Formula for calculating w0 (w at resonance)

  • Thread starter Thread starter toxique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Resonance
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the formula for calculating the resonant frequency (ω₀) in a two-branch parallel circuit consisting of a voltage source, an inductor in series with a resistor, and a capacitor in series with another resistor. Participants explore the differences between parallel and series resonance, and they seek assistance in solving a specific exercise involving given circuit parameters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the formula for calculating ω₀ in the context of a parallel circuit, suggesting it differs from the series RLC circuit.
  • Another participant proposes that the resonant frequency ω₀ can be derived from the condition that the imaginary part of the total admittance Y(ω) is zero.
  • Some participants discuss the relationship between the inductive and capacitive impedances at resonance, stating that they should be equal.
  • There is a mention of a specific formula involving R, L, and C, but uncertainty about its correctness is expressed.
  • One participant challenges the results obtained by another, questioning why the total impedance has a non-zero reactive component at resonance.
  • Another participant suggests that the imaginary part of the admittance is frequency-dependent and asks for clarification on the frequency used in calculations.
  • A later reply indicates that ω₀ is not simply 1/√(LC) and suggests using a different approach to find the resonant frequency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct formula for ω₀ and the behavior of the circuit at resonance. There is no consensus on the correct approach or formula, and multiple competing views remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific circuit parameters and calculations, but there are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the definitions of impedance and admittance. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and approaches to the problem.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or practitioners interested in electrical engineering, particularly those studying resonance in parallel circuits and the associated calculations of inductance and capacitance.

toxique
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi dudes. sory if it is not the correct area for this question.

A question. What is the formula for calculaing w0 (w at resonance) in a two-branch parallel circuit consisting of:
A voltage source
branch 1: R1 + L (in series)
branch 2: R2 + C (in series)

I thought it was the same as RLC series, but it actually is pretty different.

BTW I got a parallel resonance exercise but cannot figure out how to solve it.
Same circuit as above, but:
r1 = 2 ohm
r2 = 5 ohm
C = -10j ohm
W = 5000 radian

Find out the value of L (both in ohms and Henry)
Any help on this subject is really appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  1. Calculate the impedance [tex]Z_1(\omega)[/tex] of branch 1.
  2. Calculate the impedance [tex]Z_2(\omega)[/tex] of branch 2.
  3. Calculate the impedance [tex]Z(\omega) = X (\omega)+ iY(\omega)[/tex] of the two parallel branches.
  4. The resonant frequency [tex]\omega_0[/tex] is that which makes null the imaginary term [tex]Y(\omega)[/tex]
 
Thanks SGT for your prompt reply.

By Y(w) you mean the reactive component or admitance?

somewhere I've read that for this kind of circuits:

w0 = [ 1 / sqrt(LC) ] * [ sqrt(r^2 - L/C) ] / [ sqrt(r^2 + L/C) ] or something similar. This is what i do not understand.

sorry for not posting in Latex!
 
at resonance the circuit will act as pure resistive circuits, meaning the power factor is zero or the value of capacitive and inductive impedance is the same. thus:

given:

W= 5000 radians

then:

ZL=WL...impdedance (Z) of inductive element
ZC= 1/WC...impedance (Z) of capacitive element

since ZL=ZC (at resonance)

then:

WL= 1/WC or

L= 1/(W^2*C)

given, W=5000 rad, C=-j10

C= -j10= -j/(WC)

C= 20x10 exp (-6) or 20 microfarad

therefore:


L= 1/ {[5000^2]*[20 x 10 exp (-6)] }

L= 2 x 10 exp (-3) or 2 mili Henry

or, ZL= WL= [5000]*[2 x 10 exp (-3)]

ZL= 10 ohms,,,,thats it
 
at resonance the circuit will act as pure resistive circuits, meaning the power factor is zero or the value of capacitive and inductive impedance is the same. thus:

given:

W= 5000 radians

then:

ZL=WL...impdedance (Z) of inductive element
ZC= 1/WC...impedance (Z) of capacitive element

condition: ZL=ZC (at resonance)

then:

WL= 1/WC or L= 1/ (W^2*C)...this is the key formula

given, W=5000 rad, C=-j10

C= -j10= -j/(WC)

C= 20x10 exp (-6) or 20 microfarad

therefore:

L= 1/ {[5000^2]*[20 x 10 exp (-6)] }

L= 2 x 10 exp (-3) or 2 mili Henry

or, ZL= jWL= [5000]*[2 x 10 exp (-3)]

ZL= j10 ohms,,,,thats it

answers:

L= 2 MILIHENRY

ZL= j10 ohms at an angular frequency of 5000

...at resonance
:smile:
 
Last edited:
toxique said:
Thanks SGT for your prompt reply.

By Y(w) you mean the reactive component or admitance?

somewhere I've read that for this kind of circuits:

w0 = [ 1 / sqrt(LC) ] * [ sqrt(r^2 - L/C) ] / [ sqrt(r^2 + L/C) ] or something similar. This is what i do not understand.

sorry for not posting in Latex!
[tex]Y(\omega)[/tex] is the reactive component.
Using the set of rules I suggested you, we can conclude that [tex]\omega_0 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}[/tex] exactly like in a series or parallel circuit.
 
Thanx a lot guys for your replys.

About the solution by "young e.", a question:

From the results you obtained, it means that Ztotal = 15.43 + 4.2857i.

should not the reactive component on Ztotal be equal to 0, thus leaving only a resistive part <> 0 ? Even working it out as admittances, Y1L and Y2C are different.

y1 = 0.019231 - 0.096154i
y2 = 0.040000 + 0.080000i

y1 + y2 = 0.059231 - 0.016154i

Whats wrong here? I do not get it. AFIK, parallel resonance has a rather ****ty behaviour compared to series resonance.

Best regarss.
 
toxique said:
Thanx a lot guys for your replys.

About the solution by "young e.", a question:

From the results you obtained, it means that Ztotal = 15.43 + 4.2857i.

should not the reactive component on Ztotal be equal to 0, thus leaving only a resistive part <> 0 ? Even working it out as admittances, Y1L and Y2C are different.

y1 = 0.019231 - 0.096154i
y2 = 0.040000 + 0.080000i

y1 + y2 = 0.059231 - 0.016154i

Whats wrong here? I do not get it. AFIK, parallel resonance has a rather ****ty behaviour compared to series resonance.

Best regarss.

The imaginary part of the admittance is frequency dependent. What frequency have you used to calculate it?
 
Hi SGT.

I have used W = 5000 (which is 2*pi*796.178) as stated in the exercise. It supposed to be W0 = 5000

Best Regardz.
 
  • #10
Forget my previous post. [tex]\omega_0[/tex] is not [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}[/tex]. Use the rules I suggested you to obtain the resonant frequency.
If you want only to calculate the inductance, the admittance of branch 1 is:
[tex]Y_1(\omega)=\frac{1}{R_1 + j\omega L}[/tex]
The imaginary part of this admittance must be equal to the negative of the admittance of branch 1.
[tex]imag(Y_1) = - 0.08[/tex]
From this you get a second degree equation in L.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K