Momentum head on collision problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a momentum problem involving a head-on collision between two trucks, A and B, with given initial momenta. The original poster presents their calculations and expresses confusion regarding the outcome after the collision, particularly the direction of the trucks' movement and the final momentum of truck B.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conservation of momentum and energy, questioning the assumptions made about the direction of movement after the collision. Some participants seek clarification on the original poster's calculations and request to see their work.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants have provided insights into the conservation principles involved, while others express uncertainty about the wording of the question and the implications of the given momenta.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the ambiguity in the question regarding the masses of the trucks and whether the collision is elastic. There is also a lack of clarity about the direction of momentum after the collision, which affects the interpretation of the results.

recon
Messages
399
Reaction score
1
Code:
A                B
-->           <--
24kgm/s      10kgm/s

Two trucks A and B are about to collide head on; their values of linear momentum are as shown in the figure above. After the collision the two trucks separate and move away from each other, at which time truck A has a linear momentum of 8.0 kgm/s.

My answer was 22 kgm/s because I assumed in my calculations that A and B will move in opposite directions after the collision, as this is what I infer from the statement 'after the collision the two trucks separate and move away from each other'.

However, this is wrong and the answer given in the book is 6 kgm/s.

I'm not sure what to make of this. :confused: Can someone please explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm guessing it's looking for truck B's momentum? Conserve energy and momentum is the trick here, there are no external forces. Also, post some of your work (equations).
 
Could you show your working please? I also got 6 kg m s^-1.
 
Oops, sorry! I forgot to include the question asked.

Calculate the momentum of truck B after collision and state its direction of travel.

I was thinking that

Total original momentum = Total current momentum
14 kgm/s = -8 kgm/s + Current momentum of B
Current momentum of B = 22 kgm/s

There is nothing said in the question about energy being conserved. It does not say anywhere that it is an elastic collision.
 
If you notice, the net momentum vector of the system (obtained by adding the initial momentum vectors of each component) is 14Ns to the right. Since momentum is conserved (no outside forces) this will not change. Taking the right to be positive, you have:

Total momentum = A + B = +14Ns
A Momentum = 8Ns
B's Momentum must be such that the total momentum is 14Ns to the right, so it must be 6Ns.
 
I really thought A would move to the left after collision. It's this part of the question 'After the collision the two trucks separate and move away from each other' that confuses me.
 
Well, as long as the "forward" truck has higher speed, they can move in the same direction and still separate.
 
Yes, I see that now. However, I still feel that the question lacks some information. We don't know the masses of A and B for one.

Is the question ambiguous?
 
recon said:
Yes, I see that too. However, I still feel that the question lacks some information. We don't know the masses of A and B for one.

You don't need them. The conservation of linear momentum is

[tex]p_{A1} + p_{B1} = p_{A2} + p_{B2}[/tex], where the letters and numbers specify the momenta of each particle before and after the collision (eg. [itex]p_{A1}[/itex] is the momentum of A before the collision, etc).
 
  • #10
I just found out from the internet that 'head-on' collisions are in fact elastic collisions. We weren't taught this at school.

Right now, I would like to apply the principle of conservation of energy to the problem but I can't seem to find a starting point.
 
  • #11
Recon, you are right. Out of the two choices for the final momentum of A, it does look like you made the right choice. That last sentence must be interpreted in the original rest frame, and so I too would have made the same choice.

PS : "Head on" collisions do not have to be elastic, and even if this one was, there's not enough data to apply CoE.

This is just an ambiguously worded question and the solution has probably assumed p_A (final) = 8 kgm/s with the positive x-axis pointing to the right. (This wasn't drawn in the picture, was it ?)
 
Last edited:
  • #12
recon said:
I really thought A would move to the left after collision. It's this part of the question 'After the collision the two trucks separate and move away from each other' that confuses me.

