Pressure change inside a tank(s)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Pressure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around pressure changes in tanks connected by a valve, specifically examining the final pressure after equalization between a full tank and an empty tank. Participants also explore the concept of pressure regulation devices for maintaining specific pressure levels in tanks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if two identical tanks are connected, one empty and one at 200 psi, the final pressure will be 100 psi if the volume of the valve is neglected.
  • Another participant agrees, attributing the result to Boyle's Law, stating that doubling the volume halves the pressure.
  • A later reply introduces the condition that the process must be isothermal for the pressure to remain at 100 psi, noting potential complications if the gas is stored at a higher temperature than the empty tank.
  • Participants discuss the existence of pressure regulation devices, with one mentioning digital pressure measurement and electronic control of valves.
  • One participant expresses concern about safety when using liquid nitrogen (LN2) in a cannon, emphasizing the need for proper pressure relief mechanisms.
  • Another participant describes a simple pressure relief mechanism using a check valve that opens at a specified pressure, while cautioning about the importance of proper sizing.
  • There is a suggestion to consider using compressed air instead of LN2 for simplicity, but another participant humorously defends the complexity of using LN2 for increased firing capability.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the application of Boyle's Law to the pressure equalization scenario, but there are differing views on the conditions required for the pressure to be 100 psi and the safety implications of using LN2. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to pressure regulation and the feasibility of using LN2.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions, such as neglecting the volume of the valve and the necessity of isothermal conditions, which may affect the conclusions drawn. The discussion also highlights the complexity of pressure vessel safety and the need for appropriate mechanisms to manage pressure.

Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
Ok i was wondering something, let's say you have tank A and tank B that are identical. Tank A is pretty much empty and tank B is full of some gas at 200psi. Let's say you hook them up with a valve but the valve is closed. After the valve opens up and they are allowed to equalize, what will the pressure be overall?

Gut instinct says 100psi... but i don't know :)

Also, does anyone know if something exists that regulates pressure. Say you have a tank at 40psi and don't want ti to go any higher, is there something you could attach that opens up and releases the gas until it comes back down to 40psi in the event it goes beyond that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you neglect that volume of the valve it should be 100psi.
 
The total pressure will be 100 psi if you neglect the volume of the valve and the gas is ideal. This is a result of Boyle's Law: PV=Constant. Double the volume[itex]\rightarrow[/tex]halve the pressure.<br /> <br /> As for your second question, there exist devices that give digital measurements of pressure and there are devices that can control a valve electronically, so I've got to imagine there is a device like the one you describe.[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Ah yes, gut instinct was correct again!

How bout that pressure regulator i was talken about? I was tinkering with the (probably non-feasible) idea of using LN as a propellant in a cannon but obviously, putting LN into a sealed tank without a safety mechanism is just asking for losing a limb or two.
 
sweeeeeeeeet, thanks :D
 
Pengwuino said:
sweeeeeeeeet, thanks :D
A MULTITUDE of choices!
 
I just realized something else to keep in mind for the pressure to be 100 psi: the process must be isothermal. This is not that big a deal because a perfect gas expanding into a vacuum does no work, and the the internal energy of a perfect gas is a function only of temperature, so in order for energy to be conserved, the temperature will remain constant even if the process is adiabatic. This could pose a problem, however, if you have the gas stored at a very high temperature, much higher than that of the empty tank. This would cause a temperature drop, which would lower the pressure,
 
Pengwuino said:
How bout that pressure regulator i was talken about? I was tinkering with the (probably non-feasible) idea of using LN as a propellant in a cannon but obviously, putting LN into a sealed tank without a safety mechanism is just asking for losing a limb or two.
Yes it would be since LN2 will flash off in a heart beat if it's not properly insulated and your pressure will skyrocket in an instant. BTW...not all pressure relief valves are created equal. If you do venture into this you had better make darned sure that the relief is sized properly or it won't do you any good.

A relief can be as simple as a check valve that has a high cracking pressure that is equal to the desired pressure you want in the tank. Once that pressure is reached, the check valve unseats and will start to bleed off the excess pressure. Of course there are some drawbacks, but it is easy.

Also at this pressure, technically you are dealing with pressure vessels.

Any particular reason why you would want to complicate things with using LN2? Why not simply compressed air?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
haha, simply to complicate it :)

I was just thinken if you used liquid nitrogen, you could fire off more rounds (obviously we're insane people going for the gatling gun/cannon type of thing :P) because the tanks in a sense, constantly re-pressurizing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K