Purchase Uranium Ore - Is it Safe? | United Nuclear

  • Thread starter Thread starter theCandyman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uranium
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the safety and implications of purchasing uranium ore from the website United Nuclear. Participants explore the radiation levels associated with the ore, the methods of measurement, and the historical uses of uranium in various applications. The conversation includes technical details about radiation detection and the properties of uranium ore.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the safety and purpose of selling uranium ore, suggesting it may be a novelty item marketed at inflated prices.
  • Another participant provides information on the composition of uranium ore, noting the presence of U-235 and U-238, and discusses its historical use in glassmaking.
  • A participant shares personal experience with purchasing radioactive minerals, indicating that better deals may exist elsewhere.
  • There is a technical discussion about the conversion of counts per minute (CPM) to disintegrations per minute (DPM) and the conditions necessary for accurate conversion, including detector efficiency and geometry.
  • Some participants clarify that CPM is not directly convertible to curies without knowing specific detector parameters, while others argue that with the right efficiency data, such conversions can be made.
  • One participant emphasizes that the intrinsic properties of the radioactive material are what determine DPM, not the detection method.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the safety and purpose of purchasing uranium ore, with some questioning the legitimacy of the sales while others provide technical insights into radiation measurement. The discussion on the conversion of CPM to DPM and curies remains contested, with no consensus reached on the methodology.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about radiation detection methods and the properties of uranium ore, which may not be fully resolved. There are also references to specific literature that may influence the understanding of the conversion processes discussed.

theCandyman
Messages
397
Reaction score
2
Has anyone run across this site before? I found it long ago, but I am not sure why I found it and I just bumped into it again.

http://www.unitednuclear.com/uranium.htm

It is selling uranium ore from ten thousand counts per minute up to five hundred thousand counts per minute. I calculated this to be [tex]4.5 * 10^{-9}[/tex] to [tex]2.25 * 10^{-7}[/tex] Curies, but that does not seem very high as opposed to what they say on their site ["Low", "Medium", "High" and "Super High Radation Level"]. Is this low number due to it being ore?

Also, under the Radation Measurements part of the site it says they do not measure the alpha emissions, why? It mentions using a "stablized assay meter" instead of a Geiger counter, which I thought was normally used to measure radation, is it not?

Right now, I am just assuming this is a novelty gift group, trying to sell Uranium for inflated prices to unsuspecting buyers who will no doubt store their "Super High" radioactive rock in concrete and lead lined safes and pull out once in a while to impress their friends.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Uranium ore has been used in yellow color glass in the past.

The natural U element can be found with about 0.71% U-235 and much of the rest will be U-238 with a trace of U234. Now in the ore, U will be in the form of U3O8, a higher order oxide than the ceramic UO2, or UO3 with other metal oxides like cupruates, vanadates, and non-metal oxides like carbonates, sulfates, and so on.

See - http://www.dangerouslaboratories.org/radore.html

In ore, the U oxides are few percent. There is a lot of low grade or <1%. One of the highest grades is 13.6% U at Cigar Lake. As a more typical example, Cameco has completed mining at its two open pit mines at Key Lake, where some 24 million pounds of uranium were recovered with an average grade of 1.3 percent U308.

See - http://www.wma-minelife.com/uranium/articles/art316.htm

There may also be traces of radionuclides from the decay process in the ore.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/radser.html#c1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’ve picked up a few different radioactive minerals from various different places, with unitednuclear being one of them. They do get some neat stuff in; however, if you really search around you can find better deals. I have a chunk of uranite would easily fit into their "super high" category and I paid like $65 for it somewhere else.

Also, I don’t think you can convert right from CPM to curies without knowing the efficiency of the detector and the geometry of the setup. The source has isotropic emission (radiation emanates from the source in all directions) so only a certain amount is incident on the detector. Furthermore, gammas can pass right through the detector without interacting.
 
tehfrr said:
Also, I don’t think you can convert right from CPM to curies without knowing the efficiency of the detector and the geometry of the setup. The source has isotropic emission (radiation emanates from the source in all directions) so only a certain amount is incident on the detector. Furthermore, gammas can pass right through the detector without interacting.

tehrr,

The quantity that is convertible to Curies is NOT CPM [ counts per
minute ] but DPM [ disintegrations per minute ].

That quantity is a property of the radioactive material - NOT the
method of detection - so all the issues you bring up above about the
isotropy of the source, and the transparencies to gamma rays are
irrelevant.

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
I see what you are saying, but I was under the impression that if you know the efficiency of the detector, you can relate CPM to DPM, and then convert to curies.

According to Radiation Detection and Instrumentation by Glenn Knoll (3rd ed) you can get the quanta emitted from the source if you know the intrinsic peak efficiency and the geometry of the setup.

[tex] s = n \frac{4 \pi}{\epsilon_{ip} \Omega}[/tex]
[tex] \Omega = 2 \pi (1 - \frac{d}{\sqrt{d^2+a^2}})[/tex]

n = number of events recorded
ε = intrinsic peak efficiency
s = number of radiation quanta emitted by source over measurement period
d = source-detector distance (cylindrical detector)
a = detector radius (cylindrical detector)

intrinsic efficiency being [pulses recorded]/[# radiation quanta incident on detector]
 
tehfrr said:
I see what you are saying, but I was under the impression that if you know the efficiency of the detector, you can relate CPM to DPM, and then convert to curies.

tehrr,

Yes - Curies is measure of the radioactivity of the material - and is
convertible to DPM.

CPM - i.e. what the detector measures can be used to infer the DPM.

But CPM and Curies are not convertible from one to the other.

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
I think tehfrr was trying to tell me that. Thank you for pointing that out tehrff.
 
Counts per unit time can be correlated/converted to disintegrations per unit time (or the actual activity) if one knows the integrated efficiency.

tehfrr provided an example of the spatial/geometric efficiency, but then there are factors like self-shielding within the specimen, scattering, detector dead time, and so on, to consider.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K