Convergence of Improper Integral

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing the convergence of the improper integral \(\int_0^1 \frac{x^2+1}{\sqrt{x}(1-x)^{5/4}} \, dx\). Participants explore the behavior of the integrand near the endpoints of the interval, particularly as \(x\) approaches 0 and 1.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to analyze the integral by splitting it into two parts and comparing it to simpler integrals to assess convergence. Some participants question the validity of the exponent manipulation in the integrand and suggest examining the behavior of the integrand near the endpoints more closely.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the behavior of the integrand near the limits of integration. There are differing interpretations of how to justify the convergence or divergence of the integral, with some suggesting the use of inequalities and substitutions to clarify the analysis.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the appropriate justification for replacing the integrand with simpler forms and the conditions under which these replacements hold. Participants express uncertainty about how to effectively communicate these ideas in an exam setting.

pbialos
I have to analize the convergence of the following integral:

[tex]\int_0^1 \frac {x^2+1} {\sqrt x * (1-x)^{5/4}}[/tex]

I tried to divide it between 0-1/2 and 1/2-1 and on the first one i reached to:
[tex]\int_0^{1/2} \frac {x^2+1} {\sqrt x * (1-x)^{5/4}}<=\int_0^{1/2} \frac {x^2+1} {x^{14/4}}[/tex]
can i say that this integral converges and therefore the orgininal converges?, and more important, how would i justify that the last integral converges in an exam?
please correct any mistakes that i probably had made, and forgive me for me awful english.

Many Thanks, Paul.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you get that "14/4". If you just add the powers in the denominator you get 13/4. Are you arguing that [tex]\frac{x^2+1}{x^{\frac{13}{4}}}< \frac{x^2+1}{x^{\frac{14}{4}}}?<br /> <br /> In any case, you can't just add the exponents like that. If x is close to 0, then <br /> 1- x is close to 1 and x<sup>2</sup>+1 is close to 1. For x close to 0, the integrand is close to [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}= x^{-\frac{1}{2}}[/tex]. And, of course, that integral exists. <br /> <br /> To look at what happens for x close to 1, it might help to make the substitution <br /> u= 1- x. Then x<sup>2</sup>+ 1= 2- 2u+ u<sup>2</sup> and the integrand becomes [tex]\frac{2- 2u+ u}{\sqrt{1-u}u^{\frac{5}{4}}[/tex]. What is that like when u is close to 0?[/tex]
 
The first integrand varies as 1/sqrt(x) near zero ( I checked what the expression becomes for small values of x by means of the power series expansion.) .So, the integral will converge or diverge according as the integral of 1/sqrt(x).It converges.
Similarly,to put in awful technical language, the integrand becomes
(1^2 +1) /sqrt(1)*( 1-x)^5/4 near 1 & diverges because the integral
dx/(1-x)^5/4 diverges if taken over a neighbourhood of 1.
These ideas must be put in terms of inequalities; e.g. in the first case, constants p & q could be found out such that p/sqrt(x) < the integrand < q/sqrt(x)
holds in a neighbourhood of zero.
I am, with great respect,
Einstone.
 
Don't know what happened to my first response- and no "edit" button to fix it!

What I was saying is that since x2+1 and 1- x are both close to 1 for x close to 0, the integrand is close to x-1/2 which is integrable.

If you let u= 1- x, then x= 1- u so x2+1= u2- 2u+ 1 and the integrand becomes [tex]\frac{u^2- 2u+ 1}{\sqrt{1-u}u^\frac{5}{4}}[/tex].
For u close to 1 that is close to [tex]\frac{1}{u^\frac{5}{4}}[/tex] which does not converge.
 
thank you

First of all, thank you for your prompt and clear reply. I think i now understand how to do this exercise, but i don't know how to explain on a test why i can replace the integrands with another integrand that behaves the same way when x is close to 0 in the first part of the integral for example. I really don't understand the part of your explanation where you say that it can be found two constants p and q such that p/sqrt(x)<integrand<q/sqrt(x). I think that you are trying to show that i can replace the integrand by 1/sqrt(x)
but i don't know if it would be enough justification on a test.
Many Thanks, Paul.
 
Would this be sufficient:

[tex]\frac{x^2+1}{\sqrt{x}(1-x)^{5/4}}>\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}(1-x)^{5/4}}>\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}(1-x)^2}[/tex]

for all [itex]x\in (0,1)[/tex]<br /> <br /> Making the substitution [itex]u=\sqrt{x}[/itex] and using partial fractions, we obtain:<br /> <br /> [tex]\int \frac{dx}{\sqrt{x}(1-x)^2}=\frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{1}{1-\sqrt{x}}-ln(1-\sqrt{x})-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{x}}+ln(1+\sqrt{x})\right][/tex]<br /> <br /> which diverges as x goes to 1.<br /> <br /> Thus:<br /> <br /> [tex]\int_0^1 \frac{x^2+1}{\sqrt{x}(1-x)^{5/4}}[/tex]<br /> <br /> also diverges.[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K