Why are dimension > 4 operators non-renormalizable?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fliptomato
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Operators
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Operators in quantum field theory with mass dimension greater than four are classified as "nonrenormalizable" due to the requirement that the Lagrangian density must remain dimensionless. In effective field theories, terms with dimensions exceeding four lead to coupling constants that possess negative dimensions, which results in divergences in the renormalization group flow. This phenomenon is elaborated in Chapter 12 of "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory" by Peskin and Schroeder, where the implications of such couplings are discussed in detail.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory principles
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian density concepts
  • Knowledge of renormalization group flow
  • Basic grasp of effective field theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Chapter 12 of "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory" by Peskin and Schroeder
  • Research the implications of negative dimension coupling constants
  • Explore the concept of effective field theories in greater depth
  • Learn about renormalization techniques in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, graduate students studying theoretical physics, and researchers interested in the implications of nonrenormalizable operators in high-energy physics.

fliptomato
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone--I'm curious why terms in the Lagrangian with mass dimension greater than four are "nonrenormalizable."

I understand that the action must be dimensionless, hence the Lagrangian [density] has mass dimension 4. However, in effective field theories, we can end up with terms of dimension > 4, hence the coupling must have negative dimension. What's so bad about this?

(I guess somehow the renormalization group flow for such coupling constants diverges a mass scale given by the coupling?)

Thanks,
Flip
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fliptomato said:
(I guess somehow the renormalization group flow for such coupling constants diverges a mass scale given by the coupling?)

It is exactly that ! It is explained for example in Ch 12 of Peskin and Schroeder, although quite sketchy.

cheers,
Patrick.
 
vanesch said:
It is exactly that ! It is explained for example in Ch 12 of Peskin and Schroeder, although quite sketchy.

cheers,
Patrick.

Peskin and Schroeder first talks about this in chapter 4 after introducing
the φ4, QED and Yukawa interaction terms, See bottom of page 79.

Then there's more in chapter 10.

PS: Thanks to Google-Print we may hope to link directly to the appropriate
book pages like in this example here:

http://print.google.com/print?id=ZbTXdWsrsAEC&lpg=237&dq=renormalizable+higher+order+interaction+term&prev=http://print.google.com/print%3Fie%3DUTF-8%26q%3Drenormalizable%2Bhigher%2Border%2Binteraction%2Bterm%26btnG%3DSearch&pg=237&sig=5Vrhek6UvWRHsdqimJlTP0ACCrY

Regards, Hans.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K