How Efficient Are Radio Signals Over Distance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thomas1980
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the efficiency of radio signals over distance, specifically examining the reception of a 1 Watt signal at a distance of 10 meters. Participants explore various factors affecting signal strength, including antenna design, polarization, and environmental influences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the expected signal strength at 10 meters from a 1 Watt transmitter, assuming optimal antenna and frequency adjustments.
  • Another participant notes that while atmospheric absorption is minimal, maintaining signal coherence is crucial, suggesting the use of parabolic antennas for this purpose.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of antenna dimensions, specifically mentioning that a 1/4 wavelength antenna is optimal for signal reception.
  • One contributor references the inverse square law (1/D^2) as a potential method to estimate signal strength over distance.
  • There is a discussion about the impact of antenna polarization on signal reception, particularly regarding dipole antennas oriented in different directions.
  • Participants debate the implications of using different types of antennas (e.g., horizontally polarized dipoles versus vertically polarized ones) and how this affects signal strength.
  • Another participant points out that the definition of "ordinary antennas" is crucial to understanding the question, as it influences the expected outcomes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of various antenna types and configurations, particularly regarding polarization and design. There is no consensus on the exact signal strength that would be received at the specified distance, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention several assumptions, such as optimal antenna design and environmental conditions, but do not fully resolve the implications of these factors on signal reception.

Thomas1980
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hey there

I've been wondering just how efficient radiosignals are... If I were to place a transmitter broadcasting 1 Watt then what would I be receiving at say 10 meters away? Of course the antennas and frequencies are adjusted to near optimal with regards to dimensions, size and frequency in both reception and transmition, so I need a best case guess... Any radioamateurs or other wise people around? :-D

Best regards

Thomas Hansen
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Not much gets absorbed by the atmosphere, but the problem is keeping the signal coherent. It is possible to keep some radio signals highly coherent by shaping the transmitter in a parabola.
 
With my limited knowledge on radiowaves and radiosignals I can only help a little bit: I know that it is important that the antenna is 1/4 of the wavelength of the signal you're sending/ receiving because you will then have the optimal dimensions of the antennas and therefore have the most powerful signal reception. My question is, just how much of a 1 Watt signal will you receive 10 metres away, if all of the equipment is properly adjusted? ( that's around 30 feet IIRC)
I need it to be with ordinary antennas, Parabolic is not and option.
The question is so simple, and the answer straightforward, it is probably even posible to calculate it... I just don't know how! :-(
Hope this narrows it down a little bit.

Best regards

Thomas Hansen
 
Some HAM operators sent a radio signal from the US to New Zealand,
Try 1/D^2
the inverse square law; for all your needs (if it fits of-cource)
Nice Coder
 
Try 1/D^2 the inverse square law; for all your needs (if it fits of-cource)

Indeed, but if he's using an "ordinary antenna" (dipole?) orented say north-south, there won't be much signal going in the north-south direction.
 
"Indeed, but if he's using an "ordinary antenna" (dipole?) orented say north-south, there won't be much signal going in the north-south direction." ??
you may mean that if he is using a vertically polerised dipole, that if the transmitting antenna was horizontally polerised that he wouldn't get much signal?
The minimum signal coming fro mthe transmitting antenna (at 90 degrees) is only -3DB, so its not that much (how many op-amps only have a 3db gain?)
:smile:
De Nice Codre
 
you may mean that if he is using a vertically polerised dipole, that if the transmitting antenna was horizontally polerised that he wouldn't get much signal?
I was thinking of a horizontal fullwave dipole. But the point was that his question depends on what "ordinary antennas" means.
 
on long wavelengths horizontal dipoles are predominantly used, for short wavelengths yagi's, and vertically polerised dipoles are used.

It does not matter what his definition of an 'ordinary antenna' is, as long as they are using the same antenna, with the same polerisation and are not using directional antenna's pointing away from each other!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K