Conversion between lbf and Newtons

  • Thread starter Thread starter abercrombiems02
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Newtons
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conversion between pound force (lbf) and Newtons, particularly focusing on the relationship between mass and force in different unit systems. Participants are exploring the definitions and implications of these units in the context of gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the derivation of the conversion factor between lbf and Newtons, with some attempting to clarify the distinction between pound mass (lbm) and pound force (lbf). Others are exploring the implications of using different gravitational constants in calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the definitions of units and their applications. There is an acknowledgment of differing opinions on the use of these units, and some participants express a preference for the metric system.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of gravitational acceleration values, specifically 9.81 m/s² and 32.2 ft/s², which are relevant to the conversion discussions. Participants are also reflecting on the complexities and potential confusion arising from using imperial units.

abercrombiems02
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
I know there are 4.48 N in 1 pound force. The only way I can derive this is dividing 9.8 m/s^2 by 2.2 lbm/kg. The result shows that there 4.48 N in 1 lbm, but shouldn't it be that there are 4.48 N in 1 lbf. Can anyone clear this up or show a better derivation? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the surface of the earth, which is indicated by your using 9.81, one pound force IS one pound "mass". (I put "mass" in quotes because, strictly speaking, the pound IS a unit of force, not mass. When you talk about "one lbm" you mean the mass that, at the surface of the earth, would weigh one pound.)
 
so then it would be valid to say that 1 lbf = 1 lbm*ft/s^2 when g has a magnitude of 32.2 ft/s^2?
 
You are correct. Using Newton's 2nd Law in the fps system, it is expressed as:

[tex]F = m \frac{a}{g_c}[/tex]

In this formulation, [tex]a[/tex] is the local acceleration due to gravity and [tex]g_c[/tex] = 32.17405 lb·ft/(lbf·s²)

You will run into different opinions on the use. I am of the opinion that one should always designate what you are talking about, i.e. [tex]lb_m[/tex] or [tex]lb_f[/tex]
 
Last edited:
This is why the metric system rocks.
 
You couldn't possibly be anymore correct about that statement. stupid slugs, lbm, and lbf!
 
Confession: I admit that sometimes, when I am just not thinking correctly, I'll convert a problem to SI units to do the calculations. Shhhh...don't say that too loudly.[/size]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
24K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
97K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K