Ferrite beads block cell phone radiation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the effectiveness of ferrite beads in reducing radiation from hands-free mobile phone kits. Participants explore the mechanisms of radiation transmission, the potential health implications of mobile phone use, and the practicality of implementing ferrite beads in mobile technology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Professor Lawrie Challis claims that ferrite beads can reduce radiation from hands-free mobile phones to virtually zero by blocking unintentional emissions traveling up the wire.
  • Dr. Stuart Porter supports Challis's view, explaining that ferrite beads block unintentional currents, which can be likened to a blockage in a water pipe.
  • Michael Milligan argues that mobile phones are tested for safety and have been deemed compliant with standards, suggesting that the focus should be on these established safety measures rather than on ferrite beads.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the safety of using mobile phones close to the head, suggesting that using ferrite beads or keeping the phone at a distance might be safer alternatives.
  • There is a discussion about the mechanism of radiation transmission through headphone jacks, with one participant explaining that headphones can act as antennas, directing radio waves to the head.
  • Several participants question the validity of claims regarding the dangers of mobile phone radiation, asking for evidence to support assertions that using a phone close to the head is unsafe.
  • Some participants mention that the placement of ferrite beads is crucial for their effectiveness, with suggestions to position them around the antenna or below the microphone on the hands-free kit.
  • There is a debate about the nature of radiation, with some participants distinguishing between electromagnetic radiation and ionizing radiation, arguing that not all radiation poses a health risk.
  • One participant mentions that as hands-free technology shifts to Bluetooth, the relevance of ferrite beads may diminish.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the effectiveness and necessity of ferrite beads. While some support their use for reducing radiation exposure, others emphasize existing safety standards and question the need for additional measures. The discussion remains unresolved on the overall safety implications of mobile phone use and the role of ferrite beads.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions about radiation transmission, the effectiveness of ferrite beads, and the safety of mobile phone use. There are unresolved questions about the optimal placement of beads and the mechanisms by which radiation is transmitted through hands-free devices.

Excelsior814
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Bead 'slashes mobile radiation'

Radiation from hands-free mobile phones can be reduced to virtually zero by a simple tiny magnetic bead which costs a few pence, a government adviser says.

Professor Lawrie Challis said clipping a ferrite bead on kits stops the radio waves traveling up the wire and into the head.

He called on the mobile phone industry to start using them "as standard".

The beads, which often measure less than 1cm in diameter, are commonly used to stop data interference in computers.

Professor Challis, who is chairman of the Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research Programme, told BBC News: "There is no evidence yet that mobile phones are harmful to health but people have not been using them long enough for us to be sure.

I agree they can have an impact. But the bigger issue is that mobile phones are tested to be comply with standards and have been passed safe
Michael Milligan, from the Mobile Manufacturers Forum

"Using a ferrite bead effectively reduces emissions to the head to zero but as yet manufacturers do not put them on hands-free kits."

And Professor Challis, who was also on the Stewart committee which looked into mobile phone safety in 2000, added: "I am not sure why, but I wish they would. They could use it as a marketing technique, you would think they would like to promote it."

While studies have shown hands-free kits reduce radiation, emissions still travel up the wires on the outside and are absorbed by the head.

The beads work by absorbing these "unintentional" emissions.

Wires

Dr Stuart Porter, of the department of electronics at the University of York, said he agreed with Professor Challis's comments.

Dr Porter, who has looked at the use of ferrite beads, said: "Hands-free kits effectively have two currents, an intentional one that stays within the wires and an unintentional one on the outside.

"It is the unintentional one the beads stop. They work by blocking the current, a bit like a block in a water pipe."

He said evidence suggested beads worked best when they were placed below the microphone on the hands-free kit, at about chest level.

But Michael Milligan, general secretary of the Mobile Manufacturers Forum, rejected Professor Challis's call for them to be used on hands-free kits.

"I agree they can have an impact. But the bigger issue is that mobile phones are tested to be comply with standards and have been passed safe."

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/4203077.stm

So how effective are these beads? Which dimensions would be optimal for radiation blockage?

