Unearthing the Mysteries of the Michelson-Morley Experiment

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter James Jackson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Michelson-Morley experiment, its implications for the concept of ether, and the subsequent development of relativity. Participants explore various interpretations of the experiment's results, the nature of scientific conclusions, and the emergence of unconventional theories in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the Michelson-Morley experiment failed to detect an etheric medium, leading to the necessity for relativity, while others argue that the absence of a result does not invalidate the hypothesis of ether.
  • One participant suggests that the lack of an interference pattern constrains the characteristics of any potential ether, while another emphasizes that the absence of evidence does not equate to a definitive conclusion.
  • There are claims regarding a perceived conspiracy among mainstream physicists to suppress groundbreaking ideas, with some participants expressing skepticism about the motivations behind such suppression.
  • Humor and sarcasm are introduced in the discussion, with references to "evil energy companies" and comedic impersonations, indicating a lighter tone amidst the serious debate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; multiple competing views remain regarding the implications of the Michelson-Morley experiment and the nature of scientific discourse surrounding unconventional theories.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect personal opinions and interpretations rather than established scientific consensus, highlighting the subjective nature of the discussion. The interplay between humor and serious claims may also affect the clarity of participants' positions.

James Jackson
Messages
162
Reaction score
0
Wow, just reading through some of the stuff at crack.net, and came across this amazing insight:

Even earlier, the Michelson-Morley experiment created the need for relativity. It failed to find an etheric medium in space for conducting light waves. In fact, it failed to produce any result. A looked-for diffraction pattern did not appear. The absence of a result is not a valid basis for conclusions in science. Any number of explanations exist for the result.

I can begin to see how we get these people and their amazing crackpot theories appearing... You should see the copy I've got of a 'theory' that got sent to my department a few months ago. Perhaps I should scan it and put it up. Some choice quotes:

"Planck has to jurisdiction here", "In this model there is only one clock, no need for relativity", "The rest of physics ensues forthwith" etc. Amazing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
James Jackson said:
Even earlier, the Michelson-Morley experiment created the need for relativity. It failed to find an etheric medium in space for conducting light waves. In fact, it failed to produce any result. A looked-for diffraction pattern did not appear. The absence of a result is not a valid basis for conclusions in science. Any number of explanations exist for the result.
Well, not quite - the logic goes as follows:

Hypothesis: If there is an ether, this experiment will detect it via an interference pattern.
Experimental data: no interference pattern witnessed.
Conclusion: This experiment does not support the hypothesis that there is an ether and adds constraints to what an ether may "look like" if it does exist.

However, yes - relativity crackpottery is an interesting phenomena.
 
It's not crackpottery. There's a legitimate worldwide concerted effort on the part of mainstream physicists to keep their groundbreaking ideas from flourishing.
 
juvenal said:
It's not crackpottery. There's a legitimate worldwide concerted effort on the part of mainstream physicists to keep their groundbreaking ideas from flourishing.

And as with any quackery, simply by stating something without any valid evidence is considered to be sufficient enough.

Zz.
 
I forgot to mention the evil energy companies that are conspiring to keep perpetual motion machines off the market.
 
juvenal said:
I forgot to mention the evil energy companies that are conspiring to keep perpetual motion machines off the market.
My sarcasm detector appears to be malfunctioning - could you clarify and tell me if you're serious here?
 
russ_watters said:
My sarcasm detector appears to be malfunctioning - could you clarify and tell me if you're serious here?
It's the comedy stylings of juvenal and ZapperZ. I hear they're doing Vegas this summer.
 
I'm in dead earnest.:smile:

(Instead of being an Elvis, Barry White, or Elton John impersonator in Vegas, I could be a crank impersonator).
 
Last edited:
juvenal said:
I'm in dead earnest.:smile:

(Instead of being an Elvis, Barry White, or Elton John impersonator in Vegas, I could be a crank impersonator).
For tickets to the comedy stylings of juvenal and ZapperZ (Who perform onstage as Phizzy and Cranky) call your local Ticketmaster today!
 
  • #10
'This Physics is sound, I just need someone to write it in equations;
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K