Tangent Plane Equation with Partial Derivatives

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter amcavoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Tangent
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the formulation of the tangent plane equation using partial derivatives. Participants explore the mathematical setup required to express the tangent plane in the form of z = f(x, y) and the challenges encountered in solving for z from the given equation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the tangent plane equation and attempts to express it using partial derivatives, leading to confusion when trying to isolate z.
  • Another participant questions the understanding of the problem, suggesting that the partial derivatives should be evaluated at a specific point, implying they act as constants.
  • A participant expresses frustration with arriving at a different solution than expected and seeks clarification on the correct approach.
  • There is a suggestion that the problem may involve different interpretations of the surface definition, which could lead to different forms of the tangent plane equation.
  • One participant provides an example to illustrate how to derive the tangent plane equation correctly, depending on the surface definition.
  • Another participant acknowledges the clarification provided and expresses gratitude for the assistance received.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to solving for z in the tangent plane equation. Multiple interpretations of the problem and the role of partial derivatives are discussed, indicating ongoing uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential misunderstandings regarding the evaluation of partial derivatives and the definitions of the surfaces involved, which may affect the formulation of the tangent plane equation.

amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
I know that a tangent plane is given by:

[tex]a(x-x_0)+b(y-y_0)+c(z-z_0)=0[/tex]

Where <a,b,c> is the gradient vector. When I was given the problem of writing an equation (z=...) for it, I replaced <a,b,c> with the partials that compose the gradient vector:

[tex]\left<a,b,c\right >=\left<\frac{\partial f}{\partial x},\frac{\partial f}{\partial y},\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}\right >[/tex]

Now I have:

[tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x-x_0)+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(y-y_0)+\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}(z-z_0)=0[/tex]

This is where I am having trouble solving for z because of the partial in front of it.

Any suggestions?

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i don't understand what's the problem here
:: Though partial is infront of z put it is operating on f only ::
 
I mean, when I try to solve for z, I come up with:

[tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}(z-z_0)=-\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x-x_0)-\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(y-y_0)[/tex]

From here, I want to solve for z, but when I do so I come up with something different than it should be.
 
its called "division".
 
mathwonk said:
its called "division".

Of course, I know that. I'm just saying that when I solve, I come up with something totally different than what it should be. I was basically wondering whether I set it up wrong, but I guess not.
 
? i think u don't want to solve PDE
 
I might be mistaken but with your formula, isn't it supposed to be the partial derivatives evaluated at the given point so its not just df/dx but (df/dx)(x,y,z). In that case the partial derivative part is just a constant. In any case I think its better to find the tangent plane from the gradient vector "dotted" with (X-x_0) where X = (x,y,z,) and x_0 is your given point.
 
alexmcavoy@gmail.com said:
Of course, I know that. I'm just saying that when I solve, I come up with something totally different than what it should be. I was basically wondering whether I set it up wrong, but I guess not.

Then you should tell us exactly what the problem says, what answer you got, and what you were told the correct answer should be.

Any time your answer does not match the answer given in the book, there are three possibilities:

1) Your answer might be wrong!

2) The books answer might be wrong! (Doesn't happen often but it happens)

3) You might have the same the same answer as the book but written in a different form.
(A friend and I once came up with "different" answers to a problem. It took us three days to show that they were, in fact, the same.)
 
Apparently, the answer is supposed to be:

[tex]z=f_x(x_0,y_0)(x-x_0)+f_y(x_0,y_0)(y-y_0)+f(x_0,y_0)[/tex]

When I try to solve my way, I come up with that PDE (I think) and I don't want to just multiply both sides by [tex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial f}[/tex], so I need to know how the real answer was arrived at.

Thanks again for all of your help.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
We have asked you repeatedly to state exactly what the problem is. In your first post you take the gradient of the function f(x,y,z) but in your last post you have f(x0,y0). How is the surface given? Is it f(x,y,z)= constant or z= f(x,y)?

If it is the latter, then the answer you give in your last post is correct and follows immediately from the formula you give in your first post by thinking of the surface as F(x,y,z)= f(x,y)-z which has gradient <fx,fy,-1>. The fz you are worrying about is just -1.
For example, if z= x2+ xy, to find the tangent plane at (1,1) let F(x,y,z)= x2+ xy- z so that the gradient is <2x+ y, x, -1> which is <3, 1, -1> at (1,1). z(1,1)= 2 so the tangent plane there is 3(x-1)+ 1(y-1)- 1(z- 2)= 0 or
z= 3(x-1)+ (y-1)+ 2.

If it is the former, then the answer in your last post is impossible. What you would do is use the formula in your first post evaluating the derivatives at the given point so they are just numbers.

For example, if f(x,y,z)= x2+ xy+ z2= 3, to find the tangent plane at (1, 1, 1), find the gradient of f= <2x+ y, x, 2z> and evaluate it at (1, 1, 1):
<3, 1, 2>. The equation of the tangent plane is 3(x-1)+ 1(y-1)+ 2(z-1)= 0.
 
  • #11
Alright that answered my question. Thank you.

I realize I didn't make my question very clear and I appologize about that. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K