| Thread Closed |
NewScientist: "Most scientific papers are probably wrong" |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Sep1-05, 05:45 PM | #1 |
|
|
NewScientist: "Most scientific papers are probably wrong"
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7915
|
| Sep1-05, 06:01 PM | #2 |
|
|
Somewhere out there, there is a paper that uses figures on the strength of a certain dental material that were obtained by me in my garage. I find that to be rather scary!
|
| Sep1-05, 06:09 PM | #3 |
|
And I built my garage with that dental material!
|
| Sep1-05, 06:26 PM | #4 |
|
|
NewScientist: "Most scientific papers are probably wrong"
|
| Sep1-05, 06:38 PM | #5 |
|
mmm... that might be hard. I didn't have a lot of plaster.... so i used cookie dough.
|
| Sep1-05, 06:50 PM | #6 |
|
|
|
| Sep2-05, 12:18 AM | #7 |
|
|
Yeah, emphasis on the "assuming that the new paper is itself correct" in the original article.
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: NewScientist: "Most scientific papers are probably wrong"
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| "string theory is a complete scientific failure" by Daniel Friedan | Beyond the Standard Model | 23 | ||
| [SOLVED] Two presenters of a "scientific" France 2 (public TV channel) prog | General Physics | 0 | ||
| Most scientific papers are probably wrong!? | General Discussion | 14 | ||