Nuclear Engineers - Stuck Working in Desolate Areas?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the career prospects and geographical locations associated with nuclear engineering jobs. Participants express concerns about the tendency for these positions to be located in rural or remote areas, contrasting this with a desire to live in urban centers that offer cultural and social opportunities. The conversation explores potential job opportunities beyond traditional roles in government labs and utilities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses passion for nuclear engineering but worries about being confined to rural areas after graduation, citing examples like Idaho National Labs and Los Alamos.
  • Another participant mentions their experience in the Navy, suggesting that naval positions may offer more urban living opportunities due to port visits.
  • Some participants propose that while many generating stations are remote, corporate offices for utilities are often located in metropolitan areas, providing potential urban living options.
  • Several participants list specific nuclear facilities near urban centers, such as Argonne in Chicago and Brookhaven on Long Island, as alternatives to more isolated locations.
  • One participant suggests that there may be more opportunities in the utility sector, which could offer positions in larger cities.
  • Another participant highlights that Los Alamos is not far from Santa Fe and Albuquerque, which could be livable options despite not being major cities.
  • Some participants discuss the appeal of Idaho Falls for outdoor activities, suggesting that geographical location may have its own benefits despite remoteness.
  • Concerns about allergies affecting job opportunities in the Navy are mentioned, with a humorous note about the lack of pollen at sea.
  • One participant expresses interest in an internship at INL but is apprehensive about the location, indicating a desire for more information about the work environment there.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that many nuclear engineering jobs are located in rural areas, but there is no consensus on whether this is a significant drawback. Multiple competing views exist regarding the availability of urban job opportunities and the desirability of rural living.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention specific job postings and locations, but there are limitations in the discussion regarding the full scope of opportunities available to nuclear engineers and the impact of geographical preferences on career choices.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and professionals in nuclear engineering, those considering a career in the field, and individuals interested in the geographical aspects of engineering jobs may find this discussion relevant.

tehfrr
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hello

I’m currently working on a nuclear engineering major with a minor in business administration. I absolutely love what I am learning about. There is nothing more I'd rather be doing; I’ve been passionate about nuclear energy from a young age. That being said, I’m a little stressed about where I am going to end up once I’m done with grad school.

All the places I’ve looked at that hire nuclear engineers tend to be somewhat in the middle of nowhere. I’m thinking places like Idaho national labs, Los Alamos, Y12, Pantex, Hanford or pretty much any utility. The labs and power generation stations alike all seem to be away from large urban centers.

Something that is important to me is living in a large urban center. I love the culture and variety of experiences a big city has to offer. Considering this, I’m starting to worry that I am going to be stuck living in some rural area due to my career choice. I know some of those places have small cities nearby – for example I’ve been to TriCities/Hanford already, but that is still not very acceptable to me.

Is this something where I am just going to have to suck it up and live somewhere that makes me unhappy? Or perhaps is there something I am missing here? Also, I am approaching this with the mindset that nuclear engineers work for either DOE labs, the navy, or power utilities. Are there other good jobs for nuclear engineers that I am missing here?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
eh, I'm in the navy, so my nuke work will be on a carrier. at least there are ports every couple of weeks.
 
Yeah, navy could be exciting but they probably wouldn't touch me as I get seasonal allergies/asthma from pollens sometimes during the first few weeks of spring
 
tehfrr said:
Hello

I’m currently working on a nuclear engineering major with a minor in business administration. I absolutely love what I am learning about. There is nothing more I'd rather be doing; I’ve been passionate about nuclear energy from a young age. That being said, I’m a little stressed about where I am going to end up once I’m done with grad school.

All the places I’ve looked at that hire nuclear engineers tend to be somewhat in the middle of nowhere. I’m thinking places like Idaho national labs, Los Alamos, Y12, Pantex, Hanford or pretty much any utility. The labs and power generation stations alike all seem to be away from large urban centers.

Something that is important to me is living in a large urban center. I love the culture and variety of experiences a big city has to offer. Considering this, I’m starting to worry that I am going to be stuck living in some rural area due to my career choice. I know some of those places have small cities nearby – for example I’ve been to TriCities/Hanford already, but that is still not very acceptable to me.

Is this something where I am just going to have to suck it up and live somewhere that makes me unhappy? Or perhaps is there something I am missing here? Also, I am approaching this with the mindset that nuclear engineers work for either DOE labs, the navy, or power utilities. Are there other good jobs for nuclear engineers that I am missing here?

Are there many opportunities for you to live in Manhattan, no, but it's not quite as bleak as you think.

A map of north american plants can be found here:

http://www.insc.anl.gov/pwrmaps/map/north_america.php

Some plants/facilities near (within 30-60 miles) major cites:
Argonne - Chicago
GE/Brunswick - Wilmington
Westinghouse - Pittsburgh
Dresden/Braidwood - Chicago
Perry- Cleveland
Indian Point - New York
Pilgrim - Boston
Turkey Point - Miami
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tehfrr said:
Yeah, navy could be exciting but they probably wouldn't touch me as I get seasonal allergies/asthma from pollens sometimes during the first few weeks of spring
Well out at see, there is little in the way of pollen. :biggrin:

jdsneeder gave some possibilities.

While the generating stations are mostly out in the middle of nowhere, many main offices are in metropolitan areas. Exelon (Chicago suburbs), Entergy (Jackson, MS), Duke Power (Charlotte) are in major cities or suburbs.

The manufacturers are GE/GNF (Wilmington, NC), Westinghouse/BNFL (Columbia, SC), and Framatome (Lynchburg, VA and Richland, WA (Richland/Pasco/Kennewick).

