Balancing a Cube on its Corner

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter amcavoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the problem of balancing a cube (or rectangular box) on its corner, focusing on the relationship between the angles and dimensions involved in achieving this balance. Participants explore the concepts of torque, center of mass, and vector relationships in a theoretical context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the torque must be equal for the vectors representing the base and height of the box, leading to a formula for the angle θ as θ = arctan(||w||/||v||).
  • Another participant challenges the initial premise by emphasizing that a cube has three dimensions and suggests that the diagonal from the pivoting corner to the opposite corner must be considered for balancing.
  • A different perspective is introduced, where the angle between the diagonal and the x-axis must be 90 degrees, leading to a relationship between the angles and the dimensions of the box.
  • One participant describes a method involving the angles φ and θ, asserting that the symmetry of the system implies a relationship between the dimensions that leads to the conclusion that arctan(||v||/||w||) = θ.
  • A later reply states that the answers provided by different participants are equal, suggesting a potential alignment in their reasoning despite differing approaches.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the approach to solving the problem, with no clear consensus on the correct method or final answer. Multiple competing models and interpretations of the geometry and physics involved remain present.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the uniformity of the box and the definitions of the vectors involved are not explicitly stated, which may affect the interpretations of the problem. The discussion also highlights the complexity of balancing a three-dimensional object on a corner, with various mathematical relationships proposed but not universally accepted.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying physics, engineering, or mathematics, particularly in areas related to mechanics, torque, and vector analysis.

amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
Say that you have a box with mass "M." The base is given by vector "v" and height by "w." If you want to balance it on the corner, what should the angle between "v" and the surface be (image attached)?

I tried to write this out, but not sure if I did it correctly.

I figured the torque must be the same (v and w).

[tex]F_{\mathbf{v}}||\mathbf{v}||=F_{\mathbf{w}}||\mathbf{w}||[/tex]

I figured out that the mass exerted on each is as follows:

[tex]M_{\mathbf{v}}=M\cos{(\theta)}[/tex]

[tex]M_{\mathbf{w}}=M\sin{(\theta)}[/tex]

Solving for [tex]\theta[/tex], I came up with:

[tex]\theta=\arctan{(\frac{||\mathbf{w}||}{||\mathbf{v}||})}[/tex]

Is this correct? Does my reasoning make any sense?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, first off, a cube has 3 dimensions, so if your talking about rectangles that's a different thing. Also, I'm guessing you mean a uniform rectangle. If so, then the diagonal of the rectangle from the pivoting corner to the opposite corner is given by the vector sum of v and w. From here, the torques on either side of this diagonal must be equivalent and in opposite directions. The only way the torques would balance is if the center of mass is above the pivot point. By symmetry, the center of mass will be at the center point of the rectangle, so the center of the rectangle must be directly above the pivot point.

By realizing the diagonal goes through the center, you can see that only when the diagonal is perpendicular to the x-axis will this occur, or

[tex](\vec{v} + \vec{w}) \cdot \hat{x} = 0[/tex]
 
I realize I didnt answer your question, to find the angle between v and the x axis, draw the vector sum triangle between v and w, name the resultant vector (which is the diagonal) Z.

The angle between Z and X must be 90 degrees, as we showed earlier, but the angle between Z and V is just the arctangent of W/V.

Angle ZX is 90 degrees, and is comprised by angles ZV + VX, where ZV = arctan W/V, so VX is just

[tex]VX = ZX - ZV = 90 - arctan\left(\frac{|W|}{|V|}\right)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
how i'd do it:

we know two things, we have two angles [tex]\phi[/tex] and [tex]\theta[/tex], [tex]\phi[/tex] being the (small) angle between x and w, and we know these two angles sum together to equal 90 degress. then because of the symmetry and that the center of gravity lies on the diag, we know that there's an equal amount of stuff in the x direction on each side of the diag... or that [tex]|v| cos\theta= |w| cos \phi[/tex] so, we substitute in [tex]cos\phi= sin\theta[/tex] and then solve to get [tex]\frac {|w|}{|v|} tan\theta = 1.[/tex] and then [tex]arctan(\frac{|v|}{|w|})=\theta[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Our answers are equal
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
18K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K