Calculating Poisson's Ratio: Step-by-Step Guide

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation and understanding of a specific formula related to Poisson's ratio, particularly in the context of strain gauges and resistance calculations. Participants explore the mathematical relationships involved, including the implications of Poisson's ratio on area and resistance changes during tensile tests.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the formula dA=A(1-m dL/L)^2-A, questioning its derivation.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the context in which this formula appears, suggesting it may relate to tensile testing.
  • A participant provides a detailed derivation involving resistance and gauge factor, linking it to the formula in question.
  • There is a request for proof of the formula, with a participant expressing a lack of understanding of mechanical concepts and Poisson's ratio.
  • One participant mentions the source of the formula as "Transducer Engineering" by S. Renganathan.
  • A participant shares an algebraic manipulation of the formula, attempting to clarify its implications for gauge factor.
  • Another participant questions the validity of equating Poisson's ratio with a specific form of the formula, indicating a potential disagreement.
  • A participant explains the relationship between area and length in the context of Poisson's ratio, providing a geometric perspective on the changes in dimensions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement regarding the formula's derivation and implications. Some participants are attempting to derive the formula while others question its validity or context. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the formula's application and derivation.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific mathematical steps and assumptions that are not fully resolved, particularly regarding the definitions and relationships involving Poisson's ratio and gauge factor. The discussion includes various interpretations of the formula and its derivation.

saravanan_n
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
please help on this formula how it has been arrived?

dA=A(1-m dL/L)^2-A

where m= Poisson's ratio
A=area of cross section
L=length
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In what context have you seen this? I can't recall seeing this form. I'll try to work out a proof. It looks like it's in regards to a tensile test...
 
gauge factor

While deriving the formulae for Gauge factor of materials(resitors) in strain gauges it comes.In between they have given this formula.

First they told

R=PL/A

R=RESISTANCE
P=SPECIFIC RESISTANCE
L=LENGTH
A= AREA

Then,

dR=a(PdL+LdP) - P L da
-------------------
a^2

Divide L.H.S by R and R.H.S by PL/A we get

dR dL dP dA
-- = --- + ---- - ----- (eqn 1)
R L P A



And suddenly they give this formula

as

dA= A(1-m dL/L)^2 -A

m=poisson's ratio

they substituted this in equation (1)

and finally arrived at gauge factor (dR/R)/(dL/L)
 
Please I need a answer How this formula is obtained?

da=a(1-m dl/l)^2 - a

please help me.
 
I can not find anything in my references that has that particular form. I am trying to derive it but not having much luck right now. I am still trying though. BTW...who is "they"? What book/reference states this?
 
Book reference

It is from "Transducer Engineering" by S.Renganathan
 
please provide me the proof for this formulae:

da=a(1-m dl/l)^2-a
i.e., da/a=(1-m dl/l)^2 -1
=1+m^2 (dl/l)^2-2m dl/l -1
=(m dl/l)^2 - 2m dl/l

so da/a= (m dl/l)^2 - 2m dl/l
=m dl/l(m dl/l -2)

so

(da/a)/(dl/l)=m^2 (dl/l)-2m

now atleast you can say me how we arrive at this formula.Because I don't know any of the mechanical concepts and also about Poisson ratio.If you find any material regarding these please send me.My e-mail Id is

saravanan_n@msn.com
 
Pretty impatient people these days...Maybe "at least" I can tell you this:

Start with the relationship for an electrical conductor:

[tex]R = \frac{\rho L}{A}[/tex]

Where:
[tex]R[/tex] = Resistance
[tex]\rho[/tex] = Resistivity
[tex]A[/tex] = Cross sectional Area

Now differentiate it:

[tex]dR = \frac{A(L d\rho + \rho dL) - \rho L dA)}{A^2}[/tex]

Now go back and divide the last equation by the first and have fun with the algebra. Remember the definition of Poisson's Ratio: [tex]\nu = \frac{dA/A}{dL/L}[/tex]
 
Sorry for being impatient,Since I have test on this I have to hurry.
Now we get
DR/R=DL/L+DP/P-DA/A

Then we divide whole eqn by dl/l

(dr/r)/(dl/l)=1+(dp/p)/(dl/l)-m

so we can put
Gauge Factor=1+Piezoresistivity-Poisson ratio

Is this equation right?
 
  • #10
Equation Not Agrreable

If you say Poisson Ratio =(da/a)/(dl/l)

then do you agree with this equation also

da=a(1-((poisson ratio) dl/l)^2)-a
(in whatever context it comes)
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Poisson's ratio is the lateral contraction per unit breadth divided by the longitudinal extension per unit length.

But A is proportional to the square of the length, i.e. a square has area, A = l2, where l is side length, or a circle has area [itex]\pi[/itex]r2, where r is radius.

Now looking in three dimensions, if lx and ly contract by [itex]\nu\,(\frac{\Delta{l_z}}{l_z})[/itex] then the new lengths are

lx([itex]1 - \nu (\frac{\Delta{l_z}}{l_z})[/itex]) and ly([itex]1 - \nu (\frac{\Delta{l_z}}{l_z})[/itex]),

and the Area is then given by the product. If Ao = lx ly, then the new area is

A = Ao * ([itex]1 - \nu\,\frac{\Delta{l_z}}{l_z}[/itex])2

and dA = A - Ao, which defines dA.
 
  • #12
Thanks for the reply.I am very much pleased.Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K