Calculating the Angle of a Perfect Circle: A Simple Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter golith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Circle
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of calculating angles related to circular motion, specifically in the context of a circle with a given radius. Participants explore the meaning of "angle of the circle" and its implications in physics, particularly concerning forces and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the definition of "angle of the circle" and its relevance to circular motion. There are discussions about the relationship between velocity, radius, and the forces acting on an object in circular motion. Some participants explore the implications of angular displacement and how it affects g-forces.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's interpretations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between linear and centripetal acceleration, and the use of the Pythagorean theorem to find total acceleration has been mentioned. However, there is no explicit consensus on the initial question regarding the angle of the circle.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating various assumptions about motion in circles, including the effects of speed and radius on forces experienced. The conversation includes references to g-forces and the need for clarity on terms used in the context of circular motion.

golith
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Just a quick question
I have a circle with radius of 5 metres, what is the angle of the circle?
or is there a simple formula to work this out.

Thanx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
golith said:
Hi,
Just a quick question
I have a circle with radius of 5 metres, what is the angle of the circle?
or is there a simple formula to work this out.

Thanx
What is meant by "angle of the circle"?
 
the angle of the circle would be the constant angle (? angular velocity?) you would be on as you went around the horizontal ride. If its radius is 5 metres and is traveling at 1 m/s with a mass of 100kg in a circle, i believe i will need to know its angle to find out the force applied at any given time in its coarse.
Did this clear it up a bit? :)
thanx
 
golith said:
the angle of the circle would be the constant angle (? angular velocity?) you would be on as you went around the horizontal ride. If its radius is 5 metres and is traveling at 1 m/s with a mass of 100kg in a circle, i believe i will need to know its angle to find out the force applied at any given time in its coarse.
Did this clear it up a bit? :)
thanx
What do you mean by "the constant angle you would be on"? If you are traveling at 1m/s around a circle and the radius is 5 meters, then your angular displacement depends on how much time has passed.
 
Hay there, just re-reading some other information and have another question?
If your traveling in a straight line and your velocity is 1 m/s and you want to achieve a g-force of 5G would you therefore have to accelerate at (9.8m/s*5) or 48 m/s to affect 5 g's Thanx
 
LeonhardEuler said:
What do you mean by "the constant angle you would be on"? If you are traveling at 1m/s around a circle and the radius is 5 meters, then your angular displacement depends on how much time has passed.
Yes this would be the vectoring I am at now, but would time now be in reference to your velocity ?
 
golith said:
Hay there, just re-reading some other information and have another question?
If your traveling in a straight line and your velocity is 1 m/s and you want to achieve a g-force of 5G would you therefore have to accelerate at (9.8m/s*5) or 48 m/s to affect 5 g's Thanx
Yes, that would do it. (except its 9.8m/s^2*5=49m/s^2)
Yes this would be the vectoring I am at now, but would time now be in reference to your velocity ?
Time would simply be the amount of time that has passed since you started moving.
 
Now that's very good but what if that straight line is now a circle as perfectly round as humanly possible. would this still apply or has angular displacement now componded the g force and therefore not have to accelerate at 49 m/s^2 but less ?

Thanx
 
http://www.sixflags.com/parks/overgeorgia/pdf/HighSchoolWorkbook.PDF

looking at this to inspire me and in particular the horizontal accelerometer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
golith said:
Now that's very good but what if that straight line is now a circle as perfectly round as humanly possible. would this still apply or has angular displacement now componded the g force and therefore not have to accelerate at 49 m/s^2 but less ?

Thanx
If a particle is changing direction, it is accelerating even if it is not speeding up or slowing down. If the radius of the circle is r and the particle's speed is v, then it's acceleration without changing speed is equal to [itex]\frac{v^2}{r}[/itex]. So, just by moving quickly enough in a small enough circle, you could have an acceleration of 5 g. For example, moving at 16 m/s in a circle of radius 5 gives an acceleration of a6^2/5=51.2m/s^2, which is about 5.2 g. If the particle also speeds up while moving in a circle, its acceleration will be the vector sum of the linear acceleration and the centripetal acceleration.
 
  • #11
Ah ha, Have U been told you are a legend :)
This has helped no end.
The last part of my query then is the last part being the vector sum of the linear acceleration and the centipital acceleration.
Could I express this by stating a(centripetal) is V(2/t)/R
Linear acceleration as Vf-Vi/t = * m/s/s
If so then how do you do the vector sum of these two quantities? :)
That would be it and the computer would be able to do the rest to apply what's required upn the object at any given time.
This would then negate having to travel at high speeds to fool the particle into thinking it is traveling faster than it is, just deacceleration is the bugga now then in how to affect a rapid deacceleration when your not actually traveling that fast. Anyhow i will get there.
I added you to my buddy list and hope to be able to employ your good talent in the future. I'm also trying my hand at thermodynamics and quantum physics in general to be able to grasp concepts required in the future.
Hope to talk to you again.

Sorry for the waffle
Long live Formula one
 
  • #12
The linear and centripetal accelerations are perpendicular vectors, so they can be added by the pythagorean theorem. If [itex]a_c[/itex] is the centripetal acceleration and [itex]a_l[/itex] is the linear acceleration, then the total acceleration is:
[tex]\sqrt{a_c^2 + a_l^2}[/tex]
 
  • #13
Yet again another so simple answer in this world of complexities.
I tip my hat to you sir.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K