How Can a 3D PDE Be Simplified to a 1D Equation in Theta?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ido
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    1d 3d Pde
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on simplifying a three-dimensional partial differential equation (PDE) represented as Laplacian[F] + a*d(F)/d(teta) = E*F into a one-dimensional equation in the teta direction. By applying constraints such as z=0 and r=a, the Laplacian in cylindrical coordinates can be reduced, eliminating the derivatives with respect to r and z. This results in the simplified 1D PDE: (1/a)*d/dteta(a*dF/dteta) + a*E*F = 0, which can be solved using standard methods for 1D PDEs. The solution is valid only under the specified constraints of the problem on a simple ring.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinates
  • Knowledge of the Laplacian operator in different coordinate systems
  • Basic skills in solving 1D PDEs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Laplacian operator in cylindrical coordinates
  • Learn methods for solving one-dimensional partial differential equations
  • Explore the implications of boundary conditions in PDE simplifications
  • Investigate the physical interpretations of PDEs in cylindrical geometries
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with partial differential equations, particularly those interested in cylindrical coordinate systems and simplification techniques for PDEs.

Ido
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I got the following PDE:
Laplasian[F]+a*d(F)/d(teta)=E*F

I worked with cylindrical coordinates (r,teta,z)
(teta is the angle between the x-axis and the r vector (in xy plane))
a,E are constants

I got the constrains: z=0 r=a , so the whole problem is on a simple ring

How can I make the 3D PDE just 1D in teta?
Can I use the Laplasian in cylindrical coordinates, and throw away the d/dr and d/dz?

I hope someone can help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without separation of variables (which I know you don't want to do), I don't see a way.
 


The given PDE can be simplified to a 1D PDE in the teta direction by making use of the constraints given. Since the whole problem is on a simple ring, we can assume that the function F is only dependent on the teta coordinate. Therefore, the Laplacian operator in cylindrical coordinates can be simplified to just the second derivative with respect to teta, i.e. Laplacian[F] = (1/r)*d/dr(r*dF/dteta).

Furthermore, since the constraints state that z=0 and r=a, any terms containing the z or r coordinates can be eliminated. This leaves us with the simplified 1D PDE:

(1/a)*d/dteta(a*dF/dteta) + a*E*F = 0

This can be solved using standard methods for solving 1D PDEs. It is important to note that the solution obtained will only be valid for the specific constraints given, i.e. for the problem on a simple ring. If the constraints were to change, the PDE would need to be re-evaluated accordingly.

In summary, to make the 3D PDE just 1D in teta, we can use the Laplacian in cylindrical coordinates and eliminate any terms containing the z or r coordinates based on the given constraints. This will result in a simplified 1D PDE that can be solved using appropriate methods.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K