Conceptual problem involving ME and intelligence

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter physics noob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual Intelligence
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the kinetic energy (KE) of three objects shot from a cliff at different angles, focusing on the relationship between their initial potential energy (PE) and final KE just before hitting the ground, while neglecting air resistance. The participants explore concepts of energy conservation and projectile motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how objects shot at different angles can have the same KE upon reaching the ground, questioning the role of initial height and potential energy.
  • Another participant asserts that all objects have equal final KE due to conservation of energy, given they start with the same initial speed and fall the same distance.
  • A different viewpoint notes that while the object shot at the highest angle has greater potential energy at the peak, its lower horizontal velocity compensates for this, resulting in equal KE at ground level.
  • Clarification is provided that all objects have the same KE when they reach the ground, as their potential energy becomes zero at that point.
  • A more detailed mathematical breakdown is presented, illustrating the relationship between initial velocity components and final velocity, concluding that KE remains constant for all objects under the given conditions.
  • One participant argues that the potential energy at the peak is irrelevant, reiterating that all objects start with the same energy and thus have the same KE upon impact.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that all objects will have the same KE upon reaching the ground, but there is some debate regarding the implications of initial potential energy and the effects of different launch angles on the motion of the objects.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the initial conditions, such as the same initial speed and neglecting air resistance, are critical to the discussion but are not explicitly stated by all participants. The mathematical derivations presented rely on specific conditions of projectile motion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and educators in physics, particularly those exploring concepts of energy conservation, projectile motion, and the effects of launch angles on motion dynamics.

physics noob
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
i lack the latter, so here is my question, if three objects are shot from a cliff all at different angles...what will their KE be right before they hit the ground relative to each other (neglecting air resistance) now i know the answer to this is they are all equal, having gotten it wrong on a test, but let's say the object shot at the highest angle, doesn't that one have the furest to fall meaning more PE due to gravity,,, how can they possibly all have the same KE,, ie speed. The lame answer i got from my professor was that they all started at the same height, but the object shot at the highest degree angle was at a different height, so it has more PE...confused and frustrated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The KE of all the objects are indeed equal, assuming that all the objects have the same initial speed.

Final KE = Initial KE + Initial PE.

This is just conservation of energy. If all objects fall the same distance and start with the same amount of kinetic energy, then conservation of energy demands that the objects' final KE be equal.

I hope that makes sense.

Claude.
 
The object shot at the highest angle has higher potential energy at the top of its flight path than the other two objects. However, the objects shot at lower angles are moving faster horizontally, which makes up for it. That's why they all have the same KE.
 
Just to be clear I should say they all have the same KE when they reach the ground and PE is equal zero.
 
Well, if i shoot them all at different angles, the steepest angle gets the most height, but also has the least horizontal component of velocity. When it hits the ground let's assume that the state of potential energy at this height is zero. Thus the kinetic energy is simply 1/2m*v DOT v. v DOT v is simply v^2 but is a scalar. v = sqrt(vx^2 + vy^2) so then vf^2 = vxf^2 + vyf^2 if we break it up into components and assume 2-D motion. vxf = v0cos(theta), vyf = v0sin(theta) - gt. Let's assume the ball lands on the height it was launched.
vf^2 = vo^2cos(theta)^2 + vo^2sin(theta)^2 -2*voy*g*t + (g*t)^2

but for parabolic motion w/ the same landing height we have
0 = voyt - gt^2/2 or that voy = gt/2 or (2*voy) = g*t
this means

vf^2 = vo^2cos(theta)^2 + vo^2sin(theta)^2 -2*voy*g*t + (g*t)^2
vf^2 = vo^2cos(theta)^2 + vo^2sin(theta)^2 -g*t*g*t + (g*t)^2
vf^2 = vo^2cos(theta)^2 + vo^2sin(theta)^2 -(g*t)^2 + (g*t)^2
vf^2 = vo^2cos(theta)^2 + vo^2sin(theta)^2
vf^2 = vo^2(cos(theta)^2 + sin(theta)^2)
vf^2 = vo^2

KEf = KE0 assuming mass is constant
 
But the potential energy at the top point is irrelevant to the problem. They all have the same kinetic and potential energy initially and so will have the same kinetic energy just as they hit the ground.
 
thanks to all for the quick and informative help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K