The solar systems and space probes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the gravitational dynamics of a three-body system consisting of two massive bodies (the Sun and Jupiter) and a smaller satellite. It explores the possibility of achieving infinite thrust for the satellite using only gravitational interactions, without initial kinetic energy relative to the center of mass (CM). The conversation highlights the slingshot effect, demonstrating that a satellite can achieve escape velocity through gravitational assists, specifically noting that the kinetic energy gained can be twice the gravitational potential energy. Newtonian mechanics is emphasized, with a clear avoidance of general relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian gravity and gravitational forces
  • Familiarity with orbital mechanics and escape velocity concepts
  • Knowledge of the slingshot effect in celestial mechanics
  • Basic mathematical skills to manipulate equations involving gravitational forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of the slingshot effect in orbital mechanics
  • Study the principles of three-body problems in celestial dynamics
  • Explore the concept of escape velocity and its applications in space missions
  • Investigate the implications of gravitational assists in spacecraft trajectory planning
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, aerospace engineers, and students interested in gravitational physics and orbital mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

vidmar
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
OK the title is a bit practical, I've made the question somewhat more theoretical (technical, whatever), in particular:
One is given three bodies: two relatievly massive (for example the Sun and a massive planet like Jupiter) and one relatievly small (for example a satellite) - meaning that its gravitational effect on the other two may be neglected or is "turned off" (depending on how you wish to formulate the problem). The two "massive" bodies, denote them by M1 and M2, are in a closed orbit around their centre of mass (CM). Does there exist a set of initial conditions (fot time t0) involving (velocities of M1 and M2, position of satellite relative to the centre of mass) which will "thrust" the satellite ad infinitum (i.e. for every distance from the centre of mass of the system (CMS), there exists a time t from t0, for which the satellite achieves this distance), provided that it does not move relative to the CMS at the biginning (t0). Basically what I am asking is, can I place the satellite in the gravitational field of two objects and thrust it ad infinitum with no beginnig kinetic energy relative to the CMS taking advantege only of the gravitational pulls of the objects (with a few limitations of course:) Naturally I would like only Newton to "bear on this problem" (general relativity would be slightly to much.
Also I've come across an interesting fact that given 5 objects (gravitation, Newton) they can go to infinity in finite time! If anyone has anything specific on that, feel free to post.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Yes.

let's suppose that the orbital system, like the sun and jupiter, has two stages of massiveness. There is a very massive sun in the center which we will assume is stationary. And there is a massive planet which orbits the sun in a circular manner. The speed of the planet in its orbit is constant and that speed is determined by its distance to the sun and the sun's mass as follows:

[tex]F/m = a = GM/r^2 = v^2/r[/tex]

or

[tex]v = \sqrt{GM/r}[/tex]

Now the slingshot effect can give a velocity to the test mass of 2v, (a result you can obtain by considering the problem as a scattering in the rest frame of the massive particle and then translating back to the rest frame of the sun) so its kinetic energy afterwards will be:

[tex]KE = 0.5mv^2 = 0.5 \times 4 GmM/r = 2 GmM/r[/tex].

This is twice the object's gravitational potential energy, so it is the case that the test object has achieved escape velocity.

Carl
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K