| Thread Closed |
Seebeck Voltages |
Share Thread |
| Sep5-05, 02:15 PM | #1 |
|
|
Seebeck Voltages
I have an issue with converting these to temperatures. I have the equation, voltage is in microvolts, but when I convert, say boiling water at 3600 microvolts to celsius, it gives me something like 90 C. It ought to be close to 95 C, I am in Colorado.
I did it today in excel, and the matlab equation I wrote for it last week gave me the same answer. According to the lab handouts, the error should only be +/- 0.05 C. Thanks for any help! |
| Sep5-05, 03:31 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Let's see what you are doing. Are you actually using a thermocouple? What metals are you using? You could possibly be using the wrong coefficients...
|
| Sep5-05, 06:25 PM | #3 |
|
|
Yes, we are using thermocouples made of Ni-Ch and Ni-Al
Type K thermocouples (given by profs) Here is the equation T = 0.0 + 2.508355e-2*v + 7.860106e–8*v^2 + –2.503131e–10*v^3 + 8.315270e–14*v^4 + –1.228034e–17*v^5 + 9.804036e–22*v^6 + –4.413030e–26*v^7 + 1.057734e–30*v^8 + –1.052755e–35*v^9 Again v is in microvolts, and T is in celsius. Because I am just a few degrees off, I am wondering if the polynomial is right, ie do we have the right thermocouple type. |
| Sep5-05, 10:45 PM | #4 |
|
|
Seebeck Voltages
anyone else?
I have checked this in matlab, and with other people, getting the same answer. but the LabVIEW VI software in the lab gives us the right answer |
| Sep6-05, 07:04 AM | #5 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Looking at my ASTM tc reference, the K type polynomial is different than what you have. Give me a bit and I'll post it.
|
| Sep6-05, 07:51 AM | #6 |
|
|
OK, thanks.
I pulled mine from National Instruments documentation on thermocouples, but I will be interested to see yours. |
| Sep6-05, 09:01 AM | #7 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Without running some numbers I can't say if this will fix your offset, but I did forget that there are two exponential corrections for the first two terms. Take a look at the attached page.
Also note the reference temperature of 0° Ref. ASTM Manual on the use of thermocouples in temperature measurement, 4th edition. |
| Sep6-05, 07:56 PM | #8 |
|
|
Thanks for that, but the problem with that is that converts from temp to volts, i need to go the other way.
|
| Sep7-05, 07:56 AM | #9 |
|
Recognitions:
|
All right. Let me see what else I can dig up.
|
| Sep8-05, 06:35 AM | #10 |
|
Recognitions:
|
OK. Try this one. Hopefully this one will help. This is from NIST. It is a typical K type TC table, however at the very end there is a section for the inverse function of temp and emf. Give that a look see and maybe that will hlp you out.
|
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: Seebeck Voltages
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Seebeck Effect a bit of a puzzler | Classical Physics | 2 | ||
| Seebeck effect and hot-probe test | General Physics | 0 | ||
| Seebeck coefficeints | Classical Physics | 1 | ||
| Seebeck effect and hot-probe test | General Physics | 0 | ||
| Pyroelectricity=Peltier-Seebeck effect? | General Physics | 2 | ||