
#1
Jun2505, 06:52 PM

HW Helper
P: 4,125

An antisymmetric tensor of rank two [tex]E_{ij}[/tex] has [tex]E_{ij}=E_{ji}[/tex] for all i and j right? Meaning for i=j, [tex]E_{ij}=0 [/tex]... Just wanted to make sure of this.
Here's what I'm trying to prove. Given [tex]E_{ij}[/tex] is an antisymmetric tensor. Is [tex]E_{ij,k}[/tex] a tensor? I get yes. Here's my proof: [tex]E_{i'j',k'} =\sum_i \sum_j \sum_k (\frac{\partial}{x^k}(E_{ij}\frac{\partial x^i}{\partial x^{i'}}\frac{\partial x^j}{\partial x^{j'}}))\frac{\partial x^k}{\partial x^{k'}}[/tex] This reduces to: [tex]\sum_i \sum_j \sum_k E_{ij,k}\frac{\partial x^i}{\partial x^{i'}}\frac{\partial x^j}{\partial x^{j'}}\frac{\partial x^k}{\partial x^{k'}} + \sum_i \sum_j \sum_k E_{ij}(\frac{\partial}{x^k}(\frac{\partial x^i}{\partial x^{i'}}\frac{\partial x^j}{\partial x^{j'}}))\frac{\partial x^k}{\partial x^{k'}}[/tex] Finally after rewriting the second part: [tex]\sum_i \sum_j \sum_k E_{ij,k}\frac{\partial x^i}{\partial x^{i'}}\frac{\partial x^j}{\partial x^{j'}}\frac{\partial x^k}{\partial x^{k'}} + \sum_i \sum_j \sum_k E_{ij}(\frac{{\partial}^2 x^i}{\partial x^k \partial x^{i'}}\frac{\partial x^j}{\partial x^{j'}} + \frac{\partial x^i}{\partial x^{i'}}\frac{{\partial}^2 x^j}{\partial x^k \partial x^{j'}})\frac{\partial x^k}{\partial x^{k'}}[/tex] The expression [tex]E_{ij}[/tex] is multiplied by in the second triple summation is symmetric about i and j... so if I write one element of the second summation as: [tex]E_{ij}X_{ijk}[/tex]... so we add two elements of this sum [tex]i_1[/tex] and [tex]j_1[/tex] are not equal: [tex]E_{i_1 j_1}X_{i_1 j_1 k_1} + E_{j_1 i_1}X_{j_1 i_1 k_1} = E_{i_1 j_1}X_{i_1 j_1 k_1}  E_{i_1 j_1}X_{i_1 j_1 k_1} =0[/tex] since E is antisymmetric, and X is symmetric about i and j... So in this manner each element with indices [tex]i_1,j_1,k_1[/tex] where the i and j elements are different, cancels with the element with indices [tex]j_1,i_1,k_1[/tex]. And when [tex]i_1 = j_1[/tex] we have [tex]E_{i_1,j_1} =0 [/tex] so that element in the summation is 0 anyway. So the second summation goes to zero. And we have: [tex]E_{i'j',k'} = \sum_i \sum_j \sum_k E_{ij,k}\frac{\partial x^i}{\partial x^{i'}}\frac{\partial x^j}{\partial x^{j'}}\frac{\partial x^k}{\partial x^{k'}}[/tex] so [tex]E_{ij,k}[/tex] is a tensor? Does this look right? Thanks a bunch. 



#2
Jun2505, 07:21 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 11,863

Of course it's incorrect.
This part [tex] \frac{\partial^{2}x^{i}}{\partial x^{k'}\partial x^{i'}}\frac{\partial x^{j}}{\partial x^{j'}}+\frac{\partial x^{i}}{\partial x^{i'}}\frac{\partial^{2}x^{j}}{\partial x^{k'}\partial x^{j'}} [/tex] is obviously nonsymmetric in "i" and "j" and nonantisymmetric in <<j'>> and <<k'>>. Daniel. 



#3
Jun2605, 09:13 AM

P: 701

what could you do to make it a tensor?
Hint: [tex]A_{i,j}[/tex] is not a tensor but [tex]A_{i,j}  A_{j,i}[/tex] is a tensor 



#4
Jun2605, 09:26 PM

HW Helper
P: 4,125

Can you check my proof? 



#5
Jun2605, 09:45 PM

HW Helper
P: 4,125

I just proved that [tex]E_{ij,k} + E_{jk,i} + E_{ki,j}[/tex] is a tensor where [tex]E_{ij}[/tex] is antisymmetric. Is that what you were referring to? 



#6
Jun2705, 01:40 AM

P: 701




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
check my alternate proof, please  Calculus & Beyond Homework  3  
Can you check my proof, (binomial theorem appplied)  Calculus & Beyond Homework  1  
Proof Check! (irrational number)  Calculus & Beyond Homework  4  
Predicate calculus: Proof problem (please check for me)  Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics  10  
analysis / compactness proof check  Calculus  6 