Register to reply

Calculate the Electric Potential

by discoverer02
Tags: electric, potential
Share this thread:
Nov4-03, 02:57 PM
P: 142
What am I doing wrong here?

Here's the problem:
For the arrangement descripbed in the previous problem (see attachment), calculate the electric potential at point B that lies on the perpendicular bisector of the rod a distance b above the x axis.

[lamb] = [alpha] x where [alpha] is a constant.

The correct answer is
V = -(k[alpha]L/2)ln(([squ] [(L^2/4) + b^2)] - L/2)/[squ] [(L^2/4) + b^2)] - L/2))

I'm not getting the same answer.

So far I've got the following: [the] = [<]'a' on the diagram.

V = kq/r
x' = btan[the]
dx' = bsec^2[the]d[the]
x = L/2 + x'
r = bsec[the]

dq = [lamb]d(L/2 + x') = [lamb]dx'
dq = [alpha](L/2 + x')dx' = [alpha](L/2 + btan[the])bsec^2[the]d[the]

so dV = k[alpha](L/2 + btan[the])bsec^2[the]d[the]/bsec[the]

Taking the integral of both sides from -[the] to +[the] doesn't yield the correct result.

I'd appreciate it if someone could point out where I went wrong. I have a feeling the problem's in [lamb] = dq/dL = dq(L/2 + x').

Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Experts defend operational earthquake forecasting, counter critiques
EU urged to convert TV frequencies to mobile broadband
Sierra Nevada freshwater runoff could drop 26 percent by 2100
Nov4-03, 03:06 PM
P: 142
I forgot the attachment. Here it is.
Attached Images
File Type: bmp diagram.bmp (23.7 KB, 41 views)
Nov4-03, 03:52 PM
P: 513
How is that rod charged?

You say
dq = &lambda; dx' with
&lambda; = &alpha; x.

This would mean that the rod is NOT uniformly charged. Are you sure this is what the problem says?

Normally, problems like this have a uniformly charged rod, meaning
sth. like dq = &lambda; dx', where &lambda; is a constant.

Nov4-03, 05:45 PM
P: 142
Calculate the Electric Potential

The rod is not uniformly charged. [lamb] varies with x.
Nov5-03, 02:25 AM
P: 1,046
Small typo in the answer. Should be:

-(k&alpha;L/2)ln{( sqrt[(L2/4) + b2)] + L/2)/ (sqrt[(L2/4) + b2] - L/2)}
(the answer you posted equals 0)

Don't set it up in terms of the angle.
You want V = -k&int;dq/r
dq = &Lambda;dx and &Lambda; = &alpha;x
dq = &alpha;xdx
r = sqrt(b2 + (x - L/2)2)

so your integral is

V = -k&alpha;&int; (xdx/(sqrt(b2 + (x - L/2)2)) from x=0 to x=L

It actually does work out. Happy integrating.
Nov5-03, 09:19 AM
P: 142
Thanks again gnome.
Nov5-03, 11:42 AM
P: 142
That integral is a royal pain!!!

I'm curious. What was wrong with the integral I was originally working with other than the fact that it might be easier integrating with respect to 'x' rather than the angle?
Nov5-03, 04:04 PM
P: 1,046
Actually, nothing. Shoulda done it your way.

dV = k&alpha;(L/2 + btan&theta;)bsec^2&theta;d&theta;/bsec&theta;
dV = k&alpha;(L/2 + btan&theta;)sec&theta;d&theta;
V = k&alpha;L/2 &int;sec&theta;d&theta; + k&alpha;b &int;tan&theta;sec&theta;d&theta;
V = k&alpha;L/2 {ln|sec&theta; + tan&theta;|}{from -&theta; to &theta;} + k&alpha;b{sec&theta;}{from -&theta; to &theta;}
The way you have defined theta, up at the top there, sec(-&theta;) = sec(&theta;) = (sqrt[L2 + 4b2])/(2b) so the second term of the integral drops out completely.

tan&theta; = L/(2b)
tan(-&theta;) = -L/(2b)

so the integral, evaluated from -&theta; to &theta;, becomes:
(k&alpha;L/2)(ln{(sqrt[L2 + 4b2])/(2b) + L/(2b)} - ln{(sqrt[L2 + 4b2])/(2b) - L/(2b)})

Play around with that a little & you get exactly the same answer.
Nov5-03, 06:33 PM
P: 142

It's a relief to know I set the integral up correctly. A stupid mistake on my part evaluating the integral turned into something it's not, so I thought I was going about it the wrong way.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Electric Potential Energy and Electric Potential Difference Introductory Physics Homework 2
Gauss' law to calculate electric potential Classical Physics 1
Electric potential and electric potential energy question... Introductory Physics Homework 1
Why can't i calculate this system of electric potential? Introductory Physics Homework 0
Electric Potential/Electric Potential Energy question... Introductory Physics Homework 3