Then there are the NRC (Washington DC) or National Labs - Los Alamos (Los Alamos, near Santa Fe, NM) or Oak Ridge National Labs (ORNL - near Knoxville).
 
tehfrr said:
Hello

I’m currently working on a nuclear engineering major with a minor in business administration. I absolutely love what I am learning about. There is nothing more I'd rather be doing; I’ve been passionate about nuclear energy from a young age. That being said, I’m a little stressed about where I am going to end up once I’m done with grad school.

All the places I’ve looked at that hire nuclear engineers tend to be somewhat in the middle of nowhere. I’m thinking places like Idaho national labs, Los Alamos, Y12, Pantex, Hanford or pretty much any utility. The labs and power generation stations alike all seem to be away from large urban centers.

How about:

Argonne - suburban Chicago
Bettis Atomic Power Lab- Pittsburgh
Brookhaven - Long Island - suburban New York
DOE HQ - Washington D.C.
FermiLab - suburban Chicago
Nuclear Regulartory Com. - Washington D.C
Knolls Atomic Power Labs - Schenecdady, NY
Lawrence Berkeley - suburban San Francisco
Lawrence Livermore - suburban San Francisco
Stanford Linear Accelerator - suburban San Francisco

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
Excellent, thank you all for your replies. I really appreciate it. Looks like I was looking in all the wrong places for sure :smile:
 
tehfrr said:
Excellent, thank you all for your replies. I really appreciate it. Looks like I was looking in all the wrong places for sure :smile:

Take a look at monster.com and type in "nuclear engineer" or nrc.gov or doe.gov and take a look through the postings.

Note that many of the .gov jobs other than the NRC require advanced degrees.

It's also my gut feeling that there are many more opportunities in the utility side.

Good luck.
 
Los Alamos isn't so far from Sante Fe and Albequerque, which while not world class metropolises are not bad places to live. And, if you end up working on say, waste disposal, Yucca Mountain isn't far from Vegas. Both are also largely allergen free.

Now, Idaho, well, every field has posting that should command extra pay and that is one of them.
 
  • #10
Actually, INL has some cool stuff going on.

I was talking with a guy there about their hotcells. It seems they will be ramping up there for some PIE.

http://www.inl.gov/

And the Advanced Reactor program.

http://nuclear.inl.gov/gen4/

If you like the outdoors - Idaho Falls is a great location.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Astronuc said:
Actually, INL has some cool stuff going on.

I was talking with a guy there about their hotcells. It seems they will be ramping up there for some PIE.

http://www.inl.gov/

And the Advanced Reactor program.

http://nuclear.inl.gov/gen4/

If you like the outdoors - Idaho Falls is a great location.

Astronuc,

Yes - a friend of mine lives in Idaho Falls; he used to work at
Argonne-West, and now heads up an office that supplies the analysis
codes for reactor reload calculations.

He likes to ski in the winter, and climb mountains in the summer.

Idaho Falls is just a hop, skip, and a jump from Jackson Hole, Wyoming;
which has the Grand Targhee ski area, as well as the Teton Mountains.

It's a bit remote - but it's a "playground" for the super-rich.

http://www.grandtarghee.com/

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
  • #12
I’m working towards getting an internship at INL next summer (or with Exelon). I'm very interested in some of the things going on up there, but the geographical location was the big thing putting me off. That's not at all how I envisioned it. Perhaps Idaho Falls could be fun, thanks for the different perspective on that.
 
  • #13
That could be interesting; however, I wonder if that place will actually open because of all the bureaucracy associated with it...

ohwilleke said:
And, if you end up working on say, waste disposal, Yucca Mountain isn't far from Vegas.
 
  • #14
tehfrr said:
Hello

I’m currently working on a nuclear engineering major with a minor in business administration. I absolutely love what I am learning about. There is nothing more I'd rather be doing; I’ve been passionate about nuclear energy from a young age. That being said, I’m a little stressed about where I am going to end up once I’m done with grad school.

All the places I’ve looked at that hire nuclear engineers tend to be somewhat in the middle of nowhere. I’m thinking places like Idaho national labs, Los Alamos, Y12, Pantex, Hanford or pretty much any utility. The labs and power generation stations alike all seem to be away from large urban centers.

Something that is important to me is living in a large urban center. I love the culture and variety of experiences a big city has to offer. Considering this, I’m starting to worry that I am going to be stuck living in some rural area due to my career choice. I know some of those places have small cities nearby – for example I’ve been to TriCities/Hanford already, but that is still not very acceptable to me.

Is this something where I am just going to have to suck it up and live somewhere that makes me unhappy? Or perhaps is there something I am missing here? Also, I am approaching this with the mindset that nuclear engineers work for either DOE labs, the navy, or power utilities. Are there other good jobs for nuclear engineers that I am missing here?

This is just a general guideline, but if you're dead set on doing research work or being a code peon for an industry giant, then by all means go to grad school (but drop the BA minor, it won't do anything for you). If you want to work at utilities or be a civilian contractor to the Navy, just get your BS and do a co-op or internship along the way. Go to Navy OCS if you hate yourself.

Yes, a vast majority of the power plants are not real close to large cities. If you live in a decent sized city, you can expect at least a 30 min drive to work, but don't be surprised as that gets near an hour.

Labs are another thing. Yes there are labs associated with various large cities, but that requires the Ph.D (9 times out of 10) and not every lab may be doing something you want to do or would be needed for.

When it comes down to it, nuclear power and big cities aren't generally mixed.

I'm the reactor engineer at Summer station outside of Columbia, SC, if you're curious. I came from Indianapolis originally and have found great frustration trying to match my own desire to live in a city versus plant locations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K