I'm understanding that the article assumes that radiation from the cellphone itself would appear to be reduced because the user has a headset and so the phone would be distant from the body. So the ferrite bead is just blocking any residual radiation that might be traveling up the headset wire?

Thanks for your clarifications! :smile:
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
How does this work?

My understanding of cell phone radiation is that it is transmitted from the antenna, and that a hands free set would not rebroadcast that radiation. Does anyone know what the exact mechanism for hands-free transmission of radiation is?
 
The headphone jack being connected to the phone's circuitry cand and does transmit radiation. If your are familiar with some phones that have FM tuners built in you will note that they require you to plug in the headphone for the radio to work. This is because the headphones or earphones act like an antenna to capture radio waves and direct them to phone.

In the reverse manner when the phone is emitting radio waves (be it for FM radio or to communicate to the cell tower to make or receive calls) if the head phone jack is plugged in, the radio waves will travel up the head phone jack. this is not by design but non the less, this adverse affect causes the headphones to become a bidirectional antenna directing radio waves strait to the head.

It is also not safe to put the cell phone to your head when using it. using a ferrite bead or sometimes called ferrite choke on the headphone, placed as close to the cell phone as possible is the best alternative to not using a cell phone that I have found thus far.
 
May be, we sometimes exaggerate some topics too much.

And take no notice of things like this.

But the thing is, if any type of radiations penetrate through your body, then I wonder what exactly happens in our body during this process. There must be some kind of danger.

I once read somewhere that if we use too much of cell phones, then our feet must have a direct contact with the Earth during its use !

Any idea how come ? !

 
panthro said:
It is also not safe to put the cell phone to your head when using it. using a ferrite bead or sometimes called ferrite choke on the headphone, placed as close to the cell phone as possible is the best alternative to not using a cell phone that I have found thus far.

But I thought that was what has been tested so far and there's no connection to any cancers or diseases? That's why it has been approved as safe. Claiming that it is "not safe" really does require some research and proof on your part. Do you have any links to studies concerning modern cell phones where it has been shown to be unsafe? If not, how then do you come to that conclusion?
 
It is also not safe to put the cell phone to your head when using it.
If the 'researcher' believes that then they must believe there is some distance at which it is safe.
So having decided with no evidence that a phone next to your ear is dangerous, they have decided that one in your pocket is safe

Otherwise i can come along and with the same lack of evidence say that he shouldn't use a hands free set, because the phone is still within 1m of you, you should use a Bluetooth headset and keep the phone 10m away. Although I suppose you could claim that the radiation from the Bluetooth as harmful.
 
For maximum effect the bead should be placed around the antenna at its base.
 
Ali Inam said:
I once read somewhere that if we use too much of cell phones, then our feet must have a direct contact with the Earth during its use !

Any idea how come ? !

That's false. At the wavelengths used by cell phones, their antennas work fine stand-alone.
 
eegreg said:
My understanding of cell phone radiation is that it is transmitted from the antenna, and that a hands free set would not rebroadcast that radiation. Does anyone know what the exact mechanism for hands-free transmission of radiation is?

Do you understand the general principles of how a cell phone works in the first place? A cell phone uses a radio to communicate with a tower; a handsfree set (bluetooth) is ANOTHER radio that communicates with the cell phone (using a radio at a different frequency with much lower power).

Ali Inam said:
But the thing is, if any type of radiations penetrate through your body, then I wonder what exactly happens in our body during this process. There must be some kind of danger.

Do you understand the difference between electromagnetic radiation like radio waves and ionizing radiation like X-rays and gamma-rays? I'll give you a hint- one can give you cancer, and the other has no measurable effect on you at all (that has yet been proven anyway).

A sweeping generalization like "radiation is dangerous" is meaningless, and driven by undereducation in the subject.

Ali Inam said:
I once read somewhere that if we use too much of cell phones, then our feet must have a direct contact with the Earth during its use !

Let's just say that's excellent proof that you can't believe everything you read. Especially on the internet.
 
  • #10
Beads increase the impedance of the wire that threads through them at RF frequencies. Nowdays handsfree is going Bluetooth so this is becoming irrelevant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K