<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no,location=no, scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>René Meyer mentioned\n\n> http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/309/5731/78b\n\nNice, but doesn\'t the second to last question rather miss the point?\n\n(Of course all the zeros are -complex numbers-. I guess the editors took\ntheir own advice: "Don\'t sweat the details"!)\n\n"T. Essel"\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form"> View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>René Meyer mentioned
> http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/309/5731/78b
Nice, but doesn't the second to last question rather miss the point?
(Of course all the zeros are -complex numbers-. I guess the editors took
their own advice: "Don't sweat the details"!)
"T. Essel"
Similar Threads for: No new Riemann
Physorg.com Science News Partner
