How was theta1 obtained from the system of expressions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mikeley
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the expression for theta1 from a system of equations involving variables Px, Py, and constants. Participants explore the relationships between these variables and the implications for the equations provided, focusing on the mathematical manipulations required to arrive at theta1.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests clarification on how theta1 is derived from the given equations, noting the absence of theta in the initial expressions.
  • Another participant suggests that S1 and C1 might represent sin(theta) and cos(theta), respectively, and emphasizes the need for LaTeX formatting for clarity.
  • A later reply provides modified equations, clarifying that a2, d4, Px, and Py are constants, and presents the equations for Px and Py in terms of theta1 and other angles.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of the modified equations, particularly regarding the absence of certain variables in the final expressions and the need for clarity in notation.
  • One participant proposes a method to manipulate the equations by multiplying Px and Py by sin(theta) and cos(theta), leading to a new expression for tan(theta). They claim to have derived a simpler form for tan(theta) through this manipulation.
  • Another participant expresses satisfaction with the derived expression and indicates they do not need to revert to the original forms for their purposes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correctness of the equations and the clarity of notation. There is no consensus on the validity of the modified equations or the interpretation of the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential ambiguities in the definitions of variables and the assumptions underlying the equations, particularly regarding the roles of constants and angles in the expressions.

mikeley
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Can you please tell me how theta1 was obtained from this system:

Px=C1(a2*C2+d4*S23)-d2*S1
Py=S1(a2*C2+d4*S23)+d2*C1

theta1=atan((Py*sqrt(Px^2+Py^2-d2^2)-d2*Px)/(Px*sqrt(Px^2+Py^2-d2^2)+d2*Py))

theta1=atan((-Py*sqrt(Px^2+Py^2-d2^2)-d2*Px)/(-Px*sqrt(Px^2+Py^2-d2^2)+d2*Py))
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Please use [itex]\LaTeX[/itex]. Also, it might help to explain what Px, C1, C2, a2, etc.. are. Also, [itex]\theta[/itex] doesn't occur in your first two equations, so I have no idea how it was found, unless you explain what your symbols represent.
 
since S1 and C1 don't appear in the two final expressions, then perhaps S1 is sin(theta) and C1 is cos(theta) ??

Latex would be nicer.
 
Last edited:
Sorry AKG and Fermat. Here is my post modified:

a2, d4, Px, Py are all constants

[tex] <br /> Px=\cos(\theta1)*(a2*\cos(\theta2)+d4*\sin(\theta2+\theta3))-d2*\sin(\theta1)[/tex]

[tex] Py=\sin(\theta1)*(a2*\cos(\theta2)+d4*\sin(\theta2+\theta3))+d2*\cos(\theta1)[/tex]

[tex] \theta1=\arctan((Py*\sqrt(Px^2+Py^2-d2^2)-d2*Px)/(Px*\sqrt(Px^2+Py^2-d2^2)+d2*Py))[/tex]

[tex] \theta1=\arctan((-Py*\sqrt(Px^2+Py^2-d2^2)-d2*Px)/(-Px*\sqrt(Px^2+Py^2-d2^2)+d2*Py))[/tex]
 
Are you sure this is right. Before I do anything, it looks strange that [itex]d4,\, \theta _2,\mbox{ and }\theta _3[/itex] don't appear anywhere in your second pair of equations. Also, just for clarity, use subscripts, so you probably want to write [itex]d4[/itex] as [itex]d_4[/itex] unless you mean the fourth power of d, [itex]d^4[/itex]. Anyways, take the first equation for [itex]\theta _1[/itex] and plug in Px and Py, and see if the equations are even correct. If not, then we need not go any further. If they are, then perhaps in working backwards you can see a general method to go "forwards" if they started you off with a slightly different Px and Py.
 
Also, you're telling us that you wrote "S23" and expected that anyone would understand that you meant [itex]\sin (\theta _2 + \theta _3)[/itex]? What were you thinking?
 
AKG said:
Also, you're telling us that you wrote "S23" and expected that anyone would understand that you meant [itex]\sin (\theta _2 + \theta _3)[/itex]? What were you thinking?

Would you like some salt and pepper to go with that :wink:

in my equations I have only d4 not dA, and d2 is not d^2 and d4 is not d^4. d2 and d4 are two constants raised to the first degree. And yes, I checked my equations before posting, and they are ok. So some how in the result, t1=..., the expression containing d4 was canceled.
 
Here are some pointers for a solution.

Multiply Px by sinθ and Py by cosθ. subtract Pxsinθ from Pycosθ to get rid of the bracketed term.
You should end up with Pycosθ - Pxsinθ = d2.
Divide both sides by cosθ.
Square both sides and get a quadratic in tanθ.
Solve ...

I ended up with a simpler form for tanθ.

[tex]tan\theta = \left(P_xP_y \pm d_2\sqrt{P_x^2 + P_y^2 - d_2^2}\right) / (P_x^2 - d_2^2)[/tex]

I manipulated your expression(s) for tanθ and ended up with my expression, so I suppose it could be done backwards - get your expression from mine - but it was a wee bit tedious.
Do you need to use the original form(s)?
 
Thank you very much Fermat. No, I don't have to use the original form.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
39
Views
6K