Suppose you are navigating in Egypt deserts by trusting the compass

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter salsero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compass
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of using a compass for navigation in the Egyptian deserts, particularly focusing on the concept of magnetic declination and its effects on directional accuracy. Participants explore various factors influencing compass readings, including geographic and magnetic north, and share experiences from different locations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the accuracy of a compass can vary significantly depending on the location due to the "anagonic angle," which is the difference between magnetic and celestial north.
  • One participant mentions that in the UK, the anagonic angle is about 5 degrees, suggesting that this level of declination can be surprising for those who trust their compass.
  • Another participant shares that in Sedona, Arizona, the magnetic declination can exceed 10 degrees due to local geological features, rendering compasses unreliable.
  • There is a discussion about the terminology used to describe the difference between geographic and magnetic north, with some referring to it as "magnetic declination" and others as "variation." This leads to a clarification of related terms such as deviation and compass error.
  • Participants express curiosity about the physical reasons behind daily changes in magnetic readings, particularly in areas with significant magnetic anomalies.
  • One participant highlights the challenges faced by pilots and sailors in navigating due to the need to account for multiple factors affecting compass readings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the existence of magnetic declination and its implications for navigation, but there are multiple competing views regarding the terminology and the extent of declination in different regions. The discussion remains unresolved on the specifics of how these factors interact in various locations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of specific data on the exact declination values in Egypt and the potential variability in magnetic readings due to local geological conditions. The discussion also touches on the complexity of navigation that involves multiple corrections and adjustments.

salsero
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Suppose you are navigating in Egypt deserts by trusting the compass to determine the South direction. If your destination is 15 km to the North of you, approximately by how much will you miss it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I geuss it depends on what part of the Egyptian desert you walk through. The thing that's going to take you off-course is called the "anagonic angle"; the difference between magnetic North and celestial North. Here where I live, the North Pole described by the Earth's axis of rotation and the Magnetic North Pole are very close together. If I take the ferry across Lake Michigan to go to Minisota, I will cross the line along which the two are perfectly lined up (the Agonic Line). So magnetic deviance in Michigan is almost zero (we preferr to be deviant in other ways ).

Now I just heard a few days ago that the anagonic angle in the UK is about 5o. That is, the magnetic pole is 5o West of the rotational pole. If you look at a globe, you can get a pretty good guestimate of the anagonic angle for Egypt.

Inetresting note:
The Agonic line runs through both the Bermuda Triangle and its far eastern twin, the Dragon's Triangle. It also runs through the less well-known, but somewhat more dangerous "Great Lakes Triangle", right near the Western shore of Michigan (the place where I take a lot of my vacations) .
 
Most people, including pilots, just refer to the difference between geographic and magnetic north as "magnetic declination."

- Warren
 
Thank you very much!

I just wanted the order of magnitude such declination can be. If you say 5 degrees in UK, it is of the same order of magnitude as I got. I was surprised that it was so large. Before, I thought that I can really trust the compass. I knew that the magnetic and the real poles do not coincide, but I didn't know that the effect is so big.
 
Here in Arizona, USA, there is a place called Sedona. The rocks there are so laden with iron that it causes huge bends in the magnetic field. I can't remember exactly how much the magnetic north is but I believe it is more than 10 degrees. It also changes from day to day. Compasses there are perfectly useless. The magnetic phenomenon that occurs there as attracted a cult following. Many of the people that live there think it is caused by UFOs and such.
 
Is there a physical explanation for the daily changes there in Arizona?

Has anyone seen UFOs there?
 
Everybody there claims to have seen UFOs, some claim to have been abducted, and others claim to be aliens from another dimension-- but none of them, I think, can be considered the brightest bulb in the string.

The Earth's magnetic field is constantly in flux due to motion of magma under the crust. To get an accurate reading of north from a compass you have to look up correction figures in an almanac.
 
Originally posted by salsero
I was surprised that it was so large.
Think about people who live on the line between the geographic and magnetic north poles -- for them, geographic north and magnetic north are directly opposite!

- Warren
 
5deg is actually pretty small, where I live in the Pacific Northwest it is about 20deg.
 
  • #10
Originally posted by chroot
Most people, including pilots, just refer to the difference between geographic and magnetic north as "magnetic declination."

- Warren
Actually, in the Navy (on nautical charts) it is referred to as "variation."

Figuring out what direction you are going on a ship can be a laborious exercise. Lots of things to consider/relate to each other:
True north
Magnetic north
(magnetic) Compass error
Gyro (compass) error
variation
deviation

Variation is the difference between magnetic and true north. Deviation is the difference between your actual magnetic heading and what your magnetic compass reads (since you are on a hunk of metal, you need to adjust for this). Compass error is the total difference between your magnetic compass and true heading. Gyro error is the difference between your ship's gyrocompass (which reads in degrees true) and actual true north.
 
  • #11
Originally posted by russ_watters
Actually, in the Navy (on nautical charts) it is referred to as "variation."

Figuring out what direction you are going on a ship can be a laborious exercise.
Many of the same things apply to flight, as well. I have to deal with quite a lot of that (gyro drift, declination, etc.) for every flight. Not to mention the wind...
Lots of things to consider/relate to each other:
True north
Magnetic north
(magnetic) Compass error
Gyro (compass) error
variation
deviation
What's the difference between variation and deviation? In some lattitudes you also have to deal with "dip," which is the result of the fact that the field lines are not parallel to the Earth's surface -- they become vertical at the poles.

- Warre
 
  • #12
Originally posted by chroot
Most people, including pilots, just refer to the difference between geographic and magnetic north as "magnetic declination."

- Warren

Now that's interesting, since the place where I first learned the term "anagonic angle" was from my flight instructor! I waonder if that's a regional thing here in Mi? Doesn't seem likely; terminology among pilots is not very location-specific because universal standards of comunication are so important to safety in air travel.
 
  • #13
Originally posted by LURCH
Now that's interesting, since the place where I first learned the term "anagonic angle" was from my flight instructor! I waonder if that's a regional thing here in Mi? Doesn't seem likely; terminology among pilots is not very location-specific because universal standards of comunication are so important to safety in air travel.
I'll look in my ground school book when I get home to check, but I'm pretty sure it uses the term "declination." I used the King Schools CD-ROM-based ground school program.

- Warren
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K