How Does Freezing Point Depression Affect Molecular Mass Calculations?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of freezing point depression on molecular mass calculations, particularly in the context of carboxylic acids. Participants explore the implications of undissolved sample material on calculated values and the accuracy of using freezing point depression as a method for determining molecular mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether undissolved sample material would lead to a higher or lower calculated molecular mass, suggesting that fewer dissolved particles would result in a higher freezing point and thus a higher molecular mass calculation.
  • Another participant asserts that determining the molecular mass of a weak acid using freezing point depression is extremely inaccurate and suggests calculating the expected freezing point depression using the actual molar mass.
  • There is a proposal that the observed doubling of the molecular mass could be due to the behavior of carboxylic acids, possibly involving dimerization, where two molecules act as one.
  • Some participants express confusion over the terminology related to freezing point depression, with one clarifying that less dissolved material leads to a smaller change in freezing point.
  • Concerns are raised about the imprecision of the freezing point depression method for calculating molecular mass, with references to typical deviations from expected values.
  • One participant mentions the concept of van't Hoff factor in relation to the observed phenomena.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the accuracy and reliability of using freezing point depression for molecular mass calculations. There is no consensus on the implications of undissolved material or the specific behavior of carboxylic acids in solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the method's accuracy and precision, highlighting the dependence on the solubility of the substances involved and the potential for significant deviations from theoretical values.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and researchers involved in chemistry, particularly those studying colligative properties, molecular mass determination, and the behavior of carboxylic acids in solution.

e-diot
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
if i have some of my unknown sample which remains unmelted and undissolved on the walls of the test tube, will this error cause the calculated molecular mass to be too high or too low?

i've thought about this and my guess is that the molecular mass would be too high because the colligative property depends on the concentration of the dissolved particles in the solution right. so less dissolved particles means that the freezing point will be higher. is that right? I'm so stressed :S

also when determining the molecular mass of carboxylic acid using this freezing point depression method the value found is approximately twice the theoretical value. i need to explain why this occurs

i was wondering, is it something to do with how well carboxylic acid dissolves in the solvent? and because (from my textbook) it says something about ionic compounds of oxoanions with high charges tend to be insoluble, carboxylic acid would then hardly dissolve in the solution, therefore freezing point temperature would be high causing the "determined" molecular mass to be twice the theoretical?

hrmm i hope i haven't confused anyone. please help me understand if you can
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
less dissolved particles will result in a lower freezing point depression.

It is extremely inaccurate to determine the molecular mass of a weak acid by freezing point depression. Why don't you try and calculate what the freezing point depression would have been with the substitution of the actual molar mass of the acid. Your value will be very, very, very low for the freezing point depression. It is most often the case that people will tend to overestimate the freezing point depression from the graphs data provided by such software as measurenet. Your experimental value is quite typical, it's a lesson you'll need to learn.
 
e-diot said:
if i have some of my unknown sample which remains unmelted and undissolved on the walls of the test tube, will this error cause the calculated molecular mass to be too high or too low?
If you do the calculation, it will tell you the answer.

also when determining the molecular mass of carboxylic acid using this freezing point depression method the value found is approximately twice the theoretical value. i need to explain why this occurs
Might it just be possible that the carboxylic acid itself behaves like it is made up of units where two molecules act as one ? There is a common name for this phenomenon; what is it ?
 
Most carboxylic acids are weak, so there should be not doubling in freezing point depression. Not to mention the fact that it is not stated that it is water freezing point depression...

Edit: is it molecular mass doubled, or freezing point depression doubled?

For me that's a clinical example of stupid question asked in the place where there are lots of good questions to ask.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gokul43201 said:
Might it just be possible that the carboxylic acid itself behaves like it is made up of units where two molecules act as one ? There is a common name for this phenomenon; what is it ?

this phenomenon is called super cooling? :confused: i not sure hehehe

P.S Borek, it is the "determined" molecular mass of the carboxylic acid that has doubled
 
GCT said:
less dissolved particles will result in a lower freezing point depression.

hrmm i think I'm getting bit confused with the terms lower freezing point depression and higher freezing point depression.
is lower freezing point depression a lower freezing point temperature? say freezing point of pure substance is 50 and so would a lower freezing point depression be something like 45?
and a higher freezing point depression be something like 48?
 
Forget about "lower", it is freezing point depression. Period.

It means that the liquid substance of known freezing point freezes at lower temperature, when there is something dissolved.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Borek said:
Forget about "lower", it is freezing point depression. Period.

It means that the liquid substance of known freezing point freezes at lower temperature, when there is something dissolved.

ah okay i think i get it now. so then the less dissolved, the freezing point will only drop a little. so because some of the unknown remains undissolved/unmelted on the walls of the test tube then my calculated molar mass would be too high?
 
Exactly. If not all is solved you are underestimating number of moles.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
his phenomenon is called super cooling? i not sure hehehe
no, although you'll probably witness supercooling when performing this experiment, it relates more to van't hoff factor, i.

hrmm i think I'm getting bit confused with the terms lower freezing point depression and higher freezing point depression.
is lower freezing point depression a lower freezing point temperature? say freezing point of pure substance is 50 and so would a lower freezing point depression be something like 45?
and a higher freezing point depression be something like 48?

lower freezing point depression relates to the freezing point of the mixed solution v.s. the pure solvent (in this instance, water). If more solutes are dissolved you'll witness a lower change in freezing point, freezing point of solution will be relatively lower than the pure solvent (colligative property).

again, your deviancy from the actual value is typical. The method is one of the most imprecise (as well as inaccurate) ways of calculating the molar mass. If you would have performed the calculation as I had asked in the my first post, you would have found that the theoretical freezing point depression is almost insignificant, very, very, very small. You would not have been able to witness this with the naked eye by simply observing a graph. Thus your overestimation is typical, it is actually a very good estimation in my opinion.
 
  • #11
Look for dimerization of carboxylic acids. That's what Gokul was referring to in his post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
10K