What is the rate of change for a spherical raindrop's radius as it evaporates?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jordanfc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Related rates
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on a problem involving the rate of change of a spherical raindrop's radius as it evaporates, specifically addressing the relationship between the volume and surface area of the raindrop and how this affects the radius over time. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and conceptual clarification regarding the problem's parameters and implications.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the constant of proportionality refers to \(\frac{dV}{dA}\) and seeks clarification on whether they need to find \(\frac{dr}{dt}\) or another rate.
  • Another participant argues that the problem is nonsensical if interpreted with a positive rate of change for volume, suggesting that a negative constant would be more appropriate for evaporation.
  • A participant expresses confusion about their calculations, noting that differentiating the volume with respect to the radius leads to a cancellation that results in \(\frac{dr}{dt} = -3\), which they believe cannot be correct.
  • One participant humorously challenges the notion that the derived rate cannot be correct, suggesting that it might indeed be valid.
  • A later reply questions the relevance of finding the rate of change specifically when the radius is 2, implying that the rate may be constant as volume and surface area decrease proportionally.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the problem and the implications of the constant of proportionality. There is no consensus on the correct approach or interpretation of the rate of change of the radius.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential ambiguities in the problem, including the interpretation of the constant of proportionality and the implications of a positive versus negative rate of change for volume. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the mathematical relationships involved.

jordanfc
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This is the problem as it appears in the text. "As a spherical raindrop evaporates, its volume changes at a rate proportional to its surface area A. If the constant of proportionality is 3, find the rate of change of the radius r when r=2." My first question is does the constant of proportionality refer to [tex]\frac{dV}{dA}[/tex]? Secondly, am I being asked to find the rate of change of the radius with respect to time [tex]\frac{dr}{dt}[/tex] or another rate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, I don't think the problem makes sense. But I will try to answer your questions.

No, if you are told that A is proportional to B, it means there is a constant k such that A = kB. Here, it means that dV/dt = kA, for a certain constant k. Next, you are told that k = 3. But this is nonsense in my opinion because the raindrop is evaporating... and a positive dV/dt means V is augmenting. So I'd try doing the problem with k = -3 instead; it'd make more sense.

Yes, the rate of change of radius wrt time is dr/dt.
 
thanks quasar, with that information ill try the problem.
[tex]\frac{dV}{dt}=\frac{dV}{dr}\frac{dr}{dt}[/tex]

Since [tex]\frac{dV}{dt}=-3A[/tex]

Then [tex]-3(4{\pi}r^2)=\frac{dV}{dr}\frac{dr}{dt}[/tex]

But now it seems if i differentiate the volume with respect to the radius ill get the equation for surface area and it will cancel out and leave
[tex]\frac{dr}{dt}=-3[/tex]
And that can't be right, where have i erred?
 
Why can't it be right? I'd say it can't be wrong. :smile:
 
well then, thanks again quasar. so was it irrelevant to ask to find the rate of change when the radius was 2, meaning its a constant rate of change when the volume and surface area decrease proportionally?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
35K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K