Beta or positron induced reactions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for beta or positron-induced nuclear reactions, exploring the feasibility of capturing electrons or positrons in certain isotopes and the implications for energy release. Participants examine the mechanisms involved, including the role of neutrinos and gamma rays, and consider the possibility of chain reactions and energy gains compared to fission and fusion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that certain isotopes like 64Zn and 58Ni could capture electrons and release positrons, potentially leading to energy gains, although they note the challenges posed by neutrino radiation.
  • Others argue that positrons are more likely to annihilate with electrons rather than participate in nuclear reactions, questioning the feasibility of a chain reaction.
  • There are suggestions that gamma rays resulting from electron-positron reactions could excite nuclear states or lead to secondary effects, but doubts remain about their ability to induce significant nuclear reactions.
  • Some participants discuss the likelihood of Compton scattering and the photoelectric effect as the primary interactions of gamma rays with matter, rather than nuclear reactions.
  • One participant expresses curiosity about the potential surprises from the electroweak force and how it might affect nuclear reactions, particularly in heavier nuclei.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some agreeing on the challenges of achieving nuclear reactions through the proposed mechanisms, while others remain skeptical about the feasibility of chain reactions and the role of gamma rays. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the viability of the proposed reactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the energy barriers for double beta decay and the role of neutrinos, as well as the dependence on specific isotopes and their properties. There are unresolved questions regarding the effectiveness of proposed mechanisms and the conditions under which they might operate.

arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,498
Reaction score
203
Looking at the table of isotopic masses table it seems that certain atoms, as 64Zn or 58Ni, could be able to capture an electron and then release a positron with an energy higher, in average, that the initial electron.

On the other side, some nucleus are able to capture a positron and release an electron, for instance 124Sn or 116Cd. Of course, these are just the atoms which can undergo double-beta, but here we have an energy input from the initial particle so the decay rate will be higher.

We could do a pile of both kinds of material and then try a chain reaction.

The energy gain in this kind of reactions is about 1MeV / atom, thus two orders of magnitude lower than fission, and one order lower than fusion, but still orders higher than chemical sources of energy. True, there are dissipative mechanisms against this, the most relevant being neutrino radiation, for which I do not know on any efective trick to recapture :-(

In any case, I wonder if someone has anytime read about this mechanism, even if only to dismiss it. Any pointer there? It seems worth to look a little about how to overcome the dissipation problems.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not familiar with the details of the process you are describing. However, whenever positrons are involved, they would be much more likely to collide with electrons resulting in mutual anihilation than in any nuclear reaction. As a result I can't see any chain reaction occurring.
 
well. that gamma could be absorbed again, causing an atom to decay, or be used to get energy. Or perhaps some "electron free" paths could be created by solid state effects. Also, a fast electron could be induced to emit a pair, so it could compensate the loss. This is a thing you can not do with neutrons, to create a pair at these energies.

The real problems are neutrinos. They are not going to escape because its low low cross section, carriying energy away. I can not see if there is any solution to it.
 
Gamma rays from electron-positron reaction are 511 kev. They can't cause any nuclear reaction. All they can do is excite electrons.
 
Ah,no, excitation energies for atomic electron are of the electronvolt order, even if a deep electron is involved, it should be only some tens of electronvolts. 0.511 MeV is already the order of excitation of protons and neutrons in the nucleus. The usual thing for this ray should be to excite some levels *in the nucleus* then getting a secondary cascade of Xrays.
 
The two principal reactions of gamma rays with atoms at these energies are Compton scattering (gamma ray loses energy by transfering some of it to an electron) and photoelectric effect (gamma ray is completely absorbed by electron being knocked out of the atom). Nuclear reactions would be extremely rare (if at all).
 
The most I look, the most I tend to agree. The barrier to do a double beta (alt a double capture) is usually about hundreds of KeV only, but it is difficult to jump it. As you say, compton scattering is the most likely effect, jointly with complete electron ejection (energy is too hard for just an atomic excitation, that is eV only) and perhaps some nuclear excitation when/if frequencies match.

I wonder if we could expect surprises from the electroweak force. The carriers W,Z have a (virtual) mass around 90 atomic mass units. Thus momenta transfer mechanisms could be different depending of the mass of the nucleus and its internal state. Current research have not found discrepances, but it is done mainly in the low atomic mass range.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K