Gokul43201 said:
This is just an ambiguously worded question and the solution has probably assumed p_A (final) = 8 kgm/s with the positive x-axis pointing to the right. (This wasn't drawn in the picture, was it ?)

I agree. The question seems ambiguous to me also. You cannot know before solving the problem which way truck A is moving after the collision unless you assume the 8kgm/s is to be taken as positive, continuing in the original direction. I thought perhaps you could eliminate one possibility based on energy (assuming no explosion to increase the energy of the system), but in fact you cannot.

You can show (below) that either solution demands the trucks be of equal mass. If energy were conserved, both trucks would recoil with an exchange of velocity. Since the -8 and +22 solution has the trucks recoiling with less than inital velocities, no kinetic energy is created, but not much is lost. The +8 and +6 solution corresponds to a much higher, and no doubt more realistic energy loss. However, without specifying energy loss or final direction, both solutions are valid

[tex]m_A v_{Ai} + m_B v_{Bi} = m_A v_{Af} + m_B v_{Bf}[/tex]

[tex]m_A \left( {v_{Ai} - v_{Af} } \right) = m_B \left( {v_{Bf} - v_{Bi} } \right)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{{m_A }}{{m_B }} = \frac{{\left( {v_{Bf} - v_{Bi} } \right)}}{{\left( {v_{Ai} - v_{Af} } \right)}}[/tex]

[tex]m_A v_{Ai} + m_B v_{Bi} = 24Ns - 10Ns = 14Ns[/tex]

[tex]K.E._i = \frac{{\left( {24Ns} \right)^2 }}{{2m_A }} + \frac{{\left( {10Ns} \right)^2 }}{{2m_B }}[/tex]

Case 1: Mass A moves to the left

[tex]m_A v_{Af} + m_B v_{Bf} = - 8Ns + 22Ns = 14Ns[/tex]

[tex]\frac{{m_A }}{{m_B }} = \frac{{\left( {v_{Bf} - v_{Bi} } \right)}}{{\left( {v_{Ai} - v_{Af} } \right)}} = \frac{{22Ns - \left( { - 10Ns} \right)}}{{24Ns - \left( { - 8Ns} \right)}} = \frac{{32}}{{32}} = 1 \Rightarrow m_A = m_B = m[/tex]

[tex]\Delta K.E. = \frac{{\left( {8Ns} \right)^2 + \left( {22Ns} \right)^2 }}{{2m}} - \frac{{\left( {24Ns} \right)^2 + \left( {10Ns} \right)^2 }}{{2m}} = \frac{{\left( {548 - 676} \right)N^2 s^2 }}{{2m}} = - \frac{{64N^2 s^2 }}{m}[/tex]

Case 2: Mass A moves to the right

[tex]m_A v_{Af} + m_B v_{Bf} = 8Ns + 6Ns = 14Ns[/tex]

[tex]\frac{{m_A }}{{m_B }} = \frac{{\left( {v_{Bf} - v_{Bi} } \right)}}{{\left( {v_{Ai} - v_{Af} } \right)}} = \frac{{6Ns - \left( { - 10Ns} \right)}}{{24Ns - \left( {8Ns} \right)}} = \frac{{16}}{{16}} = 1 \Rightarrow m_A = m_B = m[/tex]

[tex]\Delta K.E. = \frac{{\left( {8Ns} \right)^2 + \left( {6Ns} \right)^2 }}{{2m}} - \frac{{\left( {24Ns} \right)^2 + \left( {10Ns} \right)^2 }}{{2m}} = \frac{{\left( {100 - 676} \right)N^2 s^2 }}{{2m}} = - \frac{{288N^2 s^2 }}{m}[/tex]

Case 2 does seem more representative of an actual collision, but not the only possible answer.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Gokul43201 said:
(This wasn't drawn in the picture, was it ?)

Nope.

*looks at olderdan's post*

I wish it had, though. :biggrin:

But, seriously, I'm going to look through that in the morning (Brunei time). Need to catch some sleep now. Thanks for all the help guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
18K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K