Prove Diagonals of Parallelograms Bisect w/ Vector Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter kanki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other using vector methods. The original poster presents a scenario involving a parallelogram ABCD with diagonals intersecting at point O.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various vector representations of the diagonals and their relationships. Some suggest using vector equations to express the segments and their midpoints, while others question the assumptions regarding the magnitudes of the segments.

Discussion Status

There are multiple approaches being discussed, with some participants providing vector equations and reasoning to support their claims. Questions about the assumptions related to the magnitudes of the segments indicate ongoing exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of assuming that the segments of the diagonals are parallel but not necessarily equal in magnitude. This leads to further questioning of the relationships between the vectors involved.

kanki
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I'm stucked here...
How to prove that the diagonals of parallelogram bisect each other using vector method?
Let's say for ABCD which is parallelogram, AB//DC, AD//BC, O is the point of intersection of the diagonals.
Can i straight away apply that [itex]\overrightarrow{AO}=\frac{1}{2}\overrightarrow{AB}+\frac{1}{2}\overrightarrow{BC}[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Say you have a parallelogram ABCD, AB // CD, and AD // BC. O is the intersection of AC and BD.
You have:
[itex]\vec{OA} = \vec{OB} + \vec{BA} = \vec{OD} + \vec{DA}[/itex]
[itex]\vec{OC} = \vec{OB} + \vec{BC} = \vec{OD} + \vec{DC}[/itex]
[itex]\vec{OA} + \vec{OC} = 2\vec{OB} + \vec{BA} + \vec{BC}[/itex]
[itex]= 2\vec{OB} + \vec{BD}[/itex]
[itex]\vec{OA} + \vec{OC}[/itex] will give you a vector which is on AC.
[itex]2\vec{OB} + \vec{BD}[/itex] will give you a vector which is on BD.
The only vector that's both on AC and BD is [itex]\vec{0}[/itex].
So [itex]\vec{OA} + \vec{OC} = \vec{0} \Leftrightarrow[/itex] O is the midpoint of AC.
From there, you can easily prove O is the midpoint of DB.
Hope someone will come up with another shorter proof.
To use: [itex]\vec{AO} = \frac{1}{2}(\vec{AB} + \vec{BC})[/itex], just state that O is the midpoint of AC, and [itex]\vec{AC} = \vec{AB} + \vec{BC} \Leftrightarrow \frac{1}{2} \vec{AC} = \frac{1}{2} (\vec{AB} + \vec{BC}) \Leftrightarrow \vec{AO} = \frac{1}{2}(\vec{AB} + \vec{BC})[/itex]
Viet Dao,
 
Last edited:
Probably, a little shorter than VietDao has, but similar.
[tex]\vec{AO}+\vec{OB}=\vec{AB}[/tex]
[tex]\vec{AO}+\vec{OD}=\vec{AD}[/tex]
[tex]2\vec{AO}+\vec{OB}+\vec{OD}=\vec{AC}[/tex]
[tex]\vec{OB}+\vec{OD}=\vec{AC}-2\vec{AO}[/tex]
Thus [tex]\vec{OB}+\vec{OD}=\vec{0}[/tex] (for the reason, which explaned VietDao)
For me it also doesn't looks as simpliest way.
 
But, aren't we have to assume that magnitude of OB and OD is not the same? And so AO is not half of AC.
So how to prove that OB + OD = AC - 2AO = 0?
 
OB and OD are on the same line (they are parallel) (i believe it's given in definition of diagonal).
 
kanki said:
But, aren't we have to assume that magnitude of OB and OD is not the same? And so AO is not half of AC.
So how to prove that OB + OD = AC - 2AO = 0?
Assume only that the two segments of each diagonal are parallel, not equal

[tex]\vec{AC} = \vec{AB} + \vec{BC} = \vec{AO} + \vec{OC} = (1 + \alpha)\vec{AO}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{BD} = \vec{BC} + \vec{CD} = \vec{BC} - \vec{AB} = \vec{BO} + \vec{OD} = (1 + \beta)\vec{OD}[/tex]

Add the above

[tex]2\vec{BC} = 2\vec{AD} = (1 + \alpha)\vec{AO} + (1 + \beta)\vec{OD} = \vec{AO} + \vec{OD} + \alpha\vec{AO} + \beta\vec{OD} = \vec{AD} + \alpha\vec{AO} + \beta\vec{OD}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{AD} = \alpha\vec{AO} + \beta\vec{OD} = \alpha(\vec{AD} - \vec{OD}) + \beta\vec{OD} = \alpha\vec{AD} + (\beta - \alpha)\vec{OD}[/tex]

Since [tex]\vec{AD}[/tex] and [tex]\vec{OD}[/tex] are not parallel, the only possible combination of coefficients on the right hand side is [tex]\alpha = \beta = 1[/tex]

[tex]\vec{OC} = \alpha\vec{AO} = \vec{AO}[/tex]

[tex]\vec{BO} = \beta\vec{OD} = \vec{OD}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K