Is x Irrational When x^x Equals 2?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Icebreaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether the value of x in the equation x^x = 2 can be rational. Participants explore the implications of rational roots and provide arguments related to the irrationality of certain roots of 2.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that to show 2 has no rational roots, one can assume it does and derive a contradiction through the properties of integers.
  • Others argue that extending the proof for the square root of 2 to other roots of 2, such as 2^{1/n} for n > 1, leads to complications, particularly when n is odd.
  • A participant suggests that if x^x = 2, then x must be irrational because x can be expressed as 2^{1/x}, and since 2 has been shown to have no rational roots, this implies x cannot be rational.
  • Another participant discusses the implications of assuming x = p/q, where p and q are coprime integers, leading to contradictions when analyzing the equation (p/q)(p/q) = 2.
  • Some participants note that if p/q is not a whole number, then (p/q)^n is not whole for natural n, which creates further contradictions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that x cannot be rational if x^x = 2, but the reasoning and implications of the proofs presented are contested and not fully resolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the nature of rational and irrational numbers, and the proofs rely on properties of integers that may not be universally accepted without further clarification.

Icebreaker
How do I show that 2 has no rational roots?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First assume it does. Write square root of 2 = p / q, where p and q are integers. Then p^2 = 2 q^2, and so must be even... you can guess the rest. Eventually you come to a conclusion that contradicts one of your original assumptions.
 
Write square root of 2 = p / q, where p and q are integers.

Where p and q are coprime integers...
 
Note: you will need the fact that the square of an odd number is always odd:
(2n+1)2= 4n2+ 4n+ 1= 2(2n2+ 2n) + 1.
 
No, I meant ANY rational root. That is,

[tex]2^{\frac{1}{n}}[/tex] is not rational for any positive integer n > 1.

I tried "extending" the square root of 2 proof, however, at some point,

[tex]2a^n=b^n[/tex]

If n is even, then it works. But if n is odd, then the argument breaks down.

Or does it, let me think...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the same proof applies. Suppose (p/q)n = 2 where gcd(p,q) = 1. Then

pn = 2qn

This tells us that pn is even, which tells us that p is even, which tells us that 2n|pn. This in turn tells us that qn is even, which in turn tells us that q is even. Both q and p are even, and thus aren't co-prime, contradicting our assumption that they were.
 
Yup, that's what I thought too. Thanks everyone.

On a side note, [tex]x^x = 2[/tex] implies that x cannot be rational because [tex]x = 2^{1/x}[/tex] and 2 has 2 rational roots, as we've shown. Is that correct?
 
Icebreaker said:
Yup, that's what I thought too. Thanks everyone.

On a side note, [tex]x^x = 2[/tex] implies that x cannot be rational because [tex]x = 2^{1/x}[/tex] and 2 has 2 rational roots, as we've shown. Is that correct?
Our assumption before was that 21/n where n was an integer greater than 1. However I don't think it is hard to extend if you let x = p/q.
 
Icebreaker said:
Yup, that's what I thought too. Thanks everyone.

On a side note, [tex]x^x = 2[/tex] implies that x cannot be rational because [tex]x = 2^{1/x}[/tex] and 2 has 2 rational roots, as we've shown. Is that correct?
If x is rational, then there are coprime p and q such that x = p/q. We get:

(p/q)(p/q) = 2

(p/q)p = 2q

If p/q is not a whole number, then in general (p/q)n is not whole for natural n, and in particular when n = p. On the other hand, 2q is of course whole, so we have a contradiction unless p/q is a whole number. But it's easy to check 11 is not 2, 22 is not 2, etc. So we get a contradiction regardless, so x is irrational.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K