How do we find Integrating factor for a General Diff equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding an integrating factor for a general differential equation of the form pydx + qxdy + x^my^n(rydx + sxdy) = 0. Participants explore the existence of integrating factors, methods for finding them, and the conditions under which they can be determined.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that while every first-order differential equation has an integrating factor, there is no general method to find it.
  • Questions are raised regarding the nature of the constants p, q, r, and s in the equation, whether they are constants or functions.
  • One participant inquires about the complexity of the proof regarding the existence of integrating factors compared to general existence and uniqueness proofs for first-order ODEs.
  • Another participant suggests that if a solution exists in a neighborhood, it might imply the existence of an integrating factor, contingent on the boundedness of the right-hand side of the equation and its partial with respect to y.
  • There are suggestions to collect like terms and express the equation in terms of mdx + ndy, proposing an integrating factor of the form e^(integral of (1/n)(dm/dy - dn/dx), though this requires confirmation.
  • One participant emphasizes that the integrating factor must depend on both x and y, challenging the notion that a simpler form might suffice.
  • Another participant provides a detailed approach to finding an integrating factor, indicating that it can be expressed in a specific form involving powers of x and y, but notes a potential issue if sp = rq.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and methods for finding integrating factors, with no consensus reached on a general approach. Some agree that specific methods can be applied to particular equations, while others maintain that a general solution does not exist.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of p, q, r, and s, as well as the unresolved nature of the mathematical steps involved in determining integrating factors for the given equation.

himanshu121
Messages
649
Reaction score
1
For eg is there a way to find IF for
[tex]pydx +qxdy +x^my^n(rydx+sxdy)=0[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can be proved that every first order d.e. has an integrating factor but there is no general way to do it.
 
I have some questions:

(1) What are p,q,r, and s?

Constants or functions?

(2) The proof that you mention Hall, is it difficult to follow? For example, is it more involved then the general existence and uniqueness proofs for a first order ODE?

(3) If a solution can be shown to exist, then does this somehow guarantee the existence of some integrating factor? For example, the above equation can be written as:

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx}=-\frac{py+x^mry^{n+1}}{qx+sx^{m+1}ry^{n+1}}[/tex]


If the RHS of this equation and it's partial with respect to y are bounded in some neighborhood of the x-y plane, then a solution can be shown to exists in that neighborhood. Is that connected with showing an integrating factor exists as well?

(4) To Himanshu:

How close to the above equation can you get with another equation that looks like it and still be able to determine an integrating factor?
 
Last edited:
collect like terms and express the equation in terms of mdx+ndy,since you need integrating factors,it will be e^(integral of (1/n)(dm/dy -dn/dx).you still need to get this confirmed.and ask for more help from hall,saltydog,matt grime and especially hurkyl.they are the best
 
mathelord said:
collect like terms and express the equation in terms of mdx+ndy,since you need integrating factors,it will be e^(integral of (1/n)(dm/dy -dn/dx).you still need to get this confirmed.and ask for more help from hall,saltydog,matt grime and especially hurkyl.they are the best

Dude, you obviously must have just skipped your fingers randomly across the keyboard and they just happen to randomly spell "saltydog" cus' I'm not in the same category as those guys. But nice to be around them though. :smile:
 
himanshu121 said:
For eg is there a way to find IF for
[tex]pydx +qxdy +x^my^n(rydx+sxdy)=0[/tex]
I do not know exactly what you are asking. There is no way to find an integrating factor for a general differential equation. That is there is no general method to find the integrating factor of any differential equation. An integrating factor for your example differential equation can be found by a non-general method.
[tex]pydx +qxdy +x^my^n(rydx+sxdy)=0[/tex]
First we can observe this.
[tex]x^{1-p}y^{1-q}{d}(x^py^q)=pydx+qxdy[/tex]
Then we can write the equation as
[tex]xy(x^{-p}y^{-q}{d}(x^py^q)+x^my^nx^{-r}y^{-s}{d}(x^ry^s))=0[/tex]
so that is is easy to see that there will be an integrating factor of the form
[tex]\frac{(x^py^q)^a}{xy}[/tex]
to find a we note
[tex](x^py^q)^a=x^my^n(x^ry^s)^b[/tex]
so we solve
pa=m+rb
and
qa=n+sb
The equation times the integrating factor can then be easily integrated.
Note: There is a potential problem if sp=rq
 
Last edited:
mathelord said:
collect like terms and express the equation in terms of mdx+ndy,since you need integrating factors,it will be e^(integral of (1/n)(dm/dy -dn/dx).you still need to get this confirmed.and ask for more help from hall,saltydog,matt grime and especially hurkyl.they are the best
This will not work because and integrating factor that depends on x and y is needed. That ony works when there exist an integrating factor whose mixed second partial is 0. That if if there is an integrating factor of the form u(x) or u(y). Here we need an integrating factor of the form (x^py^q)^a.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K