How Did the Michelson-Morley Experiment Challenge the Existence of Aether?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter questionauthority
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Michelson-Morley experiment fundamentally challenged the existence of the luminiferous aether by demonstrating that light's speed remains constant across different reference frames. Despite the expectation that the aether would affect light's speed, the experiment showed no observable interference pattern, regardless of the Earth's motion or the season. This led to the conclusion that the aether did not exist, paving the way for Einstein's theory of Special Relativity, which simplified the understanding of light's behavior without the need for aether. The experiment's results were consistent across multiple repetitions globally, reinforcing the conclusion that light behaves uniformly in all frames of reference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations and their implications for electromagnetic waves.
  • Familiarity with the concept of reference frames in physics.
  • Basic knowledge of interference patterns in wave physics.
  • Awareness of the historical context of physics leading up to the 20th century.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of Maxwell's equations in electromagnetic theory.
  • Explore the concept of Lorentz transformations and their role in Special Relativity.
  • Investigate the experimental setup and methodology of the Michelson-Morley experiment in detail.
  • Examine the historical transition from aether theories to modern physics frameworks.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the historical development of modern physics, particularly those studying the foundations of electromagnetic theory and relativity.

questionauthority
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Can someone explain to me how the Michealson-Morley experiment proved that the speed of light is constant in all frames of reference?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It did not prove this, but it strongly suggested it. Here is how the logic goes: Maxwell's equations for electricty and magnetism predicted wave solutions that travel at a speed of [itex]\frac{1} {\sqrt{\epsilon_0\mu_0}}[/itex]. People plugged in the known values of [itex]\epsilon_0[/itex] and [itex]\mu_0[/itex], and got a speed that was exactly equal to the known speed of light within experimental error. This lead to the hypothesis that light was a Maxwell wave. Experiments by Heidrich Hertz showed that Maxwell waves behave like light in every way. This essentially proved that light was a Maxwell wave as much as anything can be proven in physics. Now, the disturbing thing was that you could calculate the speed of a Maxwell wave in one reference frame, and then try to calculate it again, this time in a different reference frame moving with some speed with respect to the first one. The weird thing is that observers in both frames get the same answer. The assumption that was then made by physicists at the time to resolve this apparent paradox was that Maxwell's equations must be stricly valid in only one reference frame. This would mean that only one observer would be correct in applying Maxwell's equations for the speed of the wave and resolve the apparent paradox. This frame was known as the frame of the "luminiferous aether". It was believed that the aether was a fluid that EM waves were carried by.

The natural question that emerged was "what is the aether frame". That is, is the aether stationary with respect to the sun, or some other star, or none of these.(The question was stated this way because, at the time the aether was believed to be a well established fact and a cornerstone of physics) Several experiments were made in an attempt to answer this question, which all failed for one reason or another. Finally, Michaelson developed an experiment which could not fail. He tried to measure the speed of the aether with respect to the Earth by exploting the very small wavelength of light and the resultant fact that a small disturbance could lead to visible results in an interferance pattern.

The experimental set up is much better described by a picture than words, so look at this http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/more_stuff/flashlets/mmexpt6.htm
No matter how the interferometer was rotated, no interferance was observed. It did not matter what season the experiment was performed in, so it couldn't be that the Earth just happened to be moving at the same speed as the aether at that particular moment. It was also disproven that the aether could be dragged around by the Earth based on observations of starlight. The experiment was repeated in labs around the world with the same result: no aether effect. This did not kill the aether, though. The prominent physicist Hendric Lorenz believed that the aether caused one of the arms of the interferometer to contract. In quantifying this contraction, he formulated the relations between space and time in different reference frames that Einstein derived in Special relativity, although Lorenz did not assume the constancy of the speed of light.(These equations are still known as the "Lorenz transformations") However, assuming that the aether does not exist and that the speed of light is the same to all observers results in a simpler theory which ultimately agreed with experiment. If you want me to elaborate on the experiment itself, let me know, but this post is already exteamly long.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K