, none of them assumes any new group usually, it's all withing the Standard Model.

The main models developed during the years are:

1) "Compact tetraquark": exactly as mesons and baryons are made by [itex]q\bar q[/itex] and [itex]qqq[/itex], you can build objects made by [itex]qq\bar q\bar q[/itex]. In fact, from a group theory point of view quarks belong to the representation [itex]3[/itex] of [itex]SU(3)_{color}[/itex] while anti-quarks belong to the [itex]\bar 3[/itex]. Now, it is well-known (see for example the one-gluon-exchange approximation) that you can bind two quarks together in a [itex]\bar 3[/itex] representation (in fact [itex]3\times 3=\bar 3+6[/itex]) and this configuration is attractive. You can also do the same thing for two anti-quarks in a [itex]3[/itex], forming the so-called (anti-)diquarks. Binding the diquark and the anti-diquark together you can obtain a colorless structure [itex][qq]_{\bar 3}[\bar q\bar q]_3\to [qq\bar q\bar q]_1[/itex].
The problem with this model is that, even if it can nicely explain the current spectrum of exotic mesons, it also predicts a bunch of other exotic particles that have not been seen yet.

2) "Meson molecule": nothing but two mesons bound together in a molecule via strong forces. For example a [itex]DD^*[/itex] bound state. The problem with this model is that it requires for the mass of the exotic meson to be close to the sum of the masses of the components of the molecule (in order not to have a too large binding energy). Not all the observed exotic particles lie reasonably close to this threshold.

3) "Hadro-charmonium": the idea is smilar to that of an ordinary atom. You can have a nucleus composed by an ordinary charmonium (for example a [itex]J/\psi[/itex]) sorrounded by a "cloud" of light quarks with the same quantum numbers of a light meson (for example a pion). The interaction between the nucleus and the cloud would be via a residual strong Van Der Waals force.

4) "Hybrid": I honestly don't know much about this model. If I remember correctly it assumes for the particle to be composed by two valence quarks and a valence gluon. But I'm not sure.

I hope this is clear enough and answers your question.
In my opinion the question about the nature of these "exotic mesons" is one of the most interesting and exciting in nowadays particle physics. The beautiful aspect is that is it strongly contrained by data and hence developing a model that properly describes all the properties of this particles is a very hard task. People should probably put a little more effort in solving this problem... we still don't know if it might contain new physics.
 
  • #3
Yes .. thanks, that's helped me in understanding ..
 

1. What are tetraquark states?

Tetraquark states are hypothetical particles composed of four quarks. In the standard model of particle physics, quarks are thought to be the fundamental building blocks of matter, and they combine to form particles such as protons and neutrons. However, tetraquark states go beyond this model, as they consist of four quarks bound together by the strong nuclear force.

2. How are tetraquark states different from other particles?

Tetraquark states are different from other particles because they have a unique combination of four quarks, whereas most particles are composed of only two or three quarks. This means that tetraquark states have different properties and behaviors compared to other particles, and studying them can provide insight into the strong nuclear force and the nature of matter.

3. What is the significance of studying tetraquark states?

Studying tetraquark states can help us better understand the fundamental forces and particles that make up our universe. It can also potentially lead to the discovery of new particles and help us refine our understanding of the standard model of particle physics. Additionally, tetraquark states have potential applications in fields such as nuclear energy and medical imaging.

4. How are scientists exploring tetraquark states?

Scientists are exploring tetraquark states through experiments at particle accelerators, such as the Large Hadron Collider. These experiments involve colliding particles at high energies and analyzing the resulting data to search for evidence of tetraquark states. Theoretical physicists also use mathematical models and simulations to study the properties and behaviors of these particles.

5. Have tetraquark states been observed in experiments?

There have been several experiments that have reported evidence of tetraquark states, but further research is needed to confirm their existence. Some scientists believe that the observed phenomena could be explained by other particles or processes, and the nature of tetraquark states is still a subject of ongoing research and debate in the scientific community